I don't think I'm getting my account back.
31-35, F
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Onasander · 41-45, M
You'll get a automated review, not human (i'm certain it isn't human) saying your review was looked over by a real human and your account is still frozen.
I had a non-public account, doing image analysis of historical and art pics, and a bit of history and ancient philosophy. Half my followers were Jain (a pacifist religion from India) and did very little politics. My first offense was posting a optical illusion, and we had a debate what modes of mind were involved in processing it. I got accused of hate crime from a third party checker, and we all were stumped how that happened, as nobody was allowed to look at the account, and furthermore, nobody said anything remotely critical or offensive. We were talking about perception and cognition. And the thurd party fact checker made no sense.
After that, it became more and more routine. I contacted Viva Frei on youtube (has a big youtube law channel) and told him the AI was basically a Libel Generator violating 9th circuit court precedent.
They eventually banned me outright because I listed my birthday as the day of the battle of Fort Sumpter during the civil war. I jever got it back. Which is unfortunate because I lost contact with alot of philosophers I knew then.
It's not a human reviewed process, just says it is. Once it labels you as a bad actor, it's downhill the rest of the way. They will find a way to get rid of you soon, even if they let you back in. Welcome to Twitter.
I had a non-public account, doing image analysis of historical and art pics, and a bit of history and ancient philosophy. Half my followers were Jain (a pacifist religion from India) and did very little politics. My first offense was posting a optical illusion, and we had a debate what modes of mind were involved in processing it. I got accused of hate crime from a third party checker, and we all were stumped how that happened, as nobody was allowed to look at the account, and furthermore, nobody said anything remotely critical or offensive. We were talking about perception and cognition. And the thurd party fact checker made no sense.
After that, it became more and more routine. I contacted Viva Frei on youtube (has a big youtube law channel) and told him the AI was basically a Libel Generator violating 9th circuit court precedent.
They eventually banned me outright because I listed my birthday as the day of the battle of Fort Sumpter during the civil war. I jever got it back. Which is unfortunate because I lost contact with alot of philosophers I knew then.
It's not a human reviewed process, just says it is. Once it labels you as a bad actor, it's downhill the rest of the way. They will find a way to get rid of you soon, even if they let you back in. Welcome to Twitter.
Sojournersoul · M
smileylovesgaming · 31-35, F
CookieCrisp · F
what did you do? lol
View 10 more replies »
disturbedchicken · 31-35, F
@Royricky09 ok, zesty boy.
@disturbedchicken you got it
UndeadSona · F
Well duh they don't care. If you have alot of followers you can make a big deal and get it back. Otherwise you're SOL
Missbirdie1986 · 36-40, F
@UndeadSona what does SOL mean
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
TheRascallyOne · 31-35, M
Stop posting nudes
TheRascallyOne · 31-35, M
@astrosandorbits 🤷♂
disturbedchicken · 31-35, F
@TheRascallyOne No, and don't joke with me.
TheRascallyOne · 31-35, M
@disturbedchicken ok
CestManan · 46-50, F
Aren't there a ton of other social media sites where people can upload countless selfies?
JasonH · 36-40, M
Means,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, you have been a NORTY girl
matthewjames · 18-21, M
sorry