I don't think I'm getting my account back.
31-35, F
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
You'll get a automated review, not human (i'm certain it isn't human) saying your review was looked over by a real human and your account is still frozen.
I had a non-public account, doing image analysis of historical and art pics, and a bit of history and ancient philosophy. Half my followers were Jain (a pacifist religion from India) and did very little politics. My first offense was posting a optical illusion, and we had a debate what modes of mind were involved in processing it. I got accused of hate crime from a third party checker, and we all were stumped how that happened, as nobody was allowed to look at the account, and furthermore, nobody said anything remotely critical or offensive. We were talking about perception and cognition. And the thurd party fact checker made no sense.
After that, it became more and more routine. I contacted Viva Frei on youtube (has a big youtube law channel) and told him the AI was basically a Libel Generator violating 9th circuit court precedent.
They eventually banned me outright because I listed my birthday as the day of the battle of Fort Sumpter during the civil war. I jever got it back. Which is unfortunate because I lost contact with alot of philosophers I knew then.
It's not a human reviewed process, just says it is. Once it labels you as a bad actor, it's downhill the rest of the way. They will find a way to get rid of you soon, even if they let you back in. Welcome to Twitter.
I had a non-public account, doing image analysis of historical and art pics, and a bit of history and ancient philosophy. Half my followers were Jain (a pacifist religion from India) and did very little politics. My first offense was posting a optical illusion, and we had a debate what modes of mind were involved in processing it. I got accused of hate crime from a third party checker, and we all were stumped how that happened, as nobody was allowed to look at the account, and furthermore, nobody said anything remotely critical or offensive. We were talking about perception and cognition. And the thurd party fact checker made no sense.
After that, it became more and more routine. I contacted Viva Frei on youtube (has a big youtube law channel) and told him the AI was basically a Libel Generator violating 9th circuit court precedent.
They eventually banned me outright because I listed my birthday as the day of the battle of Fort Sumpter during the civil war. I jever got it back. Which is unfortunate because I lost contact with alot of philosophers I knew then.
It's not a human reviewed process, just says it is. Once it labels you as a bad actor, it's downhill the rest of the way. They will find a way to get rid of you soon, even if they let you back in. Welcome to Twitter.