Fun & Games > Random

Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

It’s official, Trumpettes!

Biden has now officially secured enough votes to be elected president. Only four states left to certify, three of which are Democrat.

Don’t pin your hopes on the Supreme Court to award Trump Pennsylvania:

1. He hasn’t got the time to bring his case to the SCOTUS before Tuesday’s deadline.

2. Even if SCOTUS rules in his favour, the segregated votes won’t be enough for him to overturn Biden’s lead, even if he is awarded every single one.

3. Even if SCOTUS decides to award him Pennsylvania, he still won’t have enough EC votes.

Also, don’t pin your hopes on Faithless Electors. Both Houses have to approve their use.

Good luck getting them past Pelosi.

Face it, Trumpettes: Trump has lost. It’s over 😎

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

whiskeyinateacup · 31-35, F

LeopoldBloom · M

@whiskeyinateacup He was a sore winner in 2016, so of course he's a sore loser now.

revenant · F

We are entering the dark ages

View 52 more replies »

revenant · F

@LeopoldBloom absolutely. When you see the response to Covid globally speaking you know something is up

Elessar · 26-30, M

@revenant [quote]who pulls the strings ?[/quote]
Until Jan 21st, someone who took side with the virus. Won't be missed, from a covid management PoV.

Uachtarain · 26-30, M

@revenant Things would be better with Le Pen in charge, right?

MissTaken · 36-40, F

I read that Rudy Guiliani is claiming they don’t need the courts - which begs the question as to why they have spent so much money and time on a pointless venture 😂

Frank52 · 70-79, M

@MissTaken Is that the Guiliani who said that the courts would decide the election?

Uachtarain · 26-30, M

@Frank52 that just proves that Giuliani is essentially a mobster masquerading as a lawyer 😂

MissTaken · 36-40, F

@Frank52 That’s the one 🙂

SubstantialKick · 31-35, M

But...but...there was voter fraud! Trump said so! Even though there is no ounce or shred of evidence whatsoever!

SW-User

Sounds familiar lmfaooooo #russia @SubstantialKick

LeopoldBloom · M

@SW-User Don’t be so sure. President Biden will release the unredacted Mueller report.

SW-User

I’m sure he will 😂 @LeopoldBloom

deadgerbil · 22-25

That's not official. Fake news! VoTeR FrAuD!

Viper · M

@deadgerbil seriously, if that wasn't trade marked someone should sell them lol

Or heck, change it up, so it's not trade marked a bid and sell them anyways...

"Stop the Vote" tin foil hat lol

"Fraud" tin foil hat lol

Viper · M

Technical it's not official until congress certifies the electoral college, which happens Jan 6th, I believe.

But really, there is nothing currently for them to hang their hat on to really argue with facts.

That being said, I've said from the beginning, all these different land marks of when it might change are bullshit... there are only two ways this election might change

1) They find real proof of mass fraud ACCORDING to an active judge and their court room, and most likely muliple court room and judges would need to agree, which none, not even the conservative ones have said they'd been show anything close to proof yet.

2) US Congress refuses just certify the state elections. Where they can't make Trump win, but they can effective knock Biden out.

Of course, I believe (I'm not certain, but I believe) this could set up the Speaker of House to set a vote, and in theory they could set the vote for Jan 21st, 2025... meaning the next election winner to be certified becomes President.

What happens in the mean time? The Speaker of the House becomes ACTING President. Which has been Nancy.

So if I'm correct, even if Trump gets his way of stopping Biden from being President... doesn't nessarily mean he gets to stay President.

And Republican might have a choice, everything is normal and go with Biden, or black eye on American history during their watch and the possibility Nancy might become Acting President because they refused to certify the election. I don't think they like that.

LeopoldBloom · M

@Viper Trump's term ends at noon on Jan. 20. There is no legal way to extend it, other than him winning the election. So you're correct, if there is no president on that date, Nancy Pelosi becomes acting president.

There is also no constitutional mechanism to re-do the election. If it were proven that the election was so fraudulent as to be meaningless, and Congress refused to recognize the electoral votes (or there are no electoral votes), then Pelosi would serve as president for the next four years until the next election.

However, none of this will happen as no evidence of fraud has been presented in court. Everything will proceed as planned and Biden will be sworn in.

Uhohuhoh · 51-55, C

The election itself (and Trump's defeat ) was , thankfully, over ages ago.
For how long we continue to suffer the effects of the shit storm his claims have stirred up remains to be seen. Incredible after the last 4 years that that many people still voted for him . And worrying

bookerdana · M

meanwhile hes collected huge cash reserves he can use any way he wants from people who think hes using it to prove fraud

SW-User

That just means to can run again to clean up Biden’s mess 🤷‍♀️

View 15 more replies »

SW-User

@BetweenKittensandRiots you’re going to catch up with Trumpy in no time at this rate

BetweenKittensandRiots · 36-40, MVIP

@SW-User No, I am sorry.

I didnt read that too carefully. I have now done so and you were right. Can we move on?

BetweenKittensandRiots · 36-40, MVIP

@SW-User One thing Trumpstilskin would never do is apologize.

Elessar · 26-30, M

There'll be a lot of crybabies from that faction starting from January, you can bet on it.

helenS · 36-40, F

Would it be legal for the Suppreme Court to declare the elections in all states null and void because of "voter fraud"? Or just in those states where Biden won?

View 3 more replies »

Uachtarain · 26-30, M

@helenS I wouldn’t know to be fair.

LeopoldBloom · M

@helenS Only if there was no dispute over the facts. The Supreme Court rules on questions of law, not evidentiary disputes.

helenS · 36-40, F

@LeopoldBloom Thank you, for this important comment.

TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 41-45, MVIP

Lolz

View 1 more replies »

TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 41-45, MVIP

@Uachtarain I’m having a ball 🍿
This is you gaslighting yourself.. it’s awesome
Awesome to witness 🕺🏻👍
[image deleted]

LeopoldBloom · M

@Uachtarain He’s another Trump Dead-Ender.

Uachtarain · 26-30, M

@LeopoldBloom Agreed. I’ll sit and watch him lose the plot slowly but surely 🍿 🕺👍

JT123 · M

You trying to convince us or yourself?

View 7 more replies »

Uachtarain · 26-30, M

@JT123 your turn? What am I sucking up? 😂

LeopoldBloom · M

@JT123 Can you explain how Trump gets a second term? Be specific.

Regarding the "Russia hoax," we know Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 election by posting countless fake news stories on social media. Whether these influenced enough people to swing the election is doubtful. In 2020, Facebook effectively policed these fake news accounts and deleted most of them, so if Russia tried the same thing again, it had even less of an effect.

The question was whether Trump or someone on his team coordinated this with Russia, which would have been illegal. There were several meetings between Russian agents and Trump campaign operatives. We still don't know what was discussed at those meetings. When President Biden releases the unredacted Mueller report, we'll find out.

So was there Russian interference in 2016? Yes, but it probably had no effect. Were there fraudulent ballots cast in 2020? Probably, but again, not enough to have an effect, according to AG Barr. Also, voting irregularities are on both sides, so they tend to cancel each other out. The only instances found so far have involved Republicans.

Viper · M

@JT123 Yes, I remember the Russian collusion, do you actually remember it?

Because people didn't refuse to believe the facts that someone clearly won the election with 306 points in the electoral college...

The party that lost didn't make up lies about fraud, despite less paper audit trail that they put in place for 2020

People didn't try get legislators to break their state constitutions to change the results

People didn't demand the governors to call a session to over throw the vote

People didn't ask judges to disenfranchising entire state, just because they lost...

[b]The Russian collusion was a lot of whining and complaining, but it wasn't asking for people to take additional illegal actions nor throw out American democracy like the currently bullshit going on.

2016 they quickly accepted the results of the election, 2020 the head of America is still asking others to take illegal actions as he won't accept reality... two very different things[/b]

Uachtarain · 26-30, M

@revenant I’m going on your past comments where you make it clear that you “dislike” Muslims and especially Africans. It’s not hard to figure out why you think Evil is coming.

revenant · F

@Uachtarain really ? you made that up

Uachtarain · 26-30, M

@revenant I wish I did. But no.

deadgerbil · 22-25

Lol that crazy lady blocked me.

KaraLuvz · 46-50, T

As if it was ever in doubt

BetweenKittensandRiots · 36-40, MVIP

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2CxDu7jiyE]

Add a comment...