dancingtongue · 80-89, M
The basic concept of taxation is providing a stable financial base for funding needed community services unlikely to have a sufficient profit incentive for private enterprises, or to enlist consistent donations. Prime examples being fire and police departments, roads and other infrastructure where people give little thought to paying for them until they need them.
The basic concept of donations -- and the tax-deductions underwriting them -- is to encourage people to help non-profits targeted on specific needs largely unmet or underfunded by government.
So the answer to your question is no -- funding the government on donations alone would only encourage even more free-loaders than already exist, particularly in the upper economic levels. If I have problems with my taxes, it is how politicians are electing to spend it; not trying to save a buck because starving the beast does not work. It just cuts preventive maintenance and other programs, which leads to higher expenses and crumbling infrastructure. And I will continue to donate to non-profits that address specific needs that resonate with me.
The basic concept of donations -- and the tax-deductions underwriting them -- is to encourage people to help non-profits targeted on specific needs largely unmet or underfunded by government.
So the answer to your question is no -- funding the government on donations alone would only encourage even more free-loaders than already exist, particularly in the upper economic levels. If I have problems with my taxes, it is how politicians are electing to spend it; not trying to save a buck because starving the beast does not work. It just cuts preventive maintenance and other programs, which leads to higher expenses and crumbling infrastructure. And I will continue to donate to non-profits that address specific needs that resonate with me.
unregisteredhypercam4 · 22-25, M
If they were a good government then yes
Theyitis · 36-40, M
Uh no, if we didn’t have taxes I hope I would abandon that country and find one whose government has not been entirely destroyed.
Justmeraeagain · 56-60, F
Pftft ...🤨
MasterLee · 56-60, M
Hell no. They give it away.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
GuyWithOpinions · 31-35, M
@jshm2 thats my point. If it wasnt manditory would you donate to your government or let the infrastructure crumble? Would you then want to pay?How would that change society?
EldritchFox · 41-45, F
Not to my government
Softandsweet2 · 36-40, F
If we didn’t have taxes, we wouldn’t have a government.
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
If you didn't have taxes you probably would not have a government or anything resembling a basic level of civil society.
GoFish ·
probably not
PatientlyWaiting25 · 46-50, F
Nope. They don't seem to be able to organize a piss up in a brewery. Massive let down. At least the Tories managed cheese and wine parties.
Gibbon · 70-79, M
You can't be serious














