Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I guess Amazon almost did a hostile an political act...

For showing the customer which taxes they have to pay to the US governement in tariff-revenue.

Everyone can see the sales taxes on their bills... But I guess showing the tax that the current president is levying on your products is a "hostile act".

Wonder why that is... mmmm what can it be? 🤔

But no worries, your "taxes" will go down... because the big tax on consumers is "regulation", according to David Wessel. The cost of knowing that your products are safe to use, the cost that you pay to have the employees that make your product have a safe work enviorment. That's the real cost on consumers. I wonder when these people are going to cry foul when other countries refuse to import there unregulated food products in other countries?

But for now, know that a business that sells products from all over the world is forbidden to inform it's customers why the price of their commodity went up due to a deliberate tax by the governement. Because informing the public, is a hostile act.
Top | New | Old
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
For those people commenting on what Amazon did or did not do... I honestly don't care. I don't care if they were planning to do it, I don't care if they backed down.

What is important to me, is that you have a governement, that comes out to say that informing the public on why certain products increased due to a tax, are labeled "a hostile act". Just think about that. How is it a hostile act, to put the added tax as a seperate item on someones bill?

And for everyone on here that compares this with inflation caused by supply chain issues or companies raising there prices... what are you talking about? None of that money went to the governement. Even the inflation due to supply chain issues, goes directly to the company. It's not a tax, it's a private business setting prices. But a tariff? That doesn't go to the business, that's something you as a customer are paying extra because of a political descision. And neither the governement nor the MAGA-zombie-squad, want you to be informed about that.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Kwek00 So we must return to the old ways, right?

@Kwek00 Anyone that doesn't agree with the self-proclaimed "Stable Genius" is considered to be "The enemy from within".

Since he has been in office this year it has cost $300M for him to play golf.

Sen.R Dan Goldman Slingshot News on MSN 1h
Zaphod42 · 51-55, M
They’re not the only ones… The company my girlfriend works for has started putting the exact amount of the tariffs on each in-house invoice.
@Zaphod42 they deny having reported any costs from the tarrifs. . But y'all do like fiction! Together. Bipartisan.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
"This is a hostile and political act by Amazon," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Tuesday. "Why didn't Amazon do this when the Biden administration hiked inflation to the highest level in 40 years?"

The reported plan by Amazon came as Trump imposed sweeping tariffs on scores of U.S. trading partners, and 145% tariffs on some products from China in a softened stance on some tech and auto products.

But Amazon said the idea was "never approved" and "is not going to happen."

"Teams discuss ideas all the time," Amazon spokesperson Tim Doyle wrote in a statement.

According to Doyle, the Amazon team that runs its ultra-low cost Amazon Haul store allegedly "considered" the idea of listing import charges on "certain products."

In the press briefing, Leavitt cited and held up a copy of a 2021 report that showed Amazon founder Jeff Bezos which purported ties with a so-called "Chinese propaganda arm" that alleged Amazon complied with a Chinese government order preventing customers from rating President Xi Jinping's government-published book.

Leavitt said it was "another reason why Americans should buy American."
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@sunsporter1649
What measures did the Biden administration take to "hike inflation"?
Good luck making that argument.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
He has such a thin skin. Publishing those figures would be a useful service to the consumer and taxpayer. He needs to accept responsibility for his decisions.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@sunsporter1649 I wonder why my car insurance company didn’t tell me why my rates skyrocketed ? Some friends tell me it’s to make up for all the uninsured drivers .(robbing Peter to subsidize Paul ).
Crazywaterspring · 61-69, M
@AthrillatheHunt In this area other drivers are drunk, armed and uninsured. Carrying uninsured motorist is a necessity.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@Crazywaterspring carried by whom?
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
Almost never counts. I almost sent you a million dollars. Swear. lol
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
MarineBob · 56-60, M
Show me a company that won't waive that added tax
@MarineBob Amazon, of course! They deny having released such figures. But you believe!!! Y'all buh leeeeve together, United forever! Stick with that!
Pretzel · 70-79, M
So showing the sales tax is okay?
Amazon denies having shown you that.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Roundandroundwego I'm sorry... but I don't care. The governement has reacted to it anyway. And now everyone can see what their opinion is. What Amazon would or would not have done, is of no importance to the stance that the US governement took on this issue.
@Kwek00 and Black Stone is funding the "hands off" anti oligarchs protests.
It's good that you don't care. Can't contextualize. Together as a nation. Gahead. Your country is reacting to fiction instead of having a plan, in every field. Gahead!!! Timber!!;;
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment