Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Do you tend to focus more on the figure of a leader or on the ideology/system implemented by a country?

MarkPaul · 26-30, M
A leader's behaviour and actions count more, but that doesn't mean his figure is irrelevant. In my experience as somewhat of a political consultant, I would tell me clients you need to have both form and substance to have any relevance.
icedeathshogun · 22-25
@MarkPaul I don't understand what you mean by 'figure' and 'form and substance' here, if you don't mind explaining further?
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@icedeathshogun

Form = Image, performance, showmanship.
Substance = Actions, behaviour, outcome.
Their ideology and their plan to implement that system is most important.

That being said a charismatic leader who knows how to get their message across and work a crowd is important.


You can have the greatest idea but if listening to you is like nails on a chalkboard it won't get traction.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
Much more ideology than person. The fact is that the human is a failure. The only option is who best represents the ideology I hold. Thus Trump is a terrible candidate but is much much better than Kamala, Biden or Hillary.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
Grasp of the problems the country faces.
Ideas in how to tackle them.

I'm not interested in personality or rhetoric along party lines.
4meAndyou · F
Ideology. Leaders are very important, but it they don't support my favored ideology, they are useless to me.
Cierzo · M
The leader. Ideologies are just a tool.
PalteseMalconFunch · 36-40, T
Leaders die. Systems remain.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@CountScrofula I agree to a degree. But if you have someone like Ben Stein pushing your ideology or system and you are just going to bore people into a slumber no matter what.

 
Post Comment