Democrats are throwing an "abortion-palooza" in Chicago for the Democratic National Convention.
"They’re degrading human life and women for that matter. It's just absolutely disgusting. This continued celebration of abortion," Democrats For Life of America executive director Kristen Day told Fox News Digital.
Day is appalled that Planned Parenthood is offering free abortions inside a "mobile health clinic" parked in Chicago during the convention. Pro-abortion activists also marched through the streets of Chicago ahead of the convention.
"I think this convention is going to be abortion-palooza. In response to them providing abortions, we would provide actual support to women in need. So, we started a diaper drive," Day said.
You think I (or FoxNews) could possibly make up something so horrific?
About the only positive in this monstrous story is the fact that the mobile baby killing unit is preventing future welfare bums and Democrat Voters from being born. In some way, (using the logic of the Eugenics Mother of Planned Babykillinghood, Margaret Sanger) this company is indeed eliminating "human weeds."
It’s a good strategy because a large majority of Americans support abortion rights. People like you who want ten year old rape victims to give birth at gunpoint are fortunately in the minority.
The horrible Dobbs decision may have one positive outcome - electing Harris/Walz and a Democratic Congress, which can then pass a national law protecting the right to abortion. Congress can then strip the Supreme Court from having jurisdiction over any laws dealing with reproductive rights.
Democrats used to be afraid to bring up abortion. Not anymore. Now it’s Republicans who are equivocating. Even Cheeto Benito says he won’t sign a nationwide abortion ban if he’s elected.
That "State" bs is what the older gal from WSJ spoke of when Roe was overturned, as a panel member on MTP--"It's back where it ought to be: the States."
HUH? The Federal government never had it; Roe gave this very intimate right to the PEOPLE. Overturning Roe wrested it from the hands of "the People" to give it back to the States...even though abortion had been declining...
The Republican Party loves to forget that the MAIN party to the Constitution is mentioned FIRST.
@SomeMichGuy That was one of the arguments against Roe for the last 50 years - that abortion should be decided by the states. But anyone who thinks it's going to stop there is deluded. The anti-abortion forces are already talking about using the Comstock Act to prohibit the interstate shipment of mifepristone and surgical tools used for abortions, which would effectively make it impossible to have an abortion, even in states where it's legal. If conservatives think Trump won't support this, they shouldn't vote for him.
It's bad enough the DemonRats are all about violence toward anyone who opposes their vile agenda, but the way they celebrate the brutal murder of innocent babies is absolute evil.
@AbbeyRhode Definitely evil. It's really hard to imagine a candidate moving further to the left than Bill KKKlinton, (who wanted to keep abortion "safe, legal and rare") to the FemiNazi KKKamala who pushes "with Kamala Harris, it’s abortion first"
@Reason10 Dude, you built a whole house of cards on top of one phrase taken out of context. Putting the phrase in context knocks down your house of cards. That is a fact to which you are allergic!!
... addressing accusations of racism levelled against Sanger brought up her 1939 letter, saying that while the passage quoted above was “inartfully written” it was “frequently taken out of context to suggest Sanger was seeking to exterminate blacks.”
Your Sanger quote is equivalent to quoting Nixon as saying "I am ... a crook"!!
And then you say
MOST people do not agree with abortion for the sole purpose of a high school slut looking good in her prom dress.
Fact is, nearly 60% of women seeking abortion in the US are already mothers.
And one more fact that seems to have escaped your notice: Baby Molly can teach you the difference between an embryo and a living person.
Kylie Beaton, a woman from Texas ... But at her 20-week ultrasound appointment, the couple learned that the fetus had a rare, severe condition -- called alobar holoprosencephaly -- in which the baby's brain does not develop into two hemispheres. Her baby's head was not developing brain tissue and was filling with fluid.
Texas has a near total abortion ban in effect that doesn't make exceptions for cases of fatal fetal anomalies. Beaton's doctors told her that their hands were tied; she would have to carry her pregnancy to term.
...
At the time, she called carrying a baby and knowing he would not live, "torture."
After having an emergency cesarean section and spending several days in the hospital, Beaton and her husband took their son home. He died hours later, the couple told ABC News.
According to a lawsuit that Beaton joined, the couple watched their son grow cold in their arms until he died. He could not be held in an upright position, or it would put too much pressure on his head, which was abnormally large. When Beaton delivered, the circumference of her baby's head was measuring at 49 cm; the average head circumference for a newborn is 35 cm, according to the suit.
Do you agree with the Texas statute here? Why put a woman at risk this way??
Baby's heartbeat can be heard as early as the twelfth week of pregnancy
So does that mean you're OK with abortion thru week 11 of pregnancy?
Also, with the Texas couple, their fetus had a heartbeat and practically zero brain. So it doesn't seem like heartbeat alone is sufficient to make the decision.
@DogMan Because killing a pregnant woman is a crime against her, compounded by the pregnancy. What you people can't seem to wrap your heads around is that a pregnant woman is a woman, not just a vessel for the ZEF.
It amazes me that the right says they want to protect children, but if a ten year old girl is raped, they want to force her to give birth.
@BizSuitStacy It's like, you don't know what you are talking about... again.
December 10, 1939
Dr. C. J. Gamble 255 Adams Street Milton, Mass
Dear Doctor Gamble: It's good to know that you are recovering. I also am stepping up and have felt much better the past week
Miss Delp was here for Thanksgiving and I am more than delighted to learn that she was able to get $250.00 from the California Birth Control organization plus the $600.00 from the Federation. That's good; she is a go-getter and a live wire, very tactful and charming as well. I think that my pick of her has been justified, even though she is a little higher priced than the ordinary. She has been working on the article to be written by Miriam de Ford (Mrs. Maynard Shipley). They were good enough to send me a rough draft for comments and suggestions, and the important suggestion that I made was not to include Miss Delp's actual name in the article, because of the fact that her sister is married to one of the high spots in the Farm Security Department and if the enemy started to work on her name they might make it difficult along the line; otherwise I think the article is good
As to my sending suggestions to the Federation: I think it is really unfair for me to do so. I am too far away to have the personal contact of the different reactions and it only holds up any definite project to have the pros and cons battered about which makes for more chaos and confusion
There is only one thing that I would like to be in touch with and that is the Negro Project of the South which, if the execution of the details remain in Miss Rose's hands, my suggestions will not be confusing because she knows the way my mind works
Miss Rose sent me a copy of your letter of December 5th and I note that you doubt it worthwhile to employ a full time Negro physician. It seems to me from my experience where I have been in North Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee and Texas, that while the colored Negroes have great respect for white doctors they can get closer to their own members and more or less lay their cards on the table which means their ignorance, superstitions and doubts. They do not do this with the white people and if we can train the Negro doctor at the Clinic he can go among them with enthusiasm and with knowledge, which, I believe, will have far-reaching results among the colored people. His work in my opinion should be entirely with the Negro profession and the nurses, hospital, social workers, as well as the County's white doctors. His success will depend upon his personality and his training by us
The ministers work is also important and also he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members
I agree with you that Miss Rose has done a remarkable job in thinking thru and planning the Project but she has worked on it for sometime. As soon as I knew there was the possibility of getting any money I put her at work drafting the plan for Mr. Lackner. She is excellent at just such a job. She hangs on to details, weaves and corrulates them into the design. I shall never cease to have the utmost admiration and regard for her ability, and so far I have not seen anyone in the Federation who could take her place
I am constantly delighted at the thought that you are getting better and now we must pray for Mrs. Timme who is seriously ill at the Doctors' Hospital in New York
My regards to your Sarah and to yourself
Sincerely yours MS/mh Margaret Sanger
... That's what happens when you get your education from memes.
"Planned Parenthood is offering free abortions inside a "mobile health clinic" parked in Chicago during the convention." More like Chinese Execution Vans where the van pulls up to your house conveniently equipped with an execution chamber all ready to administer lethal injections.
Yep, eugenics queen Margaret Sanger was revered by Killary and Obummer. He clearly knew Sanger's plan was to wipe out his own race yet supported her goals anyway.
scotus already declared that this was a state issue, as it is NOT included in the constitution.
The Constitution never makes abortion illegal; and it was a process known to the Founders and authors of the Constitution. In fact, Ben Franklin gave instructions on at-home abortions in a book in the 1700s. https://www.npr.org/2022/05/18/1099542962/abortion-ben-franklin-roe-wade-supreme-court-leak Because the Constitution doesn't make abortion illegal, it is therefore Constitutional.
Thus the Dobbs decision suddenly ruling abortion unconstitutional is a situation similar to prohibition. With prohibition, an activist court decided alcohol was "unconstitutional," and thus created a nation of scofflaws.
Which begs the question: has Dobbs lowered the abortion rate at all? Or is it just creating a nation of scofflaws??
@Gibbon No. It makes you feel better to pretend that "both sides are the same", etc., but it's demonstrably not true.
You and a number of other supporters of DJT are routinely shown facts which are easily verifiable, but refuse to do so, because you reject any source which disagrees with you, and will find one online bozo with no expertise and ignore the recognized experts.
In answer, you offer claims which are either unverifiable or simply wrong...like the bright guy who went crazy about a story he never read, providing a link, and claiming that GA election officials found that Trump won the 2020 election.
The actual story was that Trump waa verified as having won this year's (2024's) Republican primary, using the same machines used to count the 2020 Presidential election. The news release was put out by Brad Raffensperger, likely to help show that there is no problem with the machines counting votes.
That sums up the sort of evidence seen here from DJT supporters.
@SomeMichGuy If can remember anything I've never directly defended Trump directly and have stated it in the past. I'm voting conservative because I can't stand the the social and economic damage this administration did to our country. Don't even try to sell me any BS that this is a better economy your wasting your breath. And the intential screwing up kids minds about gender is a disgusting federal government agenda. You will never sell their immortality to me. But you shouldn't what I think because my vote is wasted living a state that is mostly red by real estate size but controlled the blue Metropolitan idiots. My groceries are like everyone else. Nearly twice the price before Biden came in, while he also f-cked everyone opening the border. Price gouging doesn't sell when its obvious shutting the country down caused the beginning of this economic mess you guys call success. No nothing I've said is correct because you believe I'm a Trumpster. Which I'm not.
If they want birth control so bad, march them into a room and give them all a good dose of gamma radiation; permanent sterilization, problem solved.
Nobody but the Catholic Church is opposed to birth control. (Maybe the raghead Muslims, too. Who knows?)
And the Catholics might have changed since the Sixties.
I can't see exposing someone to cancer (with gamma rays) when there are plenty of CHEAP alternatives on the market. Hell, you can find cheap condoms at Walmart. You don't even have to go to a drug store.
Birth control is reasonable and sensible for those who do not want to have children, (or those who want to be protected against STDs.)
It's not degrading life, more strict abortion laws lead to higher all cause female mortality and birth deaths. If anything, pro lifers cause more deaths, not less.
@SatanBurger Pro abortion folks have successfully killed 60 million babies, and by far the highest percentage was black babies. Why doesn't the left care about that fact?
Oh yeah, because that is the main reason Margaret Sanger started PP.
@DogMan I don't define abortion as murder, it's factually wrong for many reasons. Killing the already born like high mortality women and child death rates in anti abortion countries, I do define as murder.
4.2.1.2 “Abortion kills babies and children.”
Classifying fetuses as babies or children obscures any potentially relevant moral differences between, say, a 6-week old fetus and a 6-day old baby or 6-year old child. This claim assumes that fetuses – at any stage of development – and babies are the same sort of entity. This claim involves loaded emotional language, is inaccurate and is question-begging, as we discussed above in the section on definitions: this saying doesn’t contribute to a good argument.
(1) Fetuses are biologically alive. (2) All things that are biologically alive are wrong to kill. (3) Therefore, fetuses are wrong to kill.
The second premise, however, is obviously false: uncontroversial examples show it. Mold, bacteria, mosquitos and plants are biologically alive, but they aren’t wrong to kill. So, just as acknowledging that abortion involves killing doesn’t mean that abortion is wrong, recognizing that biological life begins at conception doesn’t mean that abortion is wrong either.
Now, perhaps people really mean something like “morally significant life” or “life with rights,” but that’s not people what say: if that’s what they mean, they should say that.
200 + years from now, people will look back on abortion as a barbaric abomination.
They will vilify the barbaric left, and judge them by the new standards of the day, just like the left is doing now. All statues for pro abortion democrats will be torn down, and history books will rewrite history.
@Reason10 Good job REVERSING Sanger's meaning by taking it out of context.
The quote is real and appears in a Dec. 10, 1939 letter to a program director advocating employing Black physicians and ministers to gain trust of the communities the program was meant to serve.
Sanger’s concern was to avoid a suspicion that the program’s objective was to stop Black people having babies, which having white people in charge could create.
She wrote: “The minister's work is also important and he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
... addressing accusations of racism levelled against Sanger brought up her 1939 letter, saying that while the passage quoted above was “inartfully written” it was “frequently taken out of context to suggest Sanger was seeking to exterminate blacks.”
Your Sanger quote is equivalent to quoting Nixon as saying "I am ... a crook"!!
You have always impressed me as a soul who is physically ALLERGIC to facts, to science, to history.
Sanger (who was HItlary's idol) wasn't the first proponent of Eugenics. (I'd suggest you looking it up, but apparently that branch of science is way beyond your blue state second grade education.) Eugenics was created by Frances Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin. Eugenics was created from "The Origin Of Species" and "The Descent of Man," by Charles Darwin.
This monstrosity first came about in the early 20th Century. Other proponents of Eugenics included Oliver Wendell Holmes, Woodrow Wilson, George Bernard Shaw, etc.
A GENERATION of black women were subjected to forced STERILIZATION based on the policies of Eugenics, and Margaret Sanger. If you somehow believe blacks are INFERIOR to Caucasians, then you agree with her views.
The Germans took Sanger's philosophies and turned them into the HOLOCAUST.
Yes, amazing the mental gymnastics leftists voluntarily go through to rationalize their diametrically opposed thought processes in order to comply with DemonRat policies. Worthy of at least a silver medal in the latest Weirdo Olympics.
