Democrats are throwing an "abortion-palooza" in Chicago for the Democratic National Convention.
"They’re degrading human life and women for that matter. It's just absolutely disgusting. This continued celebration of abortion," Democrats For Life of America executive director Kristen Day told Fox News Digital.
Day is appalled that Planned Parenthood is offering free abortions inside a "mobile health clinic" parked in Chicago during the convention. Pro-abortion activists also marched through the streets of Chicago ahead of the convention.
"I think this convention is going to be abortion-palooza. In response to them providing abortions, we would provide actual support to women in need. So, we started a diaper drive," Day said.
You think I (or FoxNews) could possibly make up something so horrific?
About the only positive in this monstrous story is the fact that the mobile baby killing unit is preventing future welfare bums and Democrat Voters from being born. In some way, (using the logic of the Eugenics Mother of Planned Babykillinghood, Margaret Sanger) this company is indeed eliminating "human weeds."
And REMEMBER, HItlary admired this monster.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
It's not degrading life, more strict abortion laws lead to higher all cause female mortality and birth deaths. If anything, pro lifers cause more deaths, not less.
@SatanBurger Pro abortion folks have successfully killed 60 million babies, and by far the highest percentage was black babies. Why doesn't the left care about that fact?
Oh yeah, because that is the main reason Margaret Sanger started PP.
@DogMan I don't define abortion as murder, it's factually wrong for many reasons. Killing the already born like high mortality women and child death rates in anti abortion countries, I do define as murder.
4.2.1.2 “Abortion kills babies and children.”
Classifying fetuses as babies or children obscures any potentially relevant moral differences between, say, a 6-week old fetus and a 6-day old baby or 6-year old child. This claim assumes that fetuses – at any stage of development – and babies are the same sort of entity. This claim involves loaded emotional language, is inaccurate and is question-begging, as we discussed above in the section on definitions: this saying doesn’t contribute to a good argument.
(1) Fetuses are biologically alive. (2) All things that are biologically alive are wrong to kill. (3) Therefore, fetuses are wrong to kill.
The second premise, however, is obviously false: uncontroversial examples show it. Mold, bacteria, mosquitos and plants are biologically alive, but they aren’t wrong to kill. So, just as acknowledging that abortion involves killing doesn’t mean that abortion is wrong, recognizing that biological life begins at conception doesn’t mean that abortion is wrong either.
Now, perhaps people really mean something like “morally significant life” or “life with rights,” but that’s not people what say: if that’s what they mean, they should say that.
