198 Democrats vote in favor of election interference.

Stop drinking the Kool-Aid. This is an attempt to prevent American citizens from voting. There is already a law on the books and there is zero reason to add the onerous requirements of this law.

I might feel differently if there was voter fraud... there isn't and that is a proven fact.

Sorry, but the law is actually designed to prevent people from voting, period.

A lot of Americans don't have proof of citizenship documentation. A real ID drivers' license, a Tribal ID, or a military ID would be unacceptable unless coupled with additional documentation, such as a birth certificate or an extract from a birth record that proves the applicant was born in the United States.

This means that for countless Americans, including military voters, Native voters, people who have changed their names (including tens of millions of American women), the elderly, the young, the poor, and naturalized citizens, who are ALL Americans, it's going to be harder for them to vote..

And I'm also sure it's a coincidence that most of the people that the law would impact are more likely to vote Democrat.

The same party that pushed for vaccine passports are against voter ID laws. The complete irrationality of that is incredible

It is just another attempt at voter suppression, so Republicans can practice minority rule. Voter fraud is exceedingly rare, and even in those rare instances there is no evidence that any elections have been impacted. But false Republican claims allow them to pass bogus legislation about imagined issues instead of addressing real issues that face the country.

Look, I'm all in favor of voter ID, AS LONG AS they also make it free and easy to OBTAIN voter ID.

Without the free and easy part, this is just voter suppression of the poor and elderly.
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/challenge-obtaining-voter-identification

"Voter ID laws have been estimated by the U.S. Government Accountability Office to reduce voter turnout by 2-3 percentage points, translating to tens of thousands of votes lost in a single state." https://www.aclu.org/news/civil-liberties/block-the-vote-voter-suppression-in-2020/

Do I even have to debunk this? We all know this is just another way to stop citizens from voting, right?

Also, it's pretty deranged to say a foreign government interfering in our elections is the same as people who live here voting in said elections. Who cares if they're not citizens? They live here, they work here, they're part of the country.

Nothing wrong with requiring ID to vote.We should need to provide that information, there are plenty of ways to get an ID that would prove your citizenship.

You are absolutely correct that this hurts the Democrats at the voting booth and is the only reason they oppose it.

Keep rolling out that old GOP joke about illegal immigrants voting en masse. EVERY investigation into voting irregularities, including those run by GOPers, has found the there is little to no illegal voting -- and as often as not the few cases found are GOP voters doing the cheating.

Democrat since 2016.

I agree with the law to a large extent. I'd like to see it be easier to prove citizenship (like more easily, cost-free ways to obtain said proof). But with that said, I think it is more important to have only citizens voting. And ultimately it will just have to be the individual's responsibility to prove their citizenship.

To deny all allegations of foreign interference with elections would be ignorant. It happens. And it goes both ways. Of course Russia wanted Trump in 2016. Even if they didn't know him (which obviously they did), Hillary had a track record of disliking them - and would extend the Obama policy on the area. But Hillary sure as shit did help that thing along by being an idiot with the private e-mail account.

Similarly there will be countries interfering against Trump. I would be surprised if none of the US allies tries to see what they can do to support the Democrat campaign. Democrats are more predictable from a policy perspective.

You scared me! You didn't mention that the House PASSED the bill 221 to 198.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-house-passes-bill-requiring-234752354.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall

Election interference is okay if it helps you, but intolerable if it helps the other side. Why can’t we just agree to have none of it?

You spin that just like Fox News would - maybe you can get a job there.