Fun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
jeancolby · 31-35, F
Imagine what the rest got.
Zaphod42 · 46-50, M
@jeancolby I love that Nikki Haley claimed there were only two choices as she came in third 😂
jeancolby · 31-35, F
@Zaphod42 Yeah, she obviously can't count.

whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
When you look at the non Trump options within the Republican party no one should be surprised. The whole zoo is a leper colony. (With profound apologies to all the lepers out there)😷
@whowasthatmaskedman When it comes to economics, all of the Republicans are the same. However, Chris Christie was one of those rare Republicans who was still attached to reality. Same goes for Romney, McCain, Cheney, Ryan, and so on. All of their economic policies are dogshit, but they aren't anti-reality and anti-democracy, like the rest of the trumpian GOP.
ViciDraco · 36-40, M
@whowasthatmaskedman @BohemianBoo I don't like Chris Christie. But I feel like he's a person I can actually agree to disagree with. I don't think I'd like the direction his policies would take us. But I don't feel like his policies would be outright destructive to the fabric of our nation. They would be things we could recover from in time with good course correction. A lot of these other candidates are actually dangerous to the national identity and stability as a whole.
@ViciDraco Yeah, we've always recovered from bad economic policy. But losing democracy isn't something we're just going to fix in another four years.
Burke17 · 61-69, M
You can play this same exact numbers game with any politician in USA. Why? Because voter apathy is massive. Your comment is invalid, and it shows you just hate Trump. That is fine, but don't play with numbers that apply to all, left, right, or centrist.
@Burke17 Caucuses are a special case; they present a particularly high barrier to participating and getting your vote counted. And that's why, traditionally, New Hampshire, the first actual ballot, is considered more representative than the Iowa caucuses. In fact, Iowa's actual primary isn't until June 4, these caucuses are merely a beauty contest.
@Burke17 My comment is very valid. If as an ex-prez you can't get the electorate in a Red state excited enough to back you by any more than 7.2%..........underwhelming is spot on.
There actually are a lot of Republican voters who don't like Trump. The problem is that these people still pale in comparison to the rest of the traditionally Republican voters, plus they don't care enough to vote against Trump. These people should have been voting for Nikki Haley, instead a lot of them just didn't vote.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@BohemianBoo I agree with every word you are saying. But convincing those in power to give up that power is often a problem involving desperate measures. Like revolution. 😷
@whowasthatmaskedman That's why we need to focus on local change. It's all so much easier said than done, but it has been done.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@BohemianBoo We agree again. But I know it will be slow. Too slow. And probably come as the result of some less than favourable change..😷
Here's a bit more contextual info: Iowa republican caucuses picked FOUR LOSERS IN A ROW in the most recent 4 caucuses!!

2008 - Mike Huckabee
2012 - Rick Santorum
2016 - Ted Cruz
2020 - Donald Trump
luckranger71 · 51-55, M
An ultra right-wing white guy got 51% of the vote in a[b] Republican [/b]primary in [b]Iowa[/b].

Too bad Mike Wallace isn't around anymore to investigate 😂
Zaphod42 · 46-50, M
What they’re also not saying that while, yes, that’s the biggest win for a non incumbent ever in that state, the fact that he’s a former president sorta makes that an abysmal showing.
Northwest · M
It really doesn't matter. The GOP is committed to backing the winer of the primaries, caucuses included. This means Trump.

The polls show a very divided Democrat field, and there will be multiple third party candidates, with some deep pockets. There's at last one very well financed PAC, that's feeding funds to 3rd party non-GOP candidates, to help Trump win.

The system needs to be reformed, but both parties refused to do it, for fear of being the party that blinks first.
Elessar · 26-30, M
50% of the people we asked support Trump!

(I asked two people)
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
And here we go around and around.
If this is indicative on a national scale youre about to see a President elected with 30% vote share when only 2/3 of the country bothered to turn out and vote.

Somethings not right somewhere
@Picklebobble2 Voter turnout even for presidential elections is traditionally low. In 2020 approximately 60% of eligible Americans voted. The figure of those that voted in 2020...was the highest percentage to ever vote in a presidential election. By all accounts the record turnout was less to election Biden than it was to make sure trump did not win a second term based on the number of crossover votes in traditional Red areas of various key states. At least 5 key states went from solid Red to Purple....and two Red states went to very Blue in 2020.
SW-User
Don't get your hopes up Iowans be some crazy trump lovin crazy crazy crazies
nice spin.. reagan had the biggest with in Iowa with 12%.
trump smashed that after 4 indictments and all the dems/uniparty crap.
the ppl have spoken.
get ready to REEEEEEEE in 25
luckranger71 · 51-55, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout Keep dreaming. Iowa Republicans may be even less representative of the US than you are, as a Trump loving "Australian".
@luckranger71 REEEEEEEEEEE
RedBaron · M
But that’s reflective of the general election turnout as well, so he might very well win in November anyway.
@RedBaron Hang onto that thought. ;-) ;-) It worked out great in 2020, huh?
RedBaron · M
@anythingoes477 I wasn’t unhappy with that result, but Biden is a weaker candidate this time around.
@RedBaron We'll see.
He's an incumbent in a primary and only won half the vote of republican voters. So he basically lost votes since the last general election.
Thevy29 · 41-45, M
Didn't he only get in the first time cause only 11% of voters actually voted? Not like when Biden got in were 70% showed up to vote.
Neoerectus · M
Reps are only 40% of IA voters, so 2.9% of Iowa voters
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
Yeah, but what about the size of the crowd?
jehova · 31-35, M
Well thats fun.
ViciDraco · 36-40, M
Touting the 14.4% number doesn't do much without providing the numbers for previous primaries

 
Post Comment