View 3 more replies »
How do you define an audit, seriously?
Fragility is an interesting thing to bring up in this context, because I think you'll find that basic concepts like facts, truth and honesty no longer seem to have as much universal meaning as they used to.
I cringe when I hear "speaking my truth," just like I do when I hear people talk about "alternate facts."
"Independent" non- destructive audits and inspections sound great to me, within reason, but you've still got to draw the line at some point when people just want more and more of them and have to wonder about destroying the system being the result and even the motivation.
But bad faith partisan audits (maybe call them "witch hunts" where the subjects of the inquiry get "drowned" or tampered with) are another story.
Call me an elitist, but I don't think every Tom, Dick and Harry (especially those with grudges, political or monetary motivations) should have his or her chance to tamper with the machinery .
That's about as serious as I can get, I think, about a GatewayPundit inspired post.
Fragility is an interesting thing to bring up in this context, because I think you'll find that basic concepts like facts, truth and honesty no longer seem to have as much universal meaning as they used to.
I cringe when I hear "speaking my truth," just like I do when I hear people talk about "alternate facts."
"Independent" non- destructive audits and inspections sound great to me, within reason, but you've still got to draw the line at some point when people just want more and more of them and have to wonder about destroying the system being the result and even the motivation.
But bad faith partisan audits (maybe call them "witch hunts" where the subjects of the inquiry get "drowned" or tampered with) are another story.
Call me an elitist, but I don't think every Tom, Dick and Harry (especially those with grudges, political or monetary motivations) should have his or her chance to tamper with the machinery .
That's about as serious as I can get, I think, about a GatewayPundit inspired post.
ElwoodBlues · M
Your claim is an opinion piece lacking factual evidentiary support
Democrats ARE allowing voting machines to be examined. They are all examined, tested and certified.
New York: https://www.elections.ny.gov/HAVAVotingMachines.html
California: https://www.sos.ca.gov/administration/regulations/current-regulations/elections/voting-system-certification-regulations
New Jersey: https://www.state.nj.us/state/elections/resources-voting-equipment.shtml
Colorado; https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/Resources/files/ElectionFactSheet-ProtectionOfVotingSystems.pdf
How many more states would you like me to list???
Democrats ARE allowing voting machines to be examined. They are all examined, tested and certified.
New York: https://www.elections.ny.gov/HAVAVotingMachines.html
California: https://www.sos.ca.gov/administration/regulations/current-regulations/elections/voting-system-certification-regulations
New Jersey: https://www.state.nj.us/state/elections/resources-voting-equipment.shtml
Colorado; https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/Resources/files/ElectionFactSheet-ProtectionOfVotingSystems.pdf
How many more states would you like me to list???
ElwoodBlues · M
@marke And this pointless lawsuit went nowhere, right?
You ignored my posts about Georgia signature audits, Georgia hand counts, etc, right??
You ignored my posts about Georgia signature audits, Georgia hand counts, etc, right??
marke · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues
Signature verification was a problem in GA but so were missing voting logs and ballot images, meaning tens of thousands of ballots cannot now be verified as legitimate. There is no excuse for missing images and logs required by law for ballot legitimacy verification purposes.
You ignored my posts about Georgia signature audits, Georgia hand counts, etc, right??
Signature verification was a problem in GA but so were missing voting logs and ballot images, meaning tens of thousands of ballots cannot now be verified as legitimate. There is no excuse for missing images and logs required by law for ballot legitimacy verification purposes.
ElwoodBlues · M
@marke An opinion piece lacking factual evidentiary support
graphite · 61-69, M
So they can steal elections. Take away the cheating factor and we Republicans know this election is going to be a wipeout in our favor. But we can't take away the cheating factor. Tuesday night - Republican candidate is winning handily; by Friday morning - Democrat wins.
marke · 70-79, M
@Vin53
More than a few crooks have already been convicted for committing voter fraud in 2020 and more investigations continue.
You don't even have evidence that a crime was committed!
The ONLY thing you have toothless accusations you're desperately praying will find a crime and I'm here to tell you, definitively, its just isn't going to happen.
You're going to your grave never accepting the reality that you and trump are losers.
The ONLY thing you have toothless accusations you're desperately praying will find a crime and I'm here to tell you, definitively, its just isn't going to happen.
You're going to your grave never accepting the reality that you and trump are losers.
More than a few crooks have already been convicted for committing voter fraud in 2020 and more investigations continue.
marke · 70-79, M
@Vin53
You are right about large democrat precincts where democrats control all access to the evidence and refuse to allow republicans access. Republicans have found no evidence of fraud where democrats have been successful in blocking their investigations.
You don't even have evidence that a crime was committed!
You are right about large democrat precincts where democrats control all access to the evidence and refuse to allow republicans access. Republicans have found no evidence of fraud where democrats have been successful in blocking their investigations.
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
AbbeyRhode · F
Sure, that's believable; a machine that's transported all over, and used by the general public, is too delicate to even be looked at. People should be insulted that the Democrats believe they are stupid enough to buy that. At least, those of us who aren't liberals, who actually ARE stupid enough to buy that. 😁
Northwest · M
It's as if you have no clue what's been going on. The Arizona republicans had yet another recount done, they called it an audit, and it actually gave the Democrat more votes. Yet, you continue to repeat the same lies. The only Americans falling for this, are your kind.
Why do you continue regurgitating Faux News and Mar-a-Lardo without doing any fact checking? Pretend you have a working brain.
Why do you continue regurgitating Faux News and Mar-a-Lardo without doing any fact checking? Pretend you have a working brain.
justanothername · 51-55, M
akindheart · 61-69, F
melbeacher · 61-69, M
@akindheart No I completely disagree. His own attorney General Bill Barr said there was no fraud. The FBI said there was no fraud. The Republican governors and state attorney generals and election supervisors all said no fraud. NO ONE has produced any real evidence. All his court cases were thrown out due to NO EVIDENCE. TRUMP LOST.
marke · 70-79, M
@melbeacher
Bill Barr can say what he likes but that does not make him right. Sadly, he has shown that he does not even understand what voting fraud is.
Bill Barr's Bald-Faced Lies About Voter Fraud - LA Progressive
Bill Barr's Bald-Faced Lies About Voter Fraud
"Unfortunately, it speaks volumes to the credibility of Attorney General Barr when he submits half-truths and alternative facts as clear evidence of voter fraud without having so much as even contacted me or the district attorney's office for an understanding of the events that actually occurred."
'That's Not What Happened at All,' Say Prosecutors After Barr Falsely Claims Man Cast 1,700 Fake Ballots in Texas
Attorney General William Barr speaks during a press conference on January 13, 2020 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)
As Attorney General William Barr faced renewed calls for his impeachment after claiming not to know whether it's illegal for a U.S. voter to cast two ballots in a federal election, prosecutors and journalists have caught the nation's top law enforcement officer in a "massive falsehood" about a mail-in ballot fraud case in Texas.
No I completely disagree. His own attorney General Bill Barr said there was no fraud. The FBI said there was no fraud. The Republican governors and state attorney generals and election supervisors all said no fraud. NO ONE has produced any real evidence. All his court cases were thrown out due to NO EVIDENCE. TRUMP LOST.
Bill Barr can say what he likes but that does not make him right. Sadly, he has shown that he does not even understand what voting fraud is.
Bill Barr's Bald-Faced Lies About Voter Fraud - LA Progressive
Bill Barr's Bald-Faced Lies About Voter Fraud
"Unfortunately, it speaks volumes to the credibility of Attorney General Barr when he submits half-truths and alternative facts as clear evidence of voter fraud without having so much as even contacted me or the district attorney's office for an understanding of the events that actually occurred."
'That's Not What Happened at All,' Say Prosecutors After Barr Falsely Claims Man Cast 1,700 Fake Ballots in Texas
Attorney General William Barr speaks during a press conference on January 13, 2020 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)
As Attorney General William Barr faced renewed calls for his impeachment after claiming not to know whether it's illegal for a U.S. voter to cast two ballots in a federal election, prosecutors and journalists have caught the nation's top law enforcement officer in a "massive falsehood" about a mail-in ballot fraud case in Texas.
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
Yeah! And, why are insurrectionists too fragile to submit proof of their conspiracies in the form of legal logic? And, what about that audit in Arizona funded by taxpayers that proved the accuracy of the vote count. And, what about those 3 manual counts in Georgia? And, how do we really know the earth is round?
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@marke And, let's not dismiss those Italian satellites (Satellite Tracking Journal) that sent synchronized signals to non-networked voting machines and literally changed the votes... but only for President. I suppose the signal wasn't strong enough to change the votes on other candidates on the ballot. But, that's besides the point because we literally have the evidence that the votes were changed.
It's time we stop depending on electronics altogether. Am I right?
It's time we stop depending on electronics altogether. Am I right?
marke · 70-79, M
@MarkPaul
And, let's not dismiss those Italian satellites (Satellite Tracking Journal) that sent synchronized signals to non-networked voting machines and literally changed the votes... but only for President. I suppose the signal wasn't strong enough to change the votes on other candidates on the ballot. But, that's besides the point because we literally have the evidence that the votes were changed.
It's time we stop depending on electronics altogether. Am I right?
As long as the democrats have presented themselves as a lawless party opposed to God and American patriotism, Americans will never be able to take their unsupported word that the ballot dumps for democrats are valid and must be accepted without question as legitimate.It's time we stop depending on electronics altogether. Am I right?
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
@marke And, as long as the demon-craps show themselves as against American values like being against insurrection, opposed to beating up cops on duty, and being for decency then we can never trust them. And, don't get me started on how they make a big deal out of people who pay for abortions to erase their own bad behaviour while claiming they are against abortions for everyone else. No one is perfect and the demon-craps trying to turn hypocrites like that into villains is unforgivable. And, don't even get me started on how they have a problem with shooting protesters in the kneecaps or attempting to kidnap a Governor. I mean if you can't kidnap a Governor you are against what are they going to come after next... our guns? Well, that's not going to happen. Not on my mindless watch.
smiler2012 · 61-69
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
melbeacher · 61-69, M
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
ElwoodBlues · M
Hey, let us know when you find even up a SINGLE ONE of the alleged ballots printed by foreign countries!
What's that? After two years, after Cyber Ninjas checking every ballot with a microscope, you guys never found a SINGLE ONE of the alleged ballots printed by foreign countries?? LOL!!!
If the machines were altering the count like Trump claimed, how come the hand count matched the machine count so closely???
If the machines were altering the count like Trump claimed, how come the hand count matched the machine count so closely???
In all, there were 126 counties within 10 votes of their original vote tally, according to the audit data. Of those counties, 54 counties matched their initial results exactly. No county had an error rate higher than 0.73% compared to their original results.
https://www.ajc.com/politics/breaking-georgia-manual-recount-confirms-biden-victory/B7LNNHYZOVGKZBUVAT7NZT3VZE/
ElwoodBlues · M
@marke So no ballots printed by foreign countries then. Trump was DEAD WRONG about this, LOL!!!
And the security procedures are detecting duplicate ballots and removing from the count. Thanks for pointing this out!
There is no indication the double-counted ballots influenced the final total votes for either former President Donald Trump or President Joe Biden.
And the security procedures are detecting duplicate ballots and removing from the count. Thanks for pointing this out!
There is no indication the double-counted ballots influenced the final total votes for either former President Donald Trump or President Joe Biden.
marke · 70-79, M
@ElwoodBlues
There is no indication these leftist investigators could find a duplicate ballot in a room full of duplicate ballots.
There is no indication the double-counted ballots influenced the final total votes for either former President Donald Trump or President Joe Biden.
There is no indication these leftist investigators could find a duplicate ballot in a room full of duplicate ballots.
ElwoodBlues · M
@marke An opinion piece lacking factual evidentiary support
BTW, Thanks for coining that phrase - it really comes in handy for responding to your evidence-free opinions that you try to slide in.
BTW, Thanks for coining that phrase - it really comes in handy for responding to your evidence-free opinions that you try to slide in.
justanothername · 51-55, M
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
independentone · M
And just who will "inspect" these voting machines, those yahoos with neck beards from meal team 6, dressed in their tactical gear?
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Certainly not you fool. @independentone
independentone · M
@jackjjackson Aren't you the one who claimed, with the poor writing skills, that you stuffed your wife in a ballot box?
No one takes you serious jjackson or budwick or whatever account you are currently using
No one takes you serious jjackson or budwick or whatever account you are currently using
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Correct. You’re a nobody. @independentone
FreestyleArt · 36-40, M
marke · 70-79, M
@FreestyleArt
Since voting machines are widely used in national elections it should be against the law for democrats to totally control them from pre-programming through managing them during the election and refusing to allow them to be investigated after the election.
We should never have these damn Machines in the first place
Since voting machines are widely used in national elections it should be against the law for democrats to totally control them from pre-programming through managing them during the election and refusing to allow them to be investigated after the election.
Ryannnnnn · 31-35, M
I wouldn't get "news" from here my dude haha. Front page is kissing elon musks ass, calling a protester a crack pot whilst also being about freedom apparently (the crackpots are the people not concerned about the imminent death of the human race), I saw a hyperlink to "americangulag" 😅
Maybe use it for talking points but do some research elsewhere..it's not good.
Maybe use it for talking points but do some research elsewhere..it's not good.
Zonuss · 46-50, M
Fake news 🗞️
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment