We already know the results of the upcoming election

@badminton is that where the Reptilians come in?
I'm still not clear if they're Democrats or just working together with them.

@badminton
No, democrats will have to find something. THEY are the ones that need re-branding.

@robingoodfellow Hillary Clinton is allied with the Reptilians; George Soros is allied with the Greys.
Hillary seeks to become the evil Empress of Earth. From her secret mountain fortress she is training her army of Reptilian Hybrid super soldiers to take over America.

George Soros is using the Grey's technology by directing mind-control rays at all right-thinking conservative American men. The only defense again the Greys/Soros mind rays is to wear a foil hat. You have to wear it all the time; at work, in the grocery store, to church, everywhere. Don't Tred on me you commie aliens!

@Thinkerbell @LeopoldBloom Actually the Clinton campaign had the ultimate expression in "ratfucking" in the Pied Piper campaign detailed in this article by the Atlantic.

https://www.salon.com/2016/11/09/the-hillary-clinton-campaign-intentionally-created-donald-trump-with-its-pied-piper-strategy/

Essentially, Clinton's campaign conspired with several media outlets to promote Trump's rhetoric and give him extra attention and air time. The goal was to then use Trump's words against the eventually Republican
nominee.

Additionally, if you read the article you will see they conspired against Sanders as well, even though at that point Clinton hadn't secured the nomination and it should have been kept open and fair for both candidates.

Obviously this backfired spectacularly and was only exposed by Wikileaks after the 2016 election.

I have a hard time believing this is the first you would have heard of this, bloom.

@SumKindaMunster That theory was out in the open even before Clinton was nominated. The phenomenon of "Bernie bros" who voted for Trump may have had an effect; the only question is how large it was. While I supported Sanders at the time, he wasn't a Democrat, and only joined the party at the last minute because he had even less of a chance to win as an independent. So of course the party apparatus favored the candidate who had been a member for decades. Anything else would have been unfair. Even if the superdelegate votes had reflected the overall percentages, Clinton still would have won. Sanders never had enough support, he just had enthusiastic support. Kind of like how the Grateful Dead was never a popular band, but what fans they had were really dedicated.

I already said that the promotion of Trump was an attempt at ratfucking that backfired. However, Trump had a substantial lead in the polls from the moment he declared. He would have been the nominee even without Democratic or media involvement. The race was basically for who would be #2 and presumably pick up Trump's votes when he "inevitably" lost support, which is why none of the other Republicans wanted to attack him, as they didn't want to alienate his supporters. Remember when Trump said Ted Cruz' dad killed JFK and that Cruz' wife was ugly, and Cruz didn't even complain? Even at that point, he thought he could either pick up Trump's voters or that the Republican party apparatus, that clearly didn't want Trump to be the nominee, would figure out a way to give him the nomination.

@LeopoldBloom
It's not a "theory" bloom, it happened. People lost their jobs over it.


Supposing that's true. Did that make it ok that Clinton and the DNC methodically used their resources to spike his campaign? Shouldn't it have been a fair contest to the end, if, as you say, Clinton would have won anyway?


Bullshit Bloom, he struggled to get the nomination. Remember "Never Trump"? They didn't want him as the nominee and I am certain the Pied Piper campaign caused lots of issues for the Republicans...but it blew up in her face too. Reminds me of the saying about how tyrants sow the seeds of their own destruction...😆


Yes, this goes to my point about "Never Trump" and the assumption Trump would not get the nomination.

@MistyCee Except he sid exactly that while campaigning.

[i]Joe Biden: “We Are Going To Get Rid of Fossil Fuels”

@Budwick Did he say when?

@MistyCee I don't believe he did.
But, his actions in office apparently meant right away.

@UnderLockDown How many Dems have claimed fraud?

@smiler2012 You've definitely got the wrong guy. OP isn't a Republican, nor does he think there was any cheating in the last election. If you reread his post, he's saying Republicans will use the LIE that Democrats cheated in order to take back Congress this year.

@smiler2012

You're not even an American. Let it go! Get on with your pathetic life.

@smiler2012 i think you may have read it upside down 🙃

@whowasthatmaskedman
Gosh, was it??? I had no idea. 🙄

No, I don't pretend I know everything, but I keep my mind open and think about what other people say. If I believe there is something to it, I research it on my own.

But that's not what this is about. You've positioned yourself as a wise free thinker, pragmatic and open.

But that's not the experience I had with you. We were talking, you were making some points and I was challenging them...

...then suddenly you pivoted and started pretending you couldn't understand what I was saying, saying I had taken a turn into the "surreal", then you started throwing strawman responses in my face...

...finally you shut down, got real sarcastic, and basically made multiple comments about how I had no power to affect you with my words and insinuating I was deranged or crazy.

I was disappointed both with that, and the childish way you shut down, basically a variation of sticking your fingers in your ears and saying "Nah nah nah"

As I said before, I thought you were better than that....

@SumKindaMunster If this is your attempt to "save the relationship" dont worry about it. If you just realised this was all out there and concerned about your image here, well thats on you. I dont claim to know everything and never have. But I know my subject. You wont find me talking about antiques, the joys of hunting, or even what its like to live in South Dakota. I dont know. But economics is a mix of accounting, politics and housekeeping horse sense I understand. And when you attack me personally on that, have your facts or be prepared. You arent.,😷

@whowasthatmaskedman I honestly don't know what you are talking about, and I no longer care. This is not a relevant response to what I wrote.

I misjudged you and I am sorry for that, as it is clear you are not the person I thought you were.

Be well.

@Ryderbike

@SumKindaMunster you didn’t like my reference to history so you posted what you mistakenly thought would support your argument.

Nothing more complicated than that.

@SatyrService Because he thinks he he's still got a decent shot at winning without it, imo.

In many ways, he's come pretty close to outright rebellion, but his bullshit is sketchy enough that he can't really sell it and his army, i.e., those willing to fight for him is pretty small.

@SatyrService for biden?