This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
I agree except for the name. It’s called fascism.
Trust no one but the FUHRER.
Trust no one but the FUHRER.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@SumKindaMunster First step in a fascist movement is to attack and undermine all the institutions.
Isn’t that what you are doing ?
The press
The courts
Poll watchers
Election officials
Doctors
Hospitals
Scientists
Generals
DOJ
Nato
FBI
CIA
Post office
Teachers
Disney
And the list goes on
You can only TRUST DEAR LEADER
FASCISM 101
Isn’t that what you are doing ?
The press
The courts
Poll watchers
Election officials
Doctors
Hospitals
Scientists
Generals
DOJ
Nato
FBI
CIA
Post office
Teachers
Disney
And the list goes on
You can only TRUST DEAR LEADER
FASCISM 101
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Ryderbike No. I'm calling out and mocking your childish partisan sniping.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Ryderbike "Partisan" does not refer to either the Democrat or Republican party, rather it is a term used to describe those that promote the ideals, world view and propaganda of their preferred political party.
It has nothing to do with citizenship.
It has nothing to do with citizenship.
partisan
noun
An adherent to a party or faction; esp., one who is strongly and passionately devoted to a party or an interest.The commander of a body of detached light troops engaged in making forays and harassing an enemy.Any member of such a corps.
noun
An adherent to a party or faction; esp., one who is strongly and passionately devoted to a party or an interest.The commander of a body of detached light troops engaged in making forays and harassing an enemy.Any member of such a corps.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Ryderbike You mentioned that already, that's why I had to school you on the meaning of "partisan."
Observant huh? 😆 Well I beg to differ.
Observant huh? 😆 Well I beg to differ.
@SumKindaMunster was Europe partisan when Hitler started invading nations?
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
Mike Godwin
@sfmnemonic
·
Follow
By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you.
@sfmnemonic
·
Follow
By all means, compare these shitheads to Nazis. Again and again. I'm with you.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Ryderbike Citing "Godwins Law" in an internet debate does not mean I endorse everything he says as well. 🙄
@SumKindaMunster I think that was a good lesson for you .
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Ryderbike That's what you refer to as a "lesson" huh?
The only thing I learned is what I already knew, you have no nuance, or common sense and are an indoctrinated fool who argues in binary.
The only thing I learned is what I already knew, you have no nuance, or common sense and are an indoctrinated fool who argues in binary.
@SumKindaMunster you posted Godwin’s famous “internet law” in an attempt to demean or diminish my argument.
Instead you learned something.
I would let it go if I were you before you make it worse,
Instead you learned something.
I would let it go if I were you before you make it worse,
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Ryderbike No, rather I was marveling at the fact that he is correct on that particular point and you demonstrated it in your replies.
Ooooh, thanks for the warning, I am so worried. 😂
I would let it go if I were you before you make it worse,
Ooooh, thanks for the warning, I am so worried. 😂
@SumKindaMunster suit your self.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@Ryderbike
https://similarworlds.com/random-subjects/something-say/3649023-How-to-know-if-you-have-won-an-argument-on-the
Third way: Ad hominem or straw man responses. Person responds beside the point, or engages in personal attacks instead of attacks on your argument. You've upset them emotionally and this is the only way they can respond. You win again.
@SumKindaMunster you didn’t like my reference to history so you posted what you mistakenly thought would support your argument.
Nothing more complicated than that.
Nothing more complicated than that.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment