Fun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Biden Plans To Steal The NEXT Election With An Executive Order. No Kidding

Last year Biden issued Executive Order 14019, “Promoting Access to Voting.” It directed every federal agency, agencies that are staffed through partisan appointments, to create a plan to register and mobilize voters. It also orders these agencies to work with organizations such as activist groups to register and mobilize voters in whatever manner they see fit. In doing so, the Biden administration has politicized election processes that were uniquely guarded as nonpartisan since the ratification of the Constitution in 1788.
From Biden's election subversion order:

"especially people of color" (read: discrimination against white people)

"black voters and other voters of color" (read: bias especially for blacks but bias for anyone not white, too)

"disproportionately burdened by voter identification laws" (read: they're black, they shouldn't have to do the same as all other Americans)

"Executive departments and agencies" (read: Biden's cronies he politically appointed to his cabinet) "should partner with State, local, Tribal, and territorial election officials" (read: use federal government power to influence local yokels) "to protect and promote the exercise of the right to vote" (read: promote non-white people ahead of white people), "eliminate discrimination" (read: discriminate against white people), "and other barriers to voting" (read: and whatever else we can come up with), "and expand access to voter registration" (read: get out the Democrat vote).

"Agencies shall consider ways to expand citizens’ opportunities to register to vote and to obtain information about, and participate in, the electoral process." (read: my (Biden) political cronies I've positioned in the federal government should partisanly interfere in the election to get Democrat votes, monitor how its going, and interject Democrat influence in the electoral process).

"directly engage with the public — including through agency materials, websites, online forms, social media platforms, and other points of public access — about how to register to vote, how to request a vote-by-mail ballot, and how to cast a ballot in upcoming elections" (read: My (Biden) political cronies must do everything possible to influence the election, including creating websites, creating online forms, promoting the Democrat agenda on social media — anything short of actually voting for them).

"soliciting and facilitating approved, nonpartisan third-party organizations and State officials to provide voter registration services on agency premises" (read: recruit our pre-paid Democrat army of social organizations to our partisan political facilities to get those Democrat votes).
@specman Yeah and you believe in fucking monkeys.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
@Oster1
He is one handsome, great American, who still could outsmart, all of you losers.
Then why does he pose as a simpleton with advanced dementia when he posts here?
No states constitution puts executive orders above state and federal Law. Joe is the dumbest president of 44 of them.
@Thinkerbell Can you please make that happen?
@Thinkerbell oh puleeeeze make it so! And the other democrats too?
Thinkerbell · 41-45, F
All voters should be required to show a state or federal ID before voting.
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
Shame SCOTUS will rule before then it’s the state legislatures that make election laws..

NAme a single thing bidens done that hasn’t been ruled unconstitutional and over ruled..

China joes gunna commie tho
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@sunsporter1649 Originally, electors were chosen by the state legislatures, but now every state lets the voters do it. So changing it back should require them to change the law, not just decide on the spur of the moment that they don't like the result.

Anyway, the Constitution already says Congress can get involved. If you don't like that, then you need to amend it.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Lila15 The States in question changed their Constitutions, not a law
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@sunsporter1649 OK, so we have nothing to worry about because every state will appoint electors by popular vote. Except the Supreme Court next year will be considering a case where a state can negate the popular vote if it suspects "irregularities," meaning the wrong candidate won.
I just read the president's order. It does exactly what you said it does. Furthermore, in its first section, it orders all of Biden's political appointees leading federal agencies to turn out the non-white vote specifically. It also directs Biden's political cronies in executive federal positions to get those who don't speak English into voting booths.
This message was deleted by its author.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@MarmeeMarch One owes $4,000,000 in back taxes, the other made millions shaking down corporations for millions. Wonderful folks, fit right in with the demonocrat party playbook
This message was deleted by its author.
Biden funneled enormous sums of taxpayer-funding for the federal government into the hands of new and existing Democrat activist organizations by way of those huge spending bills. Biden supporters at the local level now don't need a job since our tax money primarily paid them salaries so they can work for Democrats full-time, now and through the election.
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
@DffrntDrmmr I trust evidence is forthcoming?
beckyromero · 36-40, F
Nah. No need for an EO.

The Vice President can just toss out the Electoral Votes from the big bad Red States and accept substitute electors, right?

Ironic that Trump came up with that idea first, huh?
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@MarmeeMarch

In 1800, Vice President Thomas Jefferson, as President of the Senate, counted the Electoral Votes.

He didn't throw out votes, but he COUNTED the technically flawed Electoral Votes from the State of Georgia in his favor. In otherwords, he decided to count Electoral Votes in his favor that technically he should NOT have.

If Georgia's EVs were note counted, Jefferson and Aaron Burr would have each received 69 Electoral Votes, as well as President Adams. All would have been short of the 70 Electoral Votes needed for a two-man run-off in the House.

In reality, Jefferson and Burr each received 73 and the election was thrown to the House. Jefferson was elected President on the 36th ballot. Burr became Vice President.

But under the rules at the time, had Jefferson NOT awarded himself (and Burr), Georgia's 4 EVs, then there would have been a five-man runoff in the House:

Jefferson (Democratic-Republican) 69
Burr (Democratic-Republican) 69
John Adams (Federalist) 65
Charles Pinckney (Federalist) 64
John Jay (Federalist) 1

(One Federalist elector voted for John Jay so as to allow John Adams a presidential victory over Pinckney had they each received more than 69 EVs).

In a five-man runoff, it is likely that Revoluntionary War hero and South Carolinian Charles Pinckney would have emerged as the compromise candidate acceptable to the Democratic-Republican in order to stop the re-election of John Adams.

Thus if Jefferson did in fact ignore irregularities that should have invalidated the Georgia ballot, the historical consequences are profound. Had that ballot been tossed out, Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, not Thomas Jefferson, might well have become the third President of the United States.
This message was deleted by its author.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@MarmeeMarch

The President of the Senate presides over the counting of the Electoral Votes.

That is usually the sitting Vice President, but not always.

Both Thomas Jefferson and John Adams (four years earlier) declared themselves victors when they presided over the counting of the Electoral Votes.
Martin van Buren, too.

As well as George H. W. Bush.
ItsSteve · 46-50, M
So this seems to have gone off the original topic into silliness, but I think it's probably a good thing for the government to provide information to people about how to register to vote and vote. I don't think it's a bipartisan thing to put out something saying "Here are all the states and their voter registration deadlines. Here's what you have to do in each state to register, etc." It seems like that's pretty much what the EO does, so I don't see it as a problem.
ItsSteve · 46-50, M
@sunsporter1649 i think its more that nobody knows how to vote until they learn. Tell me, why are you opposed to people voting?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@ItsSteve Seems like schools are too bust telling kids boys are really girls rather than basic civics
ItsSteve · 46-50, M
@sunsporter1649 i dont kbow. Its been quite a few years since i was in school, so i dont k ow what they're teaching these days for sure
So what's wrong woth voting, again?
Driver2 · M
Time to clean house
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Pikachu Yup, you were there, heard the whole speech, and went zippy-do-da into a riot, right?
@sunsporter1649

lol i can't believe you think this "but were you theeeere?" is the ace up your sleeve.
Were you there in 1939 at Hitler's Reichstag speech?
No? Oh, so then i guess that had nothing to do with exhorting his people to invade Poland.

Fact:
If you could make a case that what Trump said on that day did not directly precipitate what happened on Jan 6th then you would.
But you can't so you keep backing down. This submissive posture has been noted.

Keep wagging your haunches in there air.😂

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Pikachu Speaking of nazi's, got all 36 of your kung flu shots that will prevent you from getting the kung flu? You left-wing nut-job marxists will believe anything pmsnbc spews.
He’s clutching at straws, his cabal really doesn’t want him to run nor do a number of Democrats. His e.o. I believe violates the hatch act.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@CorvusBlackthorne “Maine and Vermont remain the only states that allow persons in prison to vote (as well as the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico). In July 2020, the Washington, D.C. Council passed an emergency bill that authorized all incarcerated residents with a felony conviction to vote in the November 2020 election. The Council intends to make the change permanent.”
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@sunsporter1649 If they pass a law to that effect, yes.

When was Bill Clinton convicted? The last conviction was Steve Bannon. I know they look kind of similar but they're two different people.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Lila15 (1) On or about December 17, 1997, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly encouraged a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him to execute a sworn affidavit in that proceeding that he knew to be perjurious, false and misleading.

(2) On or about December 17, 1997, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly encouraged a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him to give perjurious, false and misleading testimony if and when called to testify personally in that proceeding.

(3) On or about December 28, 1997, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly engaged in, encouraged, or supported a scheme to conceal evidence that had been subpoenaed in a Federal civil rights action brought against him.

(4) Beginning on or about December 7, 1997, and continuing through and including January 14, 1998, William Jefferson Clinton intensified and succeeded in an effort to secure job assistance to a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him in order to corruptly prevent the truthful testimony of that witness in that proceeding at a time when the truthful testimony of that witness would have been harmful to him.
justanothername · 51-55, M
Picking my popcorn and reading all the dumb responses from concerned Republican voters.
justanothername · 51-55, M
@CorvusBlackthorne my attempt at being witty. I was trying to make fun of them.
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
@justanothername I was being facetious.
justanothername · 51-55, M
Lila15 · 22-25, F
Because Republicans know that if more citizens vote, they’ll lose.
This message was deleted by its author.
Lila15 · 22-25, F
@MarmeeMarch Or they're being purged from the voter rolls because they forgot to dot the "i" in their signature, or the line to vote will take 8 hours and they can't wait that long.

But I agree, way too many people don't even bother to register. I'm disgusted at the lack of participation among people my age. And then they complain about the country being run by old people.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
Electoral college picks president.
Projection AF.
Bill1372 · 51-55, M
Makes sense why Biden has the borders wide open. Biden is legit senile. His own party will certainly turn on him. He had no business being President from day 1
TheRascallyOne · 31-35, M
Sounds about right
Why are republicans afraid of more votes? You would prefer less people voted? Specifically, less minorities.
@MarmeeMarch You think people should be stopped from voting?!
But I thought you were a REAL American.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@BohemianBabe The evidence points to dead people voting, since demonocrats object to any attempt to clean up voter registration rolls
@sunsporter1649
The evidence points to dead people voting, since demonocrats object to any attempt to clean up voter registration rolls

Source?
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
As always, you have no evidence whatsoever for your imbecilic claim.
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
@DffrntDrmmr
Go read Biden's executive order sunsporter1649 refers to, which he provided
With respect, the link to the executive order was actually provided by @MistyCee.

@MasterLee
get off your lazy ass and read the EO.
That was unnecessary.

@sunsporter1649
For generations, Black voters and other voters of color have faced discriminatory policies and other obstacles that disproportionally affect their communities. These voters remain more likely to face long lines at the polls and are disproportionately burdened by voter identification laws and limited opportunities to vote by mail. Limited access to language assistance remains a barrier for many voters. People with disabilities continue to face barriers to voting and are denied legally required accommodations in exercising their fundamental rights and the ability to vote privately and independently. Members of our military serving overseas, as well as other American citizens living abroad, also face challenges to exercising their fundamental right to vote.
At long last, you have said something honest, which leads me to wonder why you stand opposed to an executive order which would allow those persons easier access to voting. I see nothing in the language of this executive order which supports your twisted narrative.
@sunsporter1649 That truth is in there but that is written in a manner to justify Biden's partisanship and mislead readers about the real objective. It would be exhausting to expose the layers of deceit and rationalization those words are chosen for, but a careful reading exposes the precise summary already given.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@CorvusBlackthorne The Biden administration has politicized election processes that were uniquely guarded as nonpartisan since the ratification of the Constitution in 1788, even up to the prohibiting of political bumper stickers on government vehicles and vehicles parked in government garages
This message was deleted by its author.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
@sunsporter1649
@sunsporter1649 That sums it up.

 
Post Comment