Fun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

House Democrats are sitting on security for Supreme Court justices

The safety of Supreme Court justices should be a priority of the U.S. Congress following the arrest of an armed man near Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s home on Wednesday. The Senate recognized the need for increased security protocols in early May.

Sens. John Cornyn (R-TX) and Chris Coons (D-DE) introduced the Supreme Court Police Parity Act of 2022 on May 5, 2022, and it passed with unanimous consent on May 9. The bill extends existing security protocols to the immediate family members of Supreme Court justices.

The House of Representatives has neglected to take any action on the bill. House Democrats bucked their Senate colleagues and came out against the bill.

I guess nancy is to busy chasing parents at school board meetings
Budwick · 70-79, M
This is serious. Democrats are endangering lives with their inaction.
Pelosi and Schumer both need to be knocked up side the head.
The protesters outside Kavanaughs home need to be arrested and prosecuted.

Why do these things need to be said?
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
@Budwick I was unaware that you were opposed to the First Amendment.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@CorvusBlackthorne Federal law express specifically against that. You could look it up, but we all know that is beyond your capacity
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
Since it is illegal to protest outside the residence of a judge or juror, the protestors should be arrested.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@MistyCee watch your back is definitely a threat.
Dude yelled fire in a crowded theater then claimed he never said the word fire.
graphite · 61-69, M
@AthrillatheHunt The mayor of Chicago explicitly made a call to arms against the Supreme Court. And now that call is being answered.
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
@graphite think they’ll set up a January 6 committee to hold that person responsible for others actions ?
I’m joking of course .
It’s an insurrection..

PatKirby · M
@HoraceGreenley

She'll pay bills using...

fanuc2013 · 51-55, F
They'd love to have conservative justices taken out, so they can get Biden to get more liberals on the court!
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
@fanuc2013
[image/video deleted]
Slade · 56-60, M
@fanuc2013 yes they would.

F, I sent you a PM a couple days ago if you haven't seen it.
Remember when Chuck U Schumer issued the threat earlier. They have no problem using Row v Wade as an excuse to deploy their thugs to intimidate and instigate violence. Things are gonna get bad this summer.
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
@BizSuitStacy
[image/video deleted]
Slade · 56-60, M
@Fukfacewillie stop writing checks you can't possibly cash.

Brah
dakotaviper · 56-60, M
If it was one of the Leftist Judges, you can sure bet every Democrat would be demanding more security for them. For the rest of them, they could care less.
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
@dakotaviper Do you ever grow tired of lying?
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@CorvusBlackthorne Then why is that drunk pelosi sitting her fat duff on legislation to protect supreme court justices?
dakotaviper · 56-60, M
@CorvusBlackthorne do you ever grow tired of not using your brain to think instead of following your exalted leaders blindly.
Literally the scene of an attempted assasination just hrs ago..

But new laws should work..or enforcing existing laws.. 🤷‍♂️

Vile dems and their soros brownshirts

HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout This is how civilizations fail
llamaboy · 36-40, M
EVIL never stops taking or destroying.
Mebbe, but why are we just protecting Supreme Court Justices and not lower court judges. Or are we?

I get McConnell's play here, and I get Garlands refusal to put peaceful protesters in leg irons and call Friends of Ruth Domestic terrorists and prosecute them more swiftly without due process then he did with the Proud Boys or other anarchistic white wing groups that have a longer and more probable history of collaboration with criminal organizations like the Trump Organization, but honestly, I think she's got bigger fish to fry at the moment and since this guy has been nabbed we can give Garland and the "deep state" DOJ at least a day or two before we cry unequal treatment.

Its not like Garland is rushing to prosecute a genuine armed... um.." mostly peaceful protest" aimed at getting the Vice President and Congress to violate their oaths of office or face hanging at the hands of a"mostly peaceful" angry mob taking advantage of the civilized behavior of police trying to do their jobs and protect institutions they themselves want to destroy.
graphite · 61-69, M
Democrats have their big Capitol ruckass variety show tomorrow. First things first.
@graphite Were you in on the planning of this little pre-show thing?

Sorry, but I couldn't resist.
Slade · 56-60, M
Of course they are. They probably sent him
@Slade I've been waiting for that, actually, even though the timing makes zero sense.
Slade · 56-60, M
@MistyCee Really? The opinion has not been released yet. What would be a more opportune time?
@Slade Maybe a week or so ago and not the night before the 1/6 show starts, tbh.
Nancy Pelosi-Can’t Understand Normal Thinking.
2 weeks ago.
dems/rinos: we encourage intimidating justices outside their private residences,
today
Dems/rinos: lets increase security around justices house . our brownshirts are getting out of hand again..
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@SW-User Just like pelosi!
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Schumer probably wants that done so it ( his remarks about reaping a whirlwind won’t come back to haunt him.)
I hope and I’m no fan of AOC that she gets his seat. He lives in fear of her.
[image/video deleted]
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
Mitch sits on everything. Gimme a break.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Fukfacewillie Just like nancy refusing the National Guard on Jan. 6?
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
@sunsporter1649 Never let a non sequitur bother you, it will ruin your charm.
Slade · 56-60, M
@Fukfacewillie especially on your mom's face
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
Why doesn't Brett Kavanaugh just get his own gun? I was under the impression that was what you lot considered security.
dakotaviper · 56-60, M
@CorvusBlackthorne Because the Democrats made Security of Top Tier Government Employees into Permanent Policy after JFK was assassinated.
CorvusBlackthorne · 100+, M
@dakotaviper How dreadful. What a terrible idea. Can't we simply arm them? Or is there a reason you can think of why that might be a bad idea?

 
Post Comment