Top | Newest First | Oldest First
bijouxbroussard · F
But do they have the same rights ? Can they live where they want, work where they want, go to school, marry whom they want ? Or is it a situation of supposedly “separate but equal” ?
View 16 more replies »
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
@SW-User I'd say.....high to certain. If anyone wants to know the truth it's there. If they don't, they won't.
SW-User
@Fukfacewillie It feels like people like this are impervious to facts. Like you show them contradictory evidence of their beliefs and they act like they never saw it. It's so fucking weird. Like, don't people want to believe things that are true?
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
@SW-User Yeah, there are many studies about how people don't actually change their minds when confronted with facts. The vaccine is another example. There's studies about non-confrontation/Socratic methods. Here, it's just bashing over the head.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
o I'm a bit clueless
Yup. That part makes sense
Palestinians in the Gaza strip and the West Bank can't vote. 'Palestinians in Israel proper' can vote but are still legally second-class citizens and treated like shit by the authorities.
MickRogers · 26-30, M
@Burnley123 Is taking one line literally-out-of-context in order to respond?
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@MickRogers I'm literally responding to what you said. Maybe read up on this.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
I bet most people don't know that South African Apartheid was based on the North American 'Indian Reservation' idea. It was modeled directly on Canada's system. A system that is still in existence.
MickRogers · 26-30, M
@hippyjoe1955 The British, French, Spanish, and the US were shoving natives off their land long before Canada ever did.
The trail of tears existed before Canada's reservation idea, anyway.
The trail of tears existed before Canada's reservation idea, anyway.
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
SW-User
@hippyjoe1955
You say this as if people are happy about how native people from North America have been treated. wtf
I bet most people don't know that South African Apartheid was based on the North American 'Indian Reservation' idea. It was modeled directly on Canada's system. A system that is still in existence.
You say this as if people are happy about how native people from North America have been treated. wtf
Heartlander · 80-89, M
Surrounded by countries that arrest, imprison and sometimes even try to execute anyone who publicly professes Judaism or Christianity, I have no problem with the way Israel manages its non-Jewish population.
SW-User
@Heartlander Why are you using Middle Eastern Countries as a standard for ethics? Do you think they really have government figured out?
Elevatorpitches · F
They still suffer massive discrimination right their in their OWN country
These days the homes in Jerusalem are being INVADED by Israelis SAME as before the American revolution British soldiers were SEQUESTERING themselves in colony homes as if they had the right to be anywhere even in some strangers BEDROOM cause they got an attitude about ownership...
u can't imagine the outrage unless u really read these reports and they are not lying. AND NO ONE HERE WOULD PUT UP WITH THIS ever.
People would get shot.
But the repression there is really like that. Its true. It is aparteid. People are also losing their homes in Israel right and left. And thats to say nothing of whats going on in Palestine proper.
Genocide is the word. Sorry if I'm being very STARK. Its a very sheltered world in America in spite of all the bad stuff nevertheless...going on here.
These days the homes in Jerusalem are being INVADED by Israelis SAME as before the American revolution British soldiers were SEQUESTERING themselves in colony homes as if they had the right to be anywhere even in some strangers BEDROOM cause they got an attitude about ownership...
u can't imagine the outrage unless u really read these reports and they are not lying. AND NO ONE HERE WOULD PUT UP WITH THIS ever.
People would get shot.
But the repression there is really like that. Its true. It is aparteid. People are also losing their homes in Israel right and left. And thats to say nothing of whats going on in Palestine proper.
Genocide is the word. Sorry if I'm being very STARK. Its a very sheltered world in America in spite of all the bad stuff nevertheless...going on here.
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
There are citizens and those in the occupied territories. Further, citizenship doesn't automatically mean equal rights.
SW-User
I agree that this conflict is an apartheid. Not so much with it being a genocide.
SW-User
@Burnley123 Well, things like forced evictions, arbitrary detention, and civilian casualties that hasn't drastically effected the arab population (which is in the millions) over a span of the last few decades doesn't really constitute as a genocide.
An example of a genocide would be the Rwandan genocide where about 491,000 to 800,000 Tutsi civilians were literally hunted down and murdered by Hutu militia, their neighbors, and police almost wiping them out. This lasted in a span of 100 days. This Israeli-Palestine conflict has lasted for what, 70 years now? While any civilian death is a horrible tragedy, the amount of casualties in Gaza or Palestine does not affect overall population size or even begin to threaten its existence, unlike in the example of Rwanda.
I think we should keep using "genocide" for the Rwanda-like things, not for every war being fought today. It's important to distinguish one horrible thing from another far more horrible thing. If we call everything by the worst name, we lose that capability.
An example of a genocide would be the Rwandan genocide where about 491,000 to 800,000 Tutsi civilians were literally hunted down and murdered by Hutu militia, their neighbors, and police almost wiping them out. This lasted in a span of 100 days. This Israeli-Palestine conflict has lasted for what, 70 years now? While any civilian death is a horrible tragedy, the amount of casualties in Gaza or Palestine does not affect overall population size or even begin to threaten its existence, unlike in the example of Rwanda.
I think we should keep using "genocide" for the Rwanda-like things, not for every war being fought today. It's important to distinguish one horrible thing from another far more horrible thing. If we call everything by the worst name, we lose that capability.
MickRogers · 26-30, M
@SW-User It's not though.
Apartheid would be if only ethnic Jews had rights. There are Arabs in their military, so I'm not buying this "Ethnic Arabs are treated like second class citizens."
Maybe Arab Palestinians but not Arab Israelis.
Apartheid would be if only ethnic Jews had rights. There are Arabs in their military, so I'm not buying this "Ethnic Arabs are treated like second class citizens."
Maybe Arab Palestinians but not Arab Israelis.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@MickRogers https://www.vox.com/world/2018/7/31/17623978/israel-jewish-nation-state-law-bill-explained-apartheid-netanyahu-democracy
Maybe take a look at this.
Maybe take a look at this.
Easy with equating Apartheid with genocide.
Defacto and dejure rights and relocation may be steps along the way, of course, but they might just be detours.
Defacto and dejure rights and relocation may be steps along the way, of course, but they might just be detours.
PrincessAwesome · 22-25, F
They're the exception. It's always like that in Apartheid states. Even Nazi Germany made exceptions for certain Jews.
LeopoldBloom · M
It applies to the West Bank. However, since West Bank Arabs are not Israeli citizens, technically it’s not apartheid as they are under military occupation and different standards apply. If Israel annexes the West Bank as Bennett wants to do, then they would be under apartheid unless their situation changes.
Stopmakingsense · 56-60, F
A Jewish state? How could that not result in second and third class citizens?
Stopmakingsense · 56-60, F
@MistyCee modern nations have neither state religions nor official churches.
@Stopmakingsense There seem to be a lot of non modern nations still around.
MickRogers · 26-30, M
@Stopmakingsense Jewish state =/= Judaic state.
Scandinavia isn't a country that's exclusively for ethnic Scandinavians.
Scandinavia isn't a country that's exclusively for ethnic Scandinavians.
ElwoodBlues · M
You are confused. Apartheid does NOT equal genocidal.
Definition at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apartheid_(crime)
More or less, apartheid means inhuman acts committed for the purpose of establishing and maintaining domination by one group of persons over any other group of persons and systematically oppressing them.
In south Africa, the discrimination was racial; in Israel it's religious.
Definition at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apartheid_(crime)
More or less, apartheid means inhuman acts committed for the purpose of establishing and maintaining domination by one group of persons over any other group of persons and systematically oppressing them.
In south Africa, the discrimination was racial; in Israel it's religious.