akindheart · 61-69, F
friendlykinkster · 56-60, M
@akindheart Both parties have a lot to lose. As well as Hollywood and others in entertainment industry. Somebody(organization) that has more power than Trump is calling the shots.
akindheart · 61-69, F
@friendlykinkster yes you are right...mea culpa. i think the CIA is involved too
ViciDraco · 41-45, M
Trump has chickened out on and delayed most of his tariffs. To claim they are working is a bit of a stretch.
Stock market has been at all time highs since Obama was in office, except for that little covid window. But also keep in mind that the stock market is mostly a signal of rich people's feelings and rich people are being given huge tax cuts. So why would they be feeling bad yet?
Trump's authoritarianism and violation of civic rights have been talked about already but nobody on the right cares.
The only reason the Dems are talking about the Epstein files so much is because it's the only thing that Trump seems able to do wrong out of his massive list of failings that people on the right even remotely care about.
It's not that there are no valid criticisms against Trump. It's that the right doesn't give enough of a shit about reality to pay attention to those other criticisms.
Stock market has been at all time highs since Obama was in office, except for that little covid window. But also keep in mind that the stock market is mostly a signal of rich people's feelings and rich people are being given huge tax cuts. So why would they be feeling bad yet?
Trump's authoritarianism and violation of civic rights have been talked about already but nobody on the right cares.
The only reason the Dems are talking about the Epstein files so much is because it's the only thing that Trump seems able to do wrong out of his massive list of failings that people on the right even remotely care about.
It's not that there are no valid criticisms against Trump. It's that the right doesn't give enough of a shit about reality to pay attention to those other criticisms.
View 1 more replies »
Convivial · 26-30, F
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
BizSuitStacy · M
@SunshineGirl You project beautifully.
ElwoodBlues · M
@DogMan I think Biz has that backwards. All my searches say Senate REPUBLICANS blocked the Democrats' resolutions demanding release of the Epstein documents.
Likewise, a week ago in the House,
Sorry, the coverups are all on the R side of the aisle. Oh, wait, I've got it.
July 24 2025 — Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) tried a second time Thursday to pass his Jeffrey Epstein resolution to formally demand the release of documents from the Justice Department. But he was again shot down by Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.).
Likewise, a week ago in the House,
July 22, 2025 — Speaker Mike Johnson said that he would adjourn the House until September to avoid a vote on releasing the Jeffrey Epstein files.
Sorry, the coverups are all on the R side of the aisle. Oh, wait, I've got it.
Mullin called on the department to release “all credible information” ...
You can see the problem. That leaves it up to tRump appointees to decide what is "credible." Sorry, I don't trust them to do that, and you shouldn't either.
ElwoodBlues · M
@Kwek00 Thanks!! I found the relevant details and what was being left out by biz.
Sen. Ruben Gallego (D) twice introduced resolutions to release ALL the Epstein material. After that, Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R) offered a resolution to “all credible information,” thus leaving up to tRump appointees to edit the files before release. Not the same thing at all; please inform biz of what she forgot to mention.
Mullin's stated intention is to give tRump cover!!
Sen. Ruben Gallego (D) twice introduced resolutions to release ALL the Epstein material. After that, Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R) offered a resolution to “all credible information,” thus leaving up to tRump appointees to edit the files before release. Not the same thing at all; please inform biz of what she forgot to mention.
Mullin's stated intention is to give tRump cover!!
“I’m sure this would be handled just like any other thing [the Democrats] have tried to go after like the baseless impeachments. Or the bases—baseless special counsels. Or the unbelievable amount of charges they tried to file against the president,” Mullin said while objecting to Gallego’s resolution. “I’m sure this would be handled the exact same way. What we’re simply wanting to do here, is give [Trump] cover.”
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP
Barrack Obama and the gang get exposed for high treason.. all of a sudden every single person linked to Obama.. and been silent on epstien issues, wants to know about epstien..
Oh snd the complicit media who pushed Obamas Russia lies for 10 years.. are suddenly not interested in Russia collusion they helped push.. now they also want to know about epstien. The BIG story they also ignored for 10 years..
Nothing sus 🤓
Oh snd the complicit media who pushed Obamas Russia lies for 10 years.. are suddenly not interested in Russia collusion they helped push.. now they also want to know about epstien. The BIG story they also ignored for 10 years..
Nothing sus 🤓
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout really, and it isn't the Republican house of reps that refused to even take a bite?
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
ShenaniganFoodie · 36-40, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout 8c = maybe no surf this morning
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
ElwoodBlues · M
ElwoodBlues · M
@DogMan Actually, the President does NOT give orders to the DoJ on specific cases. At least, that's the way the system was designed and worked until tRump took office.
Also, let's not forget the ability of tRumpsters to ignore and deny evidence against tRump. You folks ignored and denied the 34 NYC falsifying business records felony, and the seven slates of false electors, and the find 11,000 votes felony.
If Biden had released anything, you guys would have said what tRump recently indicated -- that tRump's name was planted in them. You're only taking the Epstein files seriously because the tRump campaign made promises.
Also, let's not forget the ability of tRumpsters to ignore and deny evidence against tRump. You folks ignored and denied the 34 NYC falsifying business records felony, and the seven slates of false electors, and the find 11,000 votes felony.
If Biden had released anything, you guys would have said what tRump recently indicated -- that tRump's name was planted in them. You're only taking the Epstein files seriously because the tRump campaign made promises.
DogMan · 61-69, M
@ElwoodBlues Senate Democrats voted down a resolution to release the Epstein files. And an Obama appointed judge blocked the release of Epstein's grand jury testimony.
ElwoodBlues · M
@DogMan says
All my searches say Senate REPUBLICANS blocked the Democrats' resolutions demanding release of the Epstein documents.
Likewise, a week ago in the House,
Sorry, the coverups are all on the R side of the aisle. BTW, Biz has blocked me ever since I ridiculed her on her prediction of "vaccine aids" a few years ago, so Biz can't see this post.
Oh, wait, I've got it.
Senate Democrats voted down a resolution to release the Epstein files.
Are you sure? When was that alleged vote??All my searches say Senate REPUBLICANS blocked the Democrats' resolutions demanding release of the Epstein documents.
July 24 2025 — Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) tried a second time Thursday to pass his Jeffrey Epstein resolution to formally demand the release of documents from the Justice Department. But he was again shot down by Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.).
Likewise, a week ago in the House,
July 22, 2025 — Speaker Mike Johnson said that he would adjourn the House until September to avoid a vote on releasing the Jeffrey Epstein files.
Sorry, the coverups are all on the R side of the aisle. BTW, Biz has blocked me ever since I ridiculed her on her prediction of "vaccine aids" a few years ago, so Biz can't see this post.
Oh, wait, I've got it.
Mullin called on the department to release “all credible information” ...
You can see the problem. That leaves it up to tRump appointees to decide what is "credible." Sorry, I don't trust them to do that. We might get something like this!
BizSuitStacy · M
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
BizSuitStacy · M
@ViciDraco I didn't say the Epstein thing isn't bipartisan. I'm saying Trump's not involved.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment