Same with the BBC. Refusal to call Hamas terrorists. They called them "extremists." Absolutely shameful.

The NY Times has a long history of knowingly false reporting, the most egregious of which occurred when their Moscow Bureau Chief, Walter Duranty (who was pro-Soviet and who loved being wined and dined by Soviet bigwigs), told his readers that the Holodomor wasn't happening, there were no food shortages, no mass starvation deaths in Ukraine, etc. He got a Pulitzer for his efforts, and the Times, while much later admitting Duranty's reporting was a pack of lies, never saw fit to repudiate his Pulitzer.

They are beneath contempt.

Absolutely! The propaganda media knows exactly what they're doing, with carefully edited half-truths and outright lies, intended to push a specific agenda. They need to be held accountable for the damaging, and often deadly, consequences of their actions.

Should Rashida Tlaib be censured? Talk about fake news and inciting a riot. How TAF does someone like that get elected in the U.S. ??

Washington Compost said hostages kidnapped by Hamas were "detained." Democrats' media supports the terrorists. (Both the Compost and NY Slimes were awarded Pulitzer prizes for "Trump-Russia collusion" that never happened. Oops!)

The BBC did this too.

I read that there is proof that Israel didn't bomb the hospital.

We're in the 21st century now.
Who reads, or cares about newspapers anymore anyway?

I'm sure the NYT is the go to news source in all the world capitals that saw demonstrations. Not.

Haaretz reported the same thing.

The NYT printed a correction, a few days ago, as soon as they were able to sift through the conflicting stories.

Knowingly false? More like you 100% knowingly making it up.

😲

Pretty funny when Musk uses X to trash the NY Slimes.

Time for a VERY lengthy boycott!!!!!!!

Yes

Or maybe Israel and Hamas started the unrest. Not the New York Times. Also it's kind of disingenuous because conservatives are always in a state of unrest.