This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultRandom
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Head of fallen officers org calls for using domestic terror laws to prosecute inciters of anti-cop violence

The head of an organization supporting families of police officers killed in the line of duty called on prosecutors to use domestic terrorism laws to go after those who cause violence against police officers.

At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday that focused on protecting law enforcement officials, National Fallen Officer Foundation president Sgt. Demetrick "Tre" Pennie spoke out against attacks on police officers, stating that existing laws should be used to charge those responsible with serious crimes.

"I think we need to start holding individuals accountable, which we have not done a great job of -- prosecuting radical groups and people that incite violence against police officers using what we have on the books already, domestic terrorism policy," Pennie said.

Pennie referred specifically to 18 U.S.C. § 2331.

"The DOJ tells us that individuals that use force and intimidation for the purposes of changing governmental policy or acting in line with domestic terrorism. OK, so why don't we have penalties for those individuals that do that?"

Pennie's main point was that "we cannot under any circumstance allow attacks on our police officers," Pennie said.

According to FBI statistics for 2019, black/African-American men are alleged offenders of felonious killings of police officers at a disproportionately high rate. 25% of the alleged offenders were under judicial supervision at the time of the incidents. 75% of the alleged offenders had prior criminal arrests.
wildbill83 · 41-45, M
"The DOJ tells us that individuals that use force and intimidation for the purposes of changing governmental policy or acting in line with domestic terrorism.

Sounds good to me, by that definition, every democrat in congress is a domestic terrorist for undermining the Constitution and defying the Supreme Court
Foreverconfused · 56-60, F
That is dual standard. I personally have known (for 26 ) years about the most deprived, disgusting, human behavior in a police officer that should never have been in the system!!! Yet try as much as they did, victim after victim, it was nearly IMPOSSIBLE to remove from his position. Criminal behavior is an addiction. So the people behind this protection have absolutely NO regard for human life. They are simply trying to get away with criminal acts to support the criminal system of those criminals in power. Do not believe this! There are too many police repeatedly committing crimes against human life. It’s not about race! Sadly to says it’s black offenders just gives an officer a free ticket …. (Hey it’s just blacks!) THOSE officers need to be held responsible and then you WONT have a problem. You think officer bullying innocents will work forever? Since when does ANY society allow that forever? Even criminals behave better than SOME officers. If the system can’t take care of itself, of course society will. The uniform is a cloak for crime NOT FOR all. Of course criminals don’t want to get caught!!!! This is a critical time! For everyone! Do something good!
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Foreverconfused And this officers name is....
Foreverconfused · 56-60, F
@sunsporter1649 after 18 years, enough evidence was stacked up. He quit because he was forced to leave. Then He got arrested for the next offense …. At his next job. This time the department did not have to cover up so he lost. I don’t even want to tell you his job so as not to scare you. Ughhh. And of course not his name.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Foreverconfused So you made it up, eh? Who does your writing, Professor Irwin Corey?
Budwick · 70-79, M
GerOttman · 61-69, M
His heart may be in the right place, but he's trying to stretch a law beyond it's natural reach. It would be a wasted effort when all said and done.
@GerOttman Perhaps. It should be applied to those whose acts can be linked to actual crimes, though.
KiwiDan · 31-35, M
Some Americans really wants to just be full fascist instead of quasi-fascist, it seems
ViciDraco · 36-40, M
So are all protesters deemed guilty of terrorism if a few bad actors hurt a cop at a protest against police? If so, that is mask off authoritarianism.

As public servants, scrutiny and criticism of police is necessary. And when the police are becoming a danger to the communities they serve, which they have been, then protests are not only valid but constitutionally protected.

Protesters that do harm police should be charged. If protesters start breaking into police stations anyone who illegally enters should be charged.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@ViciDraco So your solution is....
@ViciDraco Your concern is reasonable. He does intend to include those not directly involved in shootings, including those that "incite" the violence, as you say. That could, in the wrong hands, be abused by government and requires careful judgment.

With this particular federal administration I doubt that will be an actual concern because they themselves (Biden and Garland) are aligned with the 'police are racist' narrative. (I am not and my own investigation leads me conclude otherwise, that police are verifiably not killing people because of their race).
This message was deleted by its author.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment