This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultRandom
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Head of fallen officers org calls for using domestic terror laws to prosecute inciters of anti-cop violence

The head of an organization supporting families of police officers killed in the line of duty called on prosecutors to use domestic terrorism laws to go after those who cause violence against police officers.

At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Tuesday that focused on protecting law enforcement officials, National Fallen Officer Foundation president Sgt. Demetrick "Tre" Pennie spoke out against attacks on police officers, stating that existing laws should be used to charge those responsible with serious crimes.

"I think we need to start holding individuals accountable, which we have not done a great job of -- prosecuting radical groups and people that incite violence against police officers using what we have on the books already, domestic terrorism policy," Pennie said.

Pennie referred specifically to 18 U.S.C. § 2331.

"The DOJ tells us that individuals that use force and intimidation for the purposes of changing governmental policy or acting in line with domestic terrorism. OK, so why don't we have penalties for those individuals that do that?"

Pennie's main point was that "we cannot under any circumstance allow attacks on our police officers," Pennie said.

According to FBI statistics for 2019, black/African-American men are alleged offenders of felonious killings of police officers at a disproportionately high rate. 25% of the alleged offenders were under judicial supervision at the time of the incidents. 75% of the alleged offenders had prior criminal arrests.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ViciDraco · 41-45, M
So are all protesters deemed guilty of terrorism if a few bad actors hurt a cop at a protest against police? If so, that is mask off authoritarianism.

As public servants, scrutiny and criticism of police is necessary. And when the police are becoming a danger to the communities they serve, which they have been, then protests are not only valid but constitutionally protected.

Protesters that do harm police should be charged. If protesters start breaking into police stations anyone who illegally enters should be charged.
@ViciDraco The organization's president, of the National Fallen Officer Foundation, is directing his attention towards those who promote violence against police officers, not protestors against police. Shooting police officers certainly is not a valid form of protest.
ViciDraco · 41-45, M
@DffrntDrmmr the way they use 'incite' lends me to believe they intend to target a broader audience than people committing the acts. The murder of police officers is tragic, but we cannot actually trust the police to have the best interests of the public in mind given the current environment.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@ViciDraco So your solution is....
@ViciDraco Your concern is reasonable. He does intend to include those not directly involved in shootings, including those that "incite" the violence, as you say. That could, in the wrong hands, be abused by government and requires careful judgment.

With this particular federal administration I doubt that will be an actual concern because they themselves (Biden and Garland) are aligned with the 'police are racist' narrative. (I am not and my own investigation leads me conclude otherwise, that police are verifiably not killing people because of their race).
This message was deleted by its author.