Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

A 22 year old guy with a concealed carry license

Poll - Total Votes: 55
Hero
Vigilante who should have called the Police.
Something else, please explain.
Show Results
You can only vote on one answer.
Shot and killed a potential mass murderer.
Some on the anti gun side are calling him a vigilante.
What do you call him?


https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/07/17/us/indiana-greenwood-park-mall-shooting/index.html
DownTheStreet · 56-60, M
A good shot.
And a law abiding citizen.
Lilred2289 · 31-35, F
I work in a restaurant and if some crazy person came in and started doing that I’d hope and pray someone like that hero was in my dining room!
@Fullmetal He is really a bag of sht.

He is creating a country with communist threads running though it and so many can't see it.
Some of us, we sense that sht is afoot.
Very serious sht, but that's globally too, but we sometimes take the cake, it's so disgusting and a shame, what Canada has become.
I still love my country but I despize the politicians running it, and where they are steering it.

The pandemic or 'plandemic', it was the straw.
SW-User
@LunadelobosIAMTHEDRAGON I love mine, served mine for 4 years. I despise the politicians and corrupt bureaucratic dickheads and powerful crime families who run it and we can't do anything more than voting them out because no one really WANTS to go to prison
@SW-User I have a large extended family who live in Israel: One will ALWAYS see firearms openly carried basically 24/7, because there are very many Israelis who are enlisted at all times in the Army.
In Israel, the are are no mass shootings.
It is a very different mentality.

This is my post on here, which discusses that mentality:

https://similarworlds.com/6069664-I-Believe-In-Responsible-Gun-Ownership/1943947-So-let-me-post-for-you-a-quote-not-from-an
carpediem · 61-69, M
100% hero. It's now coming out calling the cops in Uvalde didn't work out. I'm glad he was there and had the balls to jump into action. I just hope the left doesn't harass the guy.
Punxi · 26-30, F
Hero for sure.
Whyme · 46-50, M
@Punxi im leary of the potential work remember that kid few years back that was shot for wearing a hoody cause he looked potentially bad
Punxi · 26-30, F
@Whyme Trevon Martin. Some who carry guns have bad intentions. Some don't. Not talkin bout arming everyone. Just hope that the score card is balanced and that the good side wins.
Krysclear · 31-35, F
A hero for doing what he didn’t have to do and putting his life in harm to save others
Ozuye502 · 36-40, M
Well I wouldn’t exactly say hero but I’d buy him a beer! Definitely not a vigilante acting in defense of your life or others is not being a vigilante in anyway
Virgo79 · 61-69, M
He deserves a citizenship award.
Whyme · 46-50, M
Need more info really a potential mass shooter ? Everyone driving a car is a potential vehicular killer arent they ya cant just kill em all
ninalanyon · 61-69, T
@Whyme Don't you have a different political system in Canada? Less polarization? I've only visited Canada (Toronto, Burlington, and Niagara Falls) once but the atmosphere was somehow different from the US. Of course it's a small sample so I don't mean it to be taken too seriously. In the US there seems to be a pervasive distrust in government institutions of all kinds, is it the same in Canada?
Whyme · 46-50, M
@ninalanyon not really its the same 2 party liberal or conservative there are other smaller parties but one of them two will be in power and its kinda east vs west east loves liberal west lives off oil so they love conservative east has bigger population so liberal wins till it gets so bad nobody can survive
Montanaman · M
@Whyme 8mm? 🤣
MarineBob · 56-60, M
hero with an attorney .
ChiefJustWalks · 26-30
I shot someone who shot at me once 👌 I wrote the story about it on here. But all in all, I live in an open carry state & a gun license isn't required here.

However, I got my license & took classes anyway in case anything happens. Because to be trained & know how to handle yourself makes a world of difference if you ever truly have to defend your life or anyone else's.
I'd say I'm glad the guy handled himself & protected others. Many people would be too scared to
SW-User
@ChiefJustWalks it also helps to have insurance as a gun owner. The USCCA is the best insurance against anti gun prosecutors, juries and judges we as responsible gun owners can have to keep our asses out of prison for wrongfully being put there because did the right thing by defending ourselves from evil
I'm glad the guy was there and acted, how many might have been killed had this guy not taken action?
Of course,if neither of them had guns no one would have been killed.
@TheSirfurryanimalWales And we get to the issue at the heart of it all. Australia's guns were banned, they are still breathing right, no one is brain dead or living on Mars or what have you?

I mean, LIFE continued right? ....

You know so much more about this, than I.

Australia confiscated 650,000 guns. Murders and suicides plummeted.
In the wake of the killing in Uvalde, here’s what America can learn from Australia’s response to tragedy.

https://www.vox.com/2015/8/27/9212725/australia-buyback
Ozuye502 · 36-40, M
@LunadelobosIAMTHEDRAGON however other violent crimes had a major uptick sounding like criminals fear death more than the cops…
@TheSirfurryanimalWales Well, yeah, but the right to carry and bear "shall not be infringed" unlike other rights.

I'm not saying that Thomas was right and that the Founding Fathers made a conscious decision to enshrine individual liberty over everything else, but he set forth a cogent argument as to why the public welfare was prejudged and shouldn't be questioned, making the right to self defense against aggression preeminent.

I get what you're saying, but I also see what Thomas and his ilk are saying, and I think you're only going halfway.

Dead kids and dead innocent bystanders may be unfortunate side effects, but clearly our founding fathers took away the option of weighing those deaths against disarming those willing to live with them, right?

In case you didn't get it, I agree with where you're going, but I don't think you're going to get anywhere appealing half heartedly to the give me liberty or give me death crowd.

They're too tied up in their willingness to die for their own liberty.
TexChik · F
A good shot !
SW-User
To the people who answered a vigilante and should've called the police...I have two very simple questions for you.
What if it had been you in that situation? Would you rely on the time it takes for the police to respond? Shootings happen within seconds and a lot of life can be taken in that time. By the time police show up, you very well could be one of the dead, all because you wanted a uniform with a badge and gun to do the job that a civilian was willing to do but you would've berated and labeled a vigilante.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Montanaman · M
@MalteseFalconPunch And what exactly is the cause?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
if he saved 1 life he's an American Hero
rfatoday · 61-69, M
Taking a life defensively is never a pleasant thing. But this fellow most likely spared many others from certain death or severe injury. Yet, the anti gun folks got tweaked because he was called a hero. I think they are subconsciously pissed off because people of common sense are correct… a good man (or woman) with a gun can neutralize a bad man with a gun quickly and effectively. Interesting how some mall management rep praised him while at the same time acknowledging he violated policy. Which I assume meant he violated a “gun free zone” policy. Gee, amazing thing… the perp ignored the policy as well. But thanks to the armed good guy he was dropped in his tracks.
SW-User
BlueVeins · 22-25
Who's calling him a vigilante?
ShadowSister · 46-50, F
@FreeSpirit1 Bad optics, to be sure. She does not represent the views of most of us who would like stricter gun regulation.
SW-User
@BlueVeins someone needs to tell her that 500,000 to 2,000,000 defensive uses of a firearm against an attacker each year in this country that does save the good guy and others lives isn't an NRA MYTH. It's a cold hard fact backed up by actual data from the FBI's uniform crime report they release every year.
maybe there would be less shootings if a guy with a gun meaning to do harm has to think if there's a guy with a gun who can stop him
SW-User
@saragoodtimes that's how it goes where I live. Almost everyone is packing. Do we still have our issues? Of course, drugs flooding in will do that. But at least we have a fighting chance being armed ourselves.

If any of you want a master class decades long case study on what REALLY happens when you put leftist gun control in place, just look at cities like Chicago, Detroit, L.A., Houston, St Louis, Minneapolis, etc. You'll find the number of people murdered is disturbing because for some reason or another, criminals by default don't follow gun laws.
ShadowSister · 46-50, F
While I would like to see stricter regulation of guns, it's nice to see a story where someone with a concealed carry license was able to use their gun for its intended purpose.
ShadowSister · 46-50, F
@FreeSpirit1 This is not an issue I am heavily invested in, so I'm not particularly well-versed. I freely confess that I don't have much more than talking points. I typically hear a call for (a) universal background checks, and (b) 3-day waiting periods.

It's not fair that you were denied for giving the answer that it was your right. May I ask what state you are in?
@ShadowSister Massachusetts
ShadowSister · 46-50, F
@FreeSpirit1 Ah that makes sense. It would be a lot different if you were in, say, Texas.
It’s good he was there. For once the good guy with a gun worked. But that doesn’t make up for all the other times when that didn’t help.

You realize if someone else had a gun at that demonstration in Kenosha, Kyle Rittenhouse would be dead?
@FreeSpirit1 Rittenhouse also put himself into a dangerous situation. There was no need for him to bring a rifle to a demonstration. But given his age, the real fault should lie with the cops who didn't take it away from him or ask him to leave. Instead, they thanked him for being there. If a cop had killed two demonstrators and shot a third, it would have been a shitstorm, but since it was a private citizen, the cops basically avoided involvement. Of course, the narrative would have been different if Rittenhouse had been there on the side of the demonstrators and had shot several conservative counter-demonstrators - "violent antifa/BLM lunatic kills peaceful citizens"

Nobody should be allowed to bring a rifle or a handgun to a potentially violent demonstration. If the skateboard guy had managed to kill Rittenhouse, we would have had a very different narrative - "brave citizen kills crazed spree shooter"
@LeopoldBloom If Rittenhouse was there on the side of the rioters they wouldn't have cared if he had a rifle, they attacked him because he wasn't on their side.
@FreeSpirit1 If Rittenhouse had been there to help the demonstrators, the cops would have arrested him.

I still think it's a parallel to abortion. It's OK to kill people who are threatening you, even if you put yourself into that situation.
Whyme · 46-50, M
Mixed emotions it worked out but i dont think arm everyone is the answer
GeniUs · 56-60, M
@Whyme Have you read the story? There's something odd about this (for now) a quick summary:
"A shooting rampage that killed three people and injured two others at an Indiana mall ended after an armed witness shot and killed the assailant, police said."
"In the Greenwood mall shooting, the gunman apparently used a long-gun rifle, Ison said, though law enforcement had not immediately recovered any weapons from the scene."

I'll wait to see how this plays out.
Whyme · 46-50, M
@GeniUs i havent looked into it deeply just skimmed over it either way theres too many dead
PeterJ · 51-55, M
A man doing what a real man does
I'd call him a vigilante without regard to any judgment as to to whether he "should" have called the police or whether he's a hero.

I get that dictionaries define the term differently, but the term generally fits most definitions and I don't see why any non-cop good guy with a gun stopping a crime or shooting someone with a gun can't be called a vigilante.
@FreeSpirit1

See the following definition:


a person who tries in an unofficial way to prevent crime, or to catch and punish someone who has committed a crime, especially because they do not think that official organizations, such as the police, are controlling crime effectively. Vigilantes usually join together to form groups.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/vigilante

By this definition, he seems like a vigilante even if he's doing the right thing.

I don't see why vigilantes can't be heroes, btw.

Now, at the same time, they can be problematic
@carpediem see the definition I just cited. I'm not condemning what this guy did.

I don't generally think it's a good idea for citizens to have to take the law into their own hands, but in this case, I can see it and applaud it.
@TexChik I get it. Vigilantes can save lives and it looks like this guy did.
SW-User
He did right
he hit the anti gun narrative right between the eyes.

must be awfully embarrassing when a good guy with a gun severely keeps the body count low..
Livingwell · 61-69, M
Some people need something to be angry or complain about. He saved lives. Period. And it will affect him the rest of his life. Taking a life is no small thing.
What stops a bad guy with a gun?
A good guy with a gun.
Entwistle · 56-60, M
@AwakeningConfession221122 What stops a good guy with a gun? A bad guy with a gun.
Depends who’s got better aim.@Entwistle
Entwistle · 56-60, M
@AwakeningConfession221122 It may well be the bad guy. They seem to have a good aim when shooting up schools or in Malls.
romell · 51-55, M
In the instant case certainly a hero stopped a carnage however it should not be encourages as in future a good guy could be shot by police instead of the ass..also too.many armed intervention s could result in a bigger carnage
I can say a lot but it's like
he was in the right place at the right time,
so perhaps, a vigilante who got extremely lucky.

I am either a bit on the fence (like in this instance)
and mostly not at all, when it comes to the USA gun laws.
Dshhh · M
I hate that this is often the only way to stop bad action
the police keep showing their true colors.
but that is what happens when you hire bullies to be cops
bullies are always fearful underneath.
Ontheroad · M
I don't know enough of the story to say... I have serious issues with so many carrying firearms, licensed or not, to say what I think without knowing the specifics.
@Ontheroad https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/07/17/us/indiana-greenwood-park-mall-shooting/index.html
Ontheroad · M
@FreeSpirit1 Thanks, after reading the article I have to say his actions in this instance were heroic. He could have walked away but choose to stop the killer.

There still remains for me concerns (based upon my life experiences) about the general public going about armed. However in this instance, his actions were heroic, justified and without collateral damage.
SW-User
He probably stopped more people being killed, a hero in my eyes
nope he did good.. and he helped.. mark
Tres13 · 51-55, M
Lilnonames · F
Need more of those. Cops too scared to shoot

 
Post Comment