Today, Biden said "The Second Amendment is not absolute."

Political grandstanding and nothing more. He’s was in the Senate for 49 years. What did he accomplish? Nothing. His memory is as good as his crackhead son.

it constantly amazes me that . each and every election, ppl are sworn in to uphold the costitution.
and every tragedy. they only solution they can come up with is... dismantling the constitution.
any suggestion of physical barriers is met with silence. and cries that the suggester has no heart and is a gun nut.

the left : we want the guns. or we aint lifting a finger to even try stop school shootings.

Seriously, that's all they've got. Hot air.

To change the Constitution of the United States of America, the following things HAVE to happen:

1. Congress may submit a proposed constitutional amendment to the states, if the proposed amendment language is approved by a two-thirds vote of both houses.
2. Congress must call a convention for proposing amendments upon application of the legislatures of two-thirds of the states (i.e., 34 of 50 states).
3. Amendments proposed by Congress or convention become valid only when ratified by the legislatures of, or conventions in, three-fourths of the states (i.e., 38 of 50 states).

Basically...NOT gonna happen. They don't have the votes. And the legislatures of 38 states would never ratify such a thing.

Um, unless you get an amendment to overrule an amendment, the amendments normally are absolute in USA.

The first problem with banning "assault weapons" is defining what that term means, as I believe one liberal law makers staff recently attempted in the last two years and basically they wanted anything black or camo or something that looked like it could be used in a war/law enforcement movie banned, while having absolutely no issues with guns with the same physical capabilities but didn't look like they would be used in war/law enforcement movies.


Basically they were judging guns as "assault weapons" or not based on how they looked instead of their capabilities.

This was actually Ronald Reagan's stance as well when he publicly supported gun control measures such as background checks and an assault weapons ban

I think there needs to be a measure of checks and balances in order to be able to have a firearm.

Just like you need a license to drive a car. Or you need to be a certain age to drink.

that's funny, considering it actually is absolute... as is the oath many of us swore to defend it against all enemies, foreign and domestic...

wonder how many goons he can find with no fear of death to test his claim? 🤔

[image deleted]

Why did he take an oath to uphold the constitution?

And Tennessee is actually proposing legalizing short barreled rifles and shotguns. Similar to Texas and suppressor laws. Thank goodness for the 10th amendment

American conservatives probably can't accept that.
If Americans want to let them have guns, we can't keep caring about their lives.
No sympathy.

He also said "YOU NEED NUKES IN ORDER TO DESTROY THE GOVERNMENT"


If we acted after he mention it. Who knows it might worked XD

JoeB says a lot of things that have to be re-explained later , for clarification purposes .

But did he get it out in an understandable manner?

😂welp who didn’t see that coming

this also