This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultAsking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Once again I ask: what's the big deal about gender?

Someone just blocked me for pointing out a couple of facts regarding sex and gender (see below).

What I did not get an answer to, before being blocked, is why these facts are so aggravating to people who want to insist that there is only male sex / male gender and female sex / female gender, end of story.

If you and everyone you know are 100% male or 100% female then why would it bother you if other people see life differently? To the point of repeating over and over that such people don't exist or are mentally ill? (The rulers of the Soviet Union also labelled people they disagreed with as mentally ill...)

Sigh...

Fact # 1: Anatomically not everyone is male/XY or female/XX. Here's a rather neutral medical article about some of the many variations that exist: https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/001669.htm

Fact # 2: There isn't a simple one-on-one match between physical sex and psychological or social gender. We don't have to talk about current trends and controversies at all; this goes way back in time in many part of the world. In India,the Hijras have been recognized as a third gender for centuries. Physically, they include intersex people, castrated people, and others. In quite a number of Indigenous North American cultures, going way back, there were people who were seen as neither male nor female, or both at the same time. Often these people had special spiritual roles, which is also the case for the Hijras. Those are just a couple of examples I happen to know something about.
People fear what they don’t understand.
SW-User
@JustGoneNow yes I guess so! Personally I usually find what I don't understand, intriguing...
@SW-User Some people find the unknown terrifying. I try not to judge if at all possible.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@SW-User
You are mixing together different issues here: what is offensive, how identity works, and how gender works.

I don't believe I am, I believe I am demonstrating the hypocrisy and double standards that are being promoted along with transgender rights.

Minority groups get to decide what is offensive to them. That's just basic fairness; otherwise you have a tyranny of the majority.

While I agree with this, I disagree with your earlier point that offense is decided collectively. That's simply not true. People can decide what is offensive individually. You don't personally have to agree on that offense, but you can't determine what an individual finds offensive.

As for identity, that is always an interplay between the individual's sense of self, and being accepted by a community. In the USA you cannot self-identify as Black if you don't have Black ancestry, as Rachel Dolezal found out to her sorrow

Hm, no sorry that is incorrect. People who don't have Black ancestry can and do claim they are black, as others will claim White or Native American heritage. The issue isn't claiming the identity, it's using it to gain special status and privilege in American society. That's what Rachel Dolenzal did. Had she just gone around just claiming she was black, nobody would have cared, but she had gotten scholarships and been elected or appointed to some role within the NAACP and that was the issue that got her sanctioned, not her actual claim of Black identity.

As for gender, again, cisgendered is just a neutral term for "not trans"

It isn't to me, because my only experience with it up to this point is to be labeled that by angry and belligerent trans activists who don't' care for my opinions, my age, my gender identity or my race.

There are trans people; therefore it's reasonable to have a collective term for everyone else.


Well reasonably, there already exists terms for me...man...male...why is the term cis gendered even needed?

The existence of trans people is undeniable; the fact that various cultures throughout history have included people with genders other than male and female is also just a fact

Hey, that's fine. Why does that fact mean I have to have my identity foisted upon me by a small minority of approximately 2% (at best) of the population?

Facts don't get decided by majority vote.

No they don't. But I have noted, again and again that trans activists and their allies desperately want to overlook that.

Your initial question was along the lines as to why people who aren't trans are so unreasonable about this issue:
If you and everyone you know are 100% male or 100% female then why would it bother you if other people see life differently?

I think this conversation is a great demonstration as to why.

I made a very valid, personal and reasonable explanation as to why I don't like to be called "cis gendered". You have argued with me on this point, argued with me that I don't get to chose what is offensive to me or my kind, argued with me about how my personal feelings aren't valid, and have made a massive hypocritical statement by saying that I should accept the label cis-genered because that's what is convenient for trans people, and apparently because they exist, I should just accept all this.

I would think this conversation is a great learning tool as to why there might be a significant difference of opinion, but also why you were blocked.

Who wants to talk to someone who can't even acknowledge basic human requests for how to be referred to or identified as? You seemingly want to argue that because trans people exist, and they need a word that helps them identify in the world, we should all accept that worldview and accept the label they want to apply to us.

Yet, the entire crux of trans people grievances is being forced to use labels that they don't feel properly identify them, they want their own way of identifying....yet they then want to turn around and demand a label for everyone else? And we have to accept that?

This is the reason why you aren't taken seriously.

Because you don't want tolerance. You want validation, you want celebration of your choices, and you want to foist those choices on the rest of us.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@SW-User
If your main point is simply that you don't like to be referred to as cisgendered, that's fine. You don't need to refer to yourself that way, and your friends won't either.

That's part of it, the other part is the rank hypocrisy I see from transgender activists on this where they push their worldview on others, and can't accept that they should give the same level of deference and respect to those that aren't on the gender spectrum as they are. It goes both ways.

Well reasonably, there already exists terms for me...man...male...why is the term cis gendered even needed?
Because those terms include trans men, and there are contexts where the distinction is significant.

Well I don't identify that way, for me, its quite simple, and again I expect my choices honored just like the next person.

It seems like you have had bad experiences with aggressive trans activists. That is disappointing but don't take it out on the rest of us here, who are not aggressive trans activists.

Well I don't think I am, I explained to you the why of my position and that was because of the hypocrisy I see foisted on me, but I am not upset or angered by that.

But I will argue against the hypocrisy I see, and unfortunately, you didn't seem to take me seriously on this until just these last few responses.

Not sure if it was due to my words or position, or that idiot Peckerwood childishly inserting himself into the "discussion", and attempting to hijack it with his nonsense.
SW-User
@SumKindaMunster OK here is an analogy to the position you seem to be taking on the term "cisgendered". I do not like being called "white". It is not something I identify with. If you ask me to describe myself in "racial" terms, I will say "of European descent".

Therefore it would be kind and appropriate for anyone who knows me well to not describe me as "white".

This does not make the term "white" offensive!!
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@SW-User First, interesting...🤔 You don't like being called White...

I understand your position, and don't think the word White is offensive either. I think the nuance you are missing is that a person can take offense to anything and there is nothing you can do about that.

But I understand you feel there is more of a collective, agreed upon way to ascribe what is offensive or not.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
I'll tackle this one.

why these facts are so aggravating to people who want to insist that there is only male sex / male gender and female sex / female gender, end of story.

Not everyone agrees, and acting like there is no valid contradicting point to that is childish and stubborn. Who wants to "debate" someone who isn't even interested in hearing or considering a different viewpoint?

If you and everyone you know are 100% male or 100% female then why would it bother you if other people see life differently?


Speaking for myself, it doesn't at all. However, what I have noted is that transgender activists and their allies insist on promoting their worldview on others. They insist on using the term "cis-gendered" to describe others unlike them. This is just as derogatory, divisive and intolerant as they want to claim anti-transgender propaganda is to them.

It's hypocritical and a double standard. Tolerance goes both ways. If you want respect, give respect.
SW-User
@SumKindaMunster Definitely. You can individually be offended by whatever but that doesn't make it "offensive". Let's say you don't like being called "you"; you prefer "thou". That would not make "you" an offensive term.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@SW-User
You can individually be offended by whatever but that doesn't make it "offensive"

Hm, ok you are kinda contradicting yourself in this statement. So a person can decide individually what offends them, but that doesn't make it offensive to others... fine.

So then why is it ok for transgenders to decide individually how they wish to be identified, even if they have no physical/biological characteristics that confirm their choice? I mean the whole basis of this is they feel misgendered and take offense to being misgendered. They are but a small minority, so based on your logic, shouldn't it then be up to the collective to decide how to refer to that person and even if they should take offense to that label?

Collectively, we should decide what is offensive, but we don't decide collectively what makes up gender? Why are you even promoting the worldview that there are those on the gender spectrum, and everyone else is cis-gendered if we need to decide this collectively?

I wasn't asked and this certainly isn't the worldview I want promoted.

Feels like a double standard and hypocrisy to me.
SW-User
@SumKindaMunster You are mixing together different issues here: what is offensive, how identity works, and how gender works.

Minority groups get to decide what is offensive to them. That's just basic fairness; otherwise you have a tyranny of the majority.

As for identity, that is always an interplay between the individual's sense of self, and being accepted by a community. In the USA you cannot self-identify as Black if you don't have Black ancestry, as Rachel Dolezal found out to her sorrow. But you can self-identify as trans, because that is an identity recognized by other trans people as well as by many people in society at large.

As for gender, again, cisgendered is just a neutral term for "not trans". There are trans people; therefore it's reasonable to have a collective term for everyone else. The existence of trans people is undeniable; the fact that various cultures throughout history have included people with genders other than male and female is also just a fact. Facts don't get decided by majority vote.
BlueVeins · 22-25
lmao I got blocked just for fact #1, conservatives are so damn sensitive about sex.
SW-User
@BlueVeins I understand political conservatism and social conservatism but I don't understand coping with inconvenient facts by repeating again and again that they're just liberal lies!

I'm sorry you got blocked!
SW-User
@BlueVeins That's a generalistic statement. I am conservative but I would never block you over a differing of views regarding sex. I'm not that sensitive. Maybe most conservatives are. I don't know. I haven't seen any data. But regardless, your differing of opinion will not be idly discounted by me or result in you being blocked.
CestManan · 46-50, F
If this is about transgender or peoples' desire to use different pronouns, get this -

Some people out there cannot even respect others' medical decisions with things like abortion or vaccinations, let alone do anything outside gender norms.
As long as you don’t call me anything to do with me being male idc what general pronouns you call me
SW-User
@Mimi9loves2him fortunately English pronouns don't distinguish genders unless you're talking about someone -- and I'm not gossiping about you 😇
@SW-User Ik im just saying that it’s not that big of a deal to some people and some people care alot
SW-User
@Mimi9loves2him very true
pride49 · 31-35, M
Im a dude who likes dudes that's all I know. And I prefer an unconvincing drag queen over a convincing one for some reason. People can do what they want imo. But don't expect me not to stare if I find you look interesting lolz
SW-User
@pride49 I wish were were all just as comfortable as you with who we are and what our attractions are. And you may stare at me if you wish 😏
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
I hate to say it but acceptance hinges on understanding and some people just can't for whatever reason. They blocked you because they can't answer why it's so aggravating for them, it's aggravating because they can't understand, much like how a child may have a temper tantrum.
CestManan · 46-50, F
@SatanBurger People can accept or not but they are going to have to learn to live with it. All the mass shootings, hateful Christians and republicans, and whatever are not going to make it go away.
bookerdana · M
Theres intersex,too..thats Science Gender is a psychological coontinuum
RedBaron · M
Nobody but the person who blocked you can explain why they did so.
SW-User
@RedBaron That's true but this is something many people get worked up about, in similar ways.
scrood · 31-35
Only pussies block people BECAUSE they can't handle the truth it's a "big deal" to have to face the facts which you present - to sum up only the Y CHROMOSOME makes a male
scrood · 31-35
@SW-User Please re-read: There is NO MALE who does NOT have the y chromosome
scrood · 31-35
@SW-User No one is forcing these people to be here yet they think they can just block and ban and censor and shadow ban everyone and make their safe places - it's just creepy and pathetic something out of the Communist totalitarian technocrat playbook
SW-User
@scrood Still a matter of definition!

Aside from trans men, there are intersex bodies like those described here:
https://medlineplus.gov/genetics/condition/46xx-testicular-difference-of-sex-development/
jademonkey19 · 41-45, T
Such elegant logic.
butterflybaby75 · 46-50, F
Unless something goes wrong, a person is either a woman or a man. Pure and simple.

Unless something goes wrong, a man can be attracted to a woman or a man (or both). And same for a woman.
SW-User
@butterflybaby75 "Wrong" according to whom? 🤔
there are 2 genders .
and a whole series of narcisism...
@SW-User rewriting science and history....
no big deal right..

up is now down.
left is now right.
its no big deal..
SW-User
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout Paying attention, is not "rewriting".
SW-User
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout But actually you are helping me understand. You and I both grew up with male and female as a basic simple distinction like left and right or up and down. It's weird to see basic categories like that called into question.

BUT if we think about it -- something can be way up or way down -- or somewhere in between. Something can be way over on the left, way to the right, or somewhere in between or another direction altogether (forward, backward...). So, it actually makes complete sense that 100% male or 100% female are not the only options either.
For the same reason people who think there are only 2 genders get under others' skin (as well as get blocked)
SW-User
@ImperialAerosolKidFromEP What's the reason for that though?
Fukfacewillie · 56-60, M
I think the gender issue is wacko, but I don’t support how Republicans are dealing with it.
SW-User
@Fukfacewillie for once a nuanced position. Thank you for not taking a party line!
iamonfire696 · 41-45, F
I don’t think it’s a big deal but many people do. It’s too bad more people can’t be open.
iamonfire696 · 41-45, F
@CestManan oh wow you were in that town. I hope you are doing okay 💖.
CestManan · 46-50, F
@iamonfire696 Yeah it happened a couple days before I got there, it was all over the news.

Place I live has a 5 1/2 times higher murder rate per capita, granted most of ours involve gangs.
iamonfire696 · 41-45, F
@CestManan That is crazy

 
Post Comment