This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Pikachu Best Comment
This is the same bullshit argument that conservatives use to not teach kids sex ed even though early sex education protects kids from predators and helps them have a healthy relationship with developing sexuality.
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@Pikachu Agreed.
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 46-50, MVIP
Any grown ass adult this keen to discuss any sex with kids needs to be shot!
Let’s flip the script.. it’s ok to take my 6 year old to a titty bar now?
Of course not.. that would be insane..
Yet we got daily tranny shows for kids..
Let’s flip the script.. it’s ok to take my 6 year old to a titty bar now?
Of course not.. that would be insane..
Yet we got daily tranny shows for kids..
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout So you're against sex education I take it? Just tell them to abstain, then when they have underground abortions from no contraceptives because ya know contraceptives are a form of abortions, we can blame it on the left. How's that lol.
It's disgusting that you make trans, gay, lesbian, asexual or other orientations out to be a form of porn. Why is their orientation sexual to you? That's so weird.
it’s ok to take my 6 year old to a titty bar now
It's disgusting that you make trans, gay, lesbian, asexual or other orientations out to be a form of porn. Why is their orientation sexual to you? That's so weird.
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout Daily tranny shows for kids, never heard of it.
SW-User
This post is gay
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@SW-User I hope it's so gay, it makes the anti gays melt.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@SW-User That's all I ask.
SlightlyBelowAverageJoe · 36-40, M
I 100% agree. Let not "teach" kids about sexual orientation at all. Let's teach them the basics.. math, science, history, etc..
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@SlightlyBelowAverageJoe Sex is natural but we teach about sex education. Did you want to take a chance on your kid being able to abstain and maybe a 50/50 chance they'll knock some girl up their own age because they weren't taught about those things?
Ignorance isn't bliss, same thing with sexual identity. Gay kids may wonder if they are different, it's probably a good thing they are taught they are not different. Unless you're a homophobe, then maybe it's bad depending on perception.
Ignorance isn't bliss, same thing with sexual identity. Gay kids may wonder if they are different, it's probably a good thing they are taught they are not different. Unless you're a homophobe, then maybe it's bad depending on perception.
basilfawlty89 · 31-35, M
@SlightlyBelowAverageJoe biology is natural, botany is natural. Should we not teach those?
@SlightlyBelowAverageJoe
Don't you think it would be good for a gay kid to know that being gay is a thing instead of just feeling like a freak when those feelings arise?
Let not "teach" kids about sexual orientation at all.
Don't you think it would be good for a gay kid to know that being gay is a thing instead of just feeling like a freak when those feelings arise?
ronisme1 · 61-69, M
I wish both sides would learn some tolerance. Straights are ok, gays are ok. People who hate are not ok
Gop has no right to ban gays and gays really dont wish to ban straights
Gop has no right to ban gays and gays really dont wish to ban straights
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@ronisme1 Well yes I agree.
ViciDraco · 36-40, M
@ronisme1 I've never actually had anyone take issue with straightness. There have been jokes, yes. But no actual issue. "Straight people being under attack" is one of those things that happens so rarely as to not really be a thing. There are plenty of both sides issues but this isn't really one of them.
Jackaloftheazuresand · 26-30, M
I don't want teachers talking to kids about any of this, I also don't see a necessity for it. And if that were the intention it's not like it's going to do anything but it will curb some of these teachers getting so buddy buddy with students which I see as all win
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@Jackaloftheazuresand There's religiously conservative families who aren't physically abusive but at the same time if you come out you run the risk of being homeless because they believe being gay is a "choice." There are just people who also believe in things like QAnon anti gay conspiracy theories and that if the kid was to come out gay, they'd freak out but may not physically harm their child otherwise. There's also just low IQ parents and also, parents who had their children young and whose brains stopped growing at a certain age so physically they may be 40 but mentally they could be 16.
I agree with you that "coming out won't stop abuse," that it didn't do you any good to come out and keeping it secret probably protected you. I do think it's wrong of your father to treat you that way which is my opinion but I also believe that just because being closeted hasn't hurt you because you are that way doesn't mean everyone else is. There would be no such thing as internalized homophobia if it didn't hurt someone along the way.
It's like the age old example of an anti gay politician who makes laws to oppress gay people but then is caught hiring gay hookers or even worse, killed one of them. One half of them is anti gay and the other half is gay, this creates sort of a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde experience. This is an over exaggerated but true example of internalized homophobia but other kids can develop trauma that doesn't come out as healthy from not being allowed to ask questions or know who they are.
If we as adults are supposed to protect children from trauma, why would we make laws that further trauma then? Even if it doesn't stop abuse from home, you should still be allowed to explore who you are as a person because one day, you won't have your family and then what's left with the feelings of shame or guilt? Teachers should be allowed to talk to children who are questioning because of it, even if it is a minority.
With that said, there's multiple issues with the GOP doing what they're doing but the main issue is that the GOP's attitudes towards sexual orientation doesn't just stop with making laws against questioning children. This same attitude is found in countries like Poland where there's "no-gay zones" and where gay travelers had to make an underground map of safe areas to stroll through in Poland.
The first step of any oppression is to force people into nonexistence, the overall attitude is what I don't like because I see parallels with other countries. There's so many similarities, countries like Poland and America even have the same vocabulary and that's concerning.
I agree with you that "coming out won't stop abuse," that it didn't do you any good to come out and keeping it secret probably protected you. I do think it's wrong of your father to treat you that way which is my opinion but I also believe that just because being closeted hasn't hurt you because you are that way doesn't mean everyone else is. There would be no such thing as internalized homophobia if it didn't hurt someone along the way.
It's like the age old example of an anti gay politician who makes laws to oppress gay people but then is caught hiring gay hookers or even worse, killed one of them. One half of them is anti gay and the other half is gay, this creates sort of a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde experience. This is an over exaggerated but true example of internalized homophobia but other kids can develop trauma that doesn't come out as healthy from not being allowed to ask questions or know who they are.
If we as adults are supposed to protect children from trauma, why would we make laws that further trauma then? Even if it doesn't stop abuse from home, you should still be allowed to explore who you are as a person because one day, you won't have your family and then what's left with the feelings of shame or guilt? Teachers should be allowed to talk to children who are questioning because of it, even if it is a minority.
With that said, there's multiple issues with the GOP doing what they're doing but the main issue is that the GOP's attitudes towards sexual orientation doesn't just stop with making laws against questioning children. This same attitude is found in countries like Poland where there's "no-gay zones" and where gay travelers had to make an underground map of safe areas to stroll through in Poland.
The first step of any oppression is to force people into nonexistence, the overall attitude is what I don't like because I see parallels with other countries. There's so many similarities, countries like Poland and America even have the same vocabulary and that's concerning.
Jackaloftheazuresand · 26-30, M
@SatanBurger Verbal and emotional abuse may be discussed as well.
I'd say at that point the ball will be in the victim's court. I'm no stranger to the self loathing but it's up to themselves what they do with it. When we protect children we protect them from the influence of others. Feeling isolated because there is no authority on an identity is a self inflicted trauma and frankly, I'm not convinced such a child can even exist. In that way it's not a trauma that can be fixed from the outside There's so many negative influences that I think entirely accounts for any internalized hatred anyway. It wasn't the void that made them that way, it was the jerks who were also speaking where they should be silent. I want something to be done to combat that and not by taking up the opposing weapons to balance it out, because there is a tendency to overcorrect. Maybe this is what my parents did to get me, nobody should be talking to children about their sexuality. And I know those parents and guardians and whatever else will continue being that shouting cruel voice but I think we already have the best solution we are going to get on that and that goes back to the teacher's ability to still be someone the child can come to from a neutral approach and who the child can tell how they are being mistreated.
A lot of things will be a bridge too far. I won't let it go beyond that be assured.
I'd say at that point the ball will be in the victim's court. I'm no stranger to the self loathing but it's up to themselves what they do with it. When we protect children we protect them from the influence of others. Feeling isolated because there is no authority on an identity is a self inflicted trauma and frankly, I'm not convinced such a child can even exist. In that way it's not a trauma that can be fixed from the outside There's so many negative influences that I think entirely accounts for any internalized hatred anyway. It wasn't the void that made them that way, it was the jerks who were also speaking where they should be silent. I want something to be done to combat that and not by taking up the opposing weapons to balance it out, because there is a tendency to overcorrect. Maybe this is what my parents did to get me, nobody should be talking to children about their sexuality. And I know those parents and guardians and whatever else will continue being that shouting cruel voice but I think we already have the best solution we are going to get on that and that goes back to the teacher's ability to still be someone the child can come to from a neutral approach and who the child can tell how they are being mistreated.
A lot of things will be a bridge too far. I won't let it go beyond that be assured.
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@Jackaloftheazuresand I agree with a lot of things you say but I just think sexuality is apart of growing up. The gop is acting like this is being taught all the time or it's like some brainwashing and that's part of the problem, it isn't. They just want to erase and act like it doesn't happen which is similar to gaslighting or stonewalling.
Lol
Looks like at least 3 of the people who responded have blocked me. It seems like they're all against teaching kids about the real world.
Fancy that.
Looks like at least 3 of the people who responded have blocked me. It seems like they're all against teaching kids about the real world.
Fancy that.
ViciDraco · 36-40, M
They won't stop there if they get it. They'll keep walking civil rights back as far as they possibly can. Erasure is only the first step.
SatanBurger · 36-40, FVIP
@ViciDraco I wouldn't doubt it, they already proved it with removing Rosa Parks from school libraries, I guess they got a problem with black people riding in front of the bus and writing about it. They called it "critical race theory" but I don't doubt they'll do something like that next and using some thinly veiled racist excuse as to why.