saragoodtimes · F
Miram · 31-35, F
I find it interesting how unbelievable it is for many that someone in a position of authority can abuse it and can commit murder.
From the comments it is beyond clear they don't even bother to check evidence in question. They instantly reacte with denial.
This happens often when people build their entire personalities , sense of accomplishment and world perceptions purely on their political preferences. It is fear based. If you question the political decision, you question everything else.
Very fuzzy way to identify.
From the comments it is beyond clear they don't even bother to check evidence in question. They instantly reacte with denial.
This happens often when people build their entire personalities , sense of accomplishment and world perceptions purely on their political preferences. It is fear based. If you question the political decision, you question everything else.
Very fuzzy way to identify.
Adrift · 61-69, F
I have this one rule that has gotten me this far in life.
First line of defense, dont put yourself in the situation if it can be avoided.
Especially if you have kids you would like to be going home too.
I don't go to protests and put myself in situations where the shit is likely to be hitting the fan.
The whole mess could have been avoided.
First line of defense, dont put yourself in the situation if it can be avoided.
Especially if you have kids you would like to be going home too.
I don't go to protests and put myself in situations where the shit is likely to be hitting the fan.
The whole mess could have been avoided.
HoeBag · 51-55, F
@Adrift Yeah cause if we are injured or arrested protesting over something we have no control over, no good can come out of it. The ones that get arrested, are the other protesters going to bail them out? Not likely.
First line of defense, don't put yourself in the situation if it can be avoided.
The best defense is to not offend.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Thrust · 56-60, M
Time for the Insurrection Act
Kurt Schlichter @KurtSchlichter
A DEEP DIVE -- Thoughts From a Competent Lawyer on the Minneapolis ICE Shooting:
1. The left is positively turgid about this INCIDENT. They wanted a shooting and did everything they could to set the conditions that made it inevitable, from the rhetoric of the Democrat politicians to the provocations on the street. One leftist white lady dead is a small price to pay for the martyr they wanted.
2. Note that yesterday (1/6/26), the Democrats changed from "The feds are the Gestapo" to "A zillion federal officers died defending Our Democracy, and we support these heroes- here's a plaque!" back to "The feds are the Gestapo" the very next day.
3. The law is clear -- you can use deadly force against someone threatening you with deadly force. The ICE agent had no duty to retreat. This does not matter to the left and its narrative. You will see many experts with zero actual knowledge of the law opining -- including the typically terrible cadre of leftist lawyers.
4. The video is clear that the driver was heading at and came in contact with the ICE agent. He had a right to use deadly force to defend himself. This does not matter to the left and its narrative. The left will do everything it can to keep people from looking at the actual video that shows the incident. It will push video that does not show the incident clearly, as well a perjured or irrelevant witness statements.
5. The leftist narrative will be "Trump's ICE nazis are literally murdering innocent people." This will work on Democrats and Republican sissies. Normal people will ask why she did not comply with the officers' orders and why she drove at a cop. Properly addressed, we can leverage the gross irresponsibility of the Dem pols and communist foot soldiers to defeat their bogus narrative.
6. The corrupt state of Minnesota will "investigate" even though its senior officials have already announced that this was murder, and the ICE agent will be indicted in state court. The feds will remove it to federal court, where the case will fail.
7. There will be a civil suit against the US government and the shooter. It will be heard in federal court. Qualified immunity will apply.
8. The shooter will be doxed and his family threatened by leftists, who will cheer this on.
9. There will be rioting in Minneapolis, probably low-grade, since too much will make the left lose sympathy. If it gets serious, look to Trump to send in the armed forces, perhaps under the Insurrection Act.
10. The anti-ICE direct actions will accelerate. Trump will not back down. There will be a decision point facing to the left: Continue the current level of actions, which will have zero effect, or escalate into (further) attempts to murder ICE agents. Some leftists will embrace escalated violence.
The Administration should focus rigorously on the following key points:
1. ICE was present in Minneapolis doing its job removing dangerous criminals.
2. Democrat politicians are creating a dangerous situation with their rhetoric and caused this incident.
3. Democrat activists have been putting people at risk with their dangerous action and it must stop.
4. The communist woman was ordered to stop but attempted to kill a federal agent, who lawfully defended himself with deadly force. WATCH THE VIDEO.
5. WE WILL NOT BACK DOWN FROM MAKING AMERICA SAFE FORM ILLEGAL ALIEN CRIMINALS, INCLUDING FRAUDSTERS.
Kurt Schlichter @KurtSchlichter
A DEEP DIVE -- Thoughts From a Competent Lawyer on the Minneapolis ICE Shooting:
1. The left is positively turgid about this INCIDENT. They wanted a shooting and did everything they could to set the conditions that made it inevitable, from the rhetoric of the Democrat politicians to the provocations on the street. One leftist white lady dead is a small price to pay for the martyr they wanted.
2. Note that yesterday (1/6/26), the Democrats changed from "The feds are the Gestapo" to "A zillion federal officers died defending Our Democracy, and we support these heroes- here's a plaque!" back to "The feds are the Gestapo" the very next day.
3. The law is clear -- you can use deadly force against someone threatening you with deadly force. The ICE agent had no duty to retreat. This does not matter to the left and its narrative. You will see many experts with zero actual knowledge of the law opining -- including the typically terrible cadre of leftist lawyers.
4. The video is clear that the driver was heading at and came in contact with the ICE agent. He had a right to use deadly force to defend himself. This does not matter to the left and its narrative. The left will do everything it can to keep people from looking at the actual video that shows the incident. It will push video that does not show the incident clearly, as well a perjured or irrelevant witness statements.
5. The leftist narrative will be "Trump's ICE nazis are literally murdering innocent people." This will work on Democrats and Republican sissies. Normal people will ask why she did not comply with the officers' orders and why she drove at a cop. Properly addressed, we can leverage the gross irresponsibility of the Dem pols and communist foot soldiers to defeat their bogus narrative.
6. The corrupt state of Minnesota will "investigate" even though its senior officials have already announced that this was murder, and the ICE agent will be indicted in state court. The feds will remove it to federal court, where the case will fail.
7. There will be a civil suit against the US government and the shooter. It will be heard in federal court. Qualified immunity will apply.
8. The shooter will be doxed and his family threatened by leftists, who will cheer this on.
9. There will be rioting in Minneapolis, probably low-grade, since too much will make the left lose sympathy. If it gets serious, look to Trump to send in the armed forces, perhaps under the Insurrection Act.
10. The anti-ICE direct actions will accelerate. Trump will not back down. There will be a decision point facing to the left: Continue the current level of actions, which will have zero effect, or escalate into (further) attempts to murder ICE agents. Some leftists will embrace escalated violence.
The Administration should focus rigorously on the following key points:
1. ICE was present in Minneapolis doing its job removing dangerous criminals.
2. Democrat politicians are creating a dangerous situation with their rhetoric and caused this incident.
3. Democrat activists have been putting people at risk with their dangerous action and it must stop.
4. The communist woman was ordered to stop but attempted to kill a federal agent, who lawfully defended himself with deadly force. WATCH THE VIDEO.
5. WE WILL NOT BACK DOWN FROM MAKING AMERICA SAFE FORM ILLEGAL ALIEN CRIMINALS, INCLUDING FRAUDSTERS.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Ferise1 · 46-50, M
@SumKindaMunster she was shot in the head. She died instantly, but the accelerator was floored
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
G7J2O · M
@sunsporter1649 she didn’t run anyone over. You are being lied to.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
nudistsueaz · 61-69, F
HoeBag · 51-55, F
@nudistsueaz The woman taking the video and screaming at the ICE agent, she is practically begging to be next.
I know if I just saw someone go down in my neighborhood, my backside would be hiding in my house away from the action, NOT outside expressing my opinions.
I know if I just saw someone go down in my neighborhood, my backside would be hiding in my house away from the action, NOT outside expressing my opinions.
nudistsueaz · 61-69, F
@HoeBag I agree.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Ferise1 [media=https://youtu.be/ZrUMVtrCK_Y]
BizSuitStacy · M
Ferise1 · 46-50, M
@BizSuitStacy well duh…
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
BrandNewMan · 61-69, M
@HoeBag Christy Walton, heir to the Walton fortune, has funded several protests. Funding supports staffing at liberal nonprofits who attend and coordinate activities, promote and recruit attendance. providing materials. If not paying directly beyond those people, certainly facilitating involvement.
HoeBag · 51-55, F
@BrandNewMan I was joking about looking for a job, but it seems kind of risky if people are getting paid to protest, like, "Hey here's $100, now go walk into that h3llish landscape and make a scene!"
I kind of like my skin where it is.
I kind of like my skin where it is.
BrandNewMan · 61-69, M
@HoeBag I realized that .. but there is clear evidence of money being put behind some of these things .. they are not purely organic. There is plenty of openly public statements by lib politicians encouraging people to protest knowing direct conflicts will arise. People were trying to enter govt buildings and interfere with ICE operations. They know they are risking people going too far.
butterflybaby75 · 46-50, F
nudistsueaz · 61-69, F
@butterflybaby75 For?
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
HoeBag · 51-55, F
@AmericanAvenger How did she get caught up in all that anyways? I mean she wasn't some ill3gal, so how did she end up in that whole situation?
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
HoeBag · 51-55, F
@AmericanAvenger I do not know if she was LGBT or not, but either way, it doesn't seem like a good idea to aggravate someone who is armed and unlikely to face consequence over their actions.
Even within the LGBT, they are typically the ones who have the biggest attitudes.
Most people, g4y or straight, are just trying to get through life as unscathed as possible.
I do not think the extremists realize that there are ways to oppose situations, but rioting just doesn't solve it.
Radical l3sbian liberal white women
Even within the LGBT, they are typically the ones who have the biggest attitudes.
Most people, g4y or straight, are just trying to get through life as unscathed as possible.
I do not think the extremists realize that there are ways to oppose situations, but rioting just doesn't solve it.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
tenente · 36-40, M
@SumKindaMunster Ok, I admit that I was offside, but to be clear: I wasn't technically doxxing because I didn't add private information to be used to harass, intimidate, or encourage others to target him
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
jackjjackson · M