This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultFun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Should the frenulum be left intact?

If so, why?
Yes, because I doubt we evolved to need a piece of the body surgically removed (obviously not including malfunctioning organs). That’s not how evolution works. There is no logical reason to remove it.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
pdqsailor1 · 61-69, M
There is a condition called frenulum BREVE - a short or tight frenulum that forces the glans out of column with an erection and this condition is a reason to relieve the pressure surgically... However in the VAST majority of men this is not an issue and the frenulum can be left in place when circumcision takes place.. There are many good and valid reasons to circumcise males, there are very few valid purposes and reasons to excise the frenulum.... Traditional JEWISH circumcisions preformed by a trained expert - a MOHEL ALWAYS leave the frenulum in place / alone as it has NOTHING to do with the circumcision... and this is how and why and by whom I was circumcised at eight days of age... The frenulum is a source of pleasure and its removal serves no purpose or reason other than aesthetic preference by SOME.. Frankly penises are functional sexual organs, and not displayed.. Removal of a foreskin positively impacts Women's willingness to provide fellatio (oral sex for men by Women) but the presence or absence of the frenulum has zero impact upon Women's willingness to provide men with this experience/service and its presence certainly has no impact on vaginal intercourse or manual stimulation of the penis...
Jewskinless · 51-55, M
@pdqsailor1
My mum got me circumcised by bris milah and periah as a jew and she told me that she chose that as both my foreskin and frenulum would be obliterated
pdqsailor1 · 61-69, M
@Jewskinless she chose? Highly unusual
supersnipe · 61-69, M
Why would you [i]not[/i] leave it intact? I've got a strange feeling it wouldn't be a good idea to mess with it 😶
Bowenw · 61-69, M
I didn't know there was another option. I think it's best to be left intact.
jackson55 · M
Everything should be left intact.
Jewskinless · 51-55, M
@jackson55
I am a jew and had to be circumcised, my mum insisted
Patriot96 · 56-60, C
So many nerve endings
PunkRockSuperStar · 56-60, M
I read that the frenulum usually doesn't develop when a cock is circumcised at birth, and the evidence appears to bear that out. In any case, doesn't it look better without? It allows the cock to be straighter when hard.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Jewskinless · 51-55, M
No, my mum had my frenulum fully removed and although it denuded me, i am happy with her decision
Lanyx · 41-45, M
I am voting for yes. It will make the circumcision feel more complete.
ShaneMckay · 41-45, M
The what???
UpForItNow · 22-25, F
@ShaneMckay The thin sensitive strip of skin that joins the head of your penis to the shaft, sometimes though not always removed during circumcision.
Babaloo64 · 41-45, M
@UpForItNow rightly said
Jewskinless · 51-55, M
@UpForItNow
My mum told me that she chose my bris milah and periah as it meant that my foreskin and frenulum were obliterated and that is what she wanted
Muthafukajones · 46-50, M
Which one?

 
Post Comment