Should the frenulum be left intact?

Yes, because I doubt we evolved to need a piece of the body surgically removed (obviously not including malfunctioning organs). That’s not how evolution works. There is no logical reason to remove it.

There is a condition called frenulum BREVE - a short or tight frenulum that forces the glans out of column with an erection and this condition is a reason to relieve the pressure surgically... However in the VAST majority of men this is not an issue and the frenulum can be left in place when circumcision takes place.. There are many good and valid reasons to circumcise males, there are very few valid purposes and reasons to excise the frenulum.... Traditional JEWISH circumcisions preformed by a trained expert - a MOHEL ALWAYS leave the frenulum in place / alone as it has NOTHING to do with the circumcision... and this is how and why and by whom I was circumcised at eight days of age... The frenulum is a source of pleasure and its removal serves no purpose or reason other than aesthetic preference by SOME.. Frankly penises are functional sexual organs, and not displayed.. Removal of a foreskin positively impacts Women's willingness to provide fellatio (oral sex for men by Women) but the presence or absence of the frenulum has zero impact upon Women's willingness to provide men with this experience/service and its presence certainly has no impact on vaginal intercourse or manual stimulation of the penis...

Why would you not leave it intact? I've got a strange feeling it wouldn't be a good idea to mess with it 😶

I didn't know there was another option. I think it's best to be left intact.

The frenulum is a decent pleasure point on the glans of the penis.. so long as there is no physical deflection on erection Frenulum breve - a short frenulum.. there is no reason to excise it as part of a circumcision .. it really has nothing to do with a circumcision or the foreskin in the first place it is a distinct anatomical feature of the penis... Once the offensive foreskin is removed there is normally no reason to touch the frenulum... As I have said - in Jewish Circumcisions the frenulum is LEFT intact.. this is true for both infant circumcisions and of adult circumcisions done as part of a religious conversion..

Everything should be left intact.

So many nerve endings

I read that the frenulum usually doesn't develop when a cock is circumcised at birth, and the evidence appears to bear that out. In any case, doesn't it look better without? It allows the cock to be straighter when hard.

No, my mum had my frenulum fully removed and although it denuded me, i am happy with her decision

I am voting for yes. It will make the circumcision feel more complete.

probably not - i assume you're against retaining it, @UpForItNow

I’m not even sure I know what that is either. I’m cut though.

The what???

What do you prefer?

Which one?

Which one?