Foriegn aid is the practice of poor people in rich countries giving money to the rich in poor countries
and tax is poor paying rich
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
jackieash · 26-30
I've noticed there has been an increase in the number of Charity ads on telly recently (Water aid, etc, Donkey Aid, etc).
As far as tax is concerned, it is not exactly rocket science that those who benefit the most from taz cuts are those at the wealthiest end.
As far as tax is concerned, it is not exactly rocket science that those who benefit the most from taz cuts are those at the wealthiest end.
View 3 more replies »
SteelHands · 61-69, M
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout Yeah tell me about it. I just watched a vid from a guy explaining his opinion of how sanctions made Russia stronger.
And another one how Putin was disappointed by Tucker's softball interview questions. And still another one where a guy that refuses to watch the NFL called the game 2 weeks in advance and picked up a 500$ bet.
Us "merkinz" ain't as dumb as they thunk. Lol
And another one how Putin was disappointed by Tucker's softball interview questions. And still another one where a guy that refuses to watch the NFL called the game 2 weeks in advance and picked up a 500$ bet.
Us "merkinz" ain't as dumb as they thunk. Lol
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout · 41-45, MVIP
@SteelHands blowing up nordstream only made putins gas more expensive $$.
He’s killing it.
Why dems and warren buffet dontt want the keystone pipe..
Cheaper transport..
He’s killing it.
Why dems and warren buffet dontt want the keystone pipe..
Cheaper transport..
SteelHands · 61-69, M
[media=https://youtu.be/NkVZF4pd7eY]
About half of this is a tardy advertisement for metals investment that may no longer be actually valid.
There are still a number of unusual observations using economic terminology not familiar to me so i believe it's worth a quik watch.
About half of this is a tardy advertisement for metals investment that may no longer be actually valid.
There are still a number of unusual observations using economic terminology not familiar to me so i believe it's worth a quik watch.
SteelHands · 61-69, M
85% or more is always just deducted and costs are built into the collection accounting and dispersing of said funds as well. Just like in a given aid or charity scam by non profits.
Who else would give their blessing to such a scheme but a big bunch of lawmakers?
Corruption. It's on the agenda. Is there room for expansion into new areas? Lol
Who else would give their blessing to such a scheme but a big bunch of lawmakers?
Corruption. It's on the agenda. Is there room for expansion into new areas? Lol
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
sladejr · 56-60, M
Explains the Clinton Foundation perfectly. Although they’d never go to Haiti, they collected millions on their behalf. Then gave them a pittance of it
MrsMONAKanful · 36-40, F
Yes but they get a lot more i return than the rich do paying taxes
sunriselover · M
Giving money to accountants actually.
BigGuy2 · 26-30, M
The UK gave REGULARLY [b]£278 MILLION [/b]in foreign aid to India - India, a country that has a Space Industry that costs [b]BILLIONS[/b]
BigGuy2 · 26-30, M
@sunriselover i remember after Diana died, her 'charity' ran by relations of Diana were flying around the World in private jets
sunriselover · M
@BigGuy2 But having said that, you have some control over what you give to local charities.
Food banks, hospices, support for disabled children, night shelters.
Food banks, hospices, support for disabled children, night shelters.
BigGuy2 · 26-30, M
@sunriselover well said, that's where donations should go, so you can more or less see instantly where your money is spent