Experts are baffled by the 500% increase

@SW-User wow really?

@MasterLee Yes! She's still following me around downvoting me all over the place because I upset her like a week ago. Aren't you, my chubby little sugardumpling 😘🤗

@SW-User no

@WalterF Do you have factual evidence for anything you allege, or is it all just idle speculation? I would love to see some factual evidence from you for a change.

@windinhishair Apparently Fauci and Gates disagree with you, according to their independent statements in the last week or so. But, says Fauci, this makes it essential to get the booster. The first two didn't work, so let's do a third one.

Really?

Has it been tested? Why should this one work when the first two didn't? Where does their certainty come from? Will people need a fourth one once this one stops working? So many questions... enough to make any sensible peron hesitate lengthily... But in the meantime, so much MONEY! another 50% in the coffers!

Your body, your choice. Not my problem.

Oh and by the way, as I have previously said, I will give you NOTHING save answers to your questions and comments on your remarks. If you think I am going to put names of scientists, site addresses, peer-reviewed study reports up here so that you can use your beloved fact-checker solutions to rubbish them, then I'm sorry to say that I will not be giving you that satisfaction.

@WalterF I am not avoiding anything it is pointless. It is simply true. And it is anagrams. But it is irrelevant because it is just a party trick that has nothing to do with anything. It is not a spooky and doesn't even make sense. You might as well look for signs in bird entrails.


Well a source is meaningless if you can't back it up with anything. That is not facts, that is unsubstantiated opinion.

All kinds of radical claims and still zero evidence or proof of anything.

And now you say you will not provide proof unless I just take it on blind faith. You are making my case for me.

@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow No, I'm inviting you to look and think outside the box. (Have you always been a meek follower - never a bit of a rebel?)

But I can't help you, because you will rubbish everything I would bring to the debate. So, work on your own. Don't systematically trust your sworn authorities the fact-checkers. Go beyond them. Give yourself the satisfaction of studying and refuting these chicken-farmers turned tinpot scientists who gave a different message. Do something for yourself! Stand on your own feet!

@WalterF Being a medical researcher is a bit more complicated than having a can do attitude and ridiculous amounts of self confidence.

@MarkPaul Not feeling a victim in any sense of the term, you got that one really wrong. Try another fact-checker ID... the youtube fanatic doesn't work, the anti-vaxxer doesn't work (some vaccines are essential, I only have problems with the current rushed and unreliable one). But as for victimhood, no way, it's an interesting idea and I'm just thinking about it now for the first time... No, actually, am feeling on top of the world, it's great to be one step ahead of the obedient compliant masses. Strange though, I would have expected a lot of you guys to have a rebellious streak (like, me wear a mask when I go out? go to hell!), but no, you just roll over, swallow the hype, stay glued to your TVs, anxious to learn and follow the latest guidelines, earn your brownie points... I'd much rather be free.

Sorry - try again.

@WalterF Oh, yeah... you sound like you are totally free (of common sense). Enjoy!

@MarkPaul Thanks! On that note of freedom (freedom from injected substances), I bid you adieu.

@DeluxedEdition Unfortunately that's been true for a long time now. Which is pretty fucked up.

@DeluxedEdition screwed up as things are right now, I might actually buy that story.

@Cutiepi23 Probably a bunch of NFL players in gang warfare.

@BeefySenpie The source is the news.

@quitwhendone She's trying to say that the COVID vaccine is causing heart attacks, which we of course know it isn't.

@BlueMetalChick Oh. 🙄