Yes, those of us who actually believe in protecting children, can only hope this is the beginning of the dominos beginning to fall. This will be a long process to bring them all to justice, so we must not let it fade into history as "accusations."
@cherokeepatti I agree. I am a Democrat but I said at the time that if he had been an executive at any company in the country he would have been fired immediately.
@jackieash If you are referring to the epstein files, I think naming the tooth that bit you while backing into a saw blade would be easier. I think this hornets nest is pretty deep.
@cherokeepatti notice Hillary dodging questions her and Bill were both on the plane multiple times, Epstein and Maxwell were at the White House, she was at Chelsea's wedding but Hillary can't remember ever meeting her
@saragoodtimes sorry to jump in, but without seeing all of the Epstein files, no one really knows if Trump and others were on the island and or involved in the alleged activities. It strikes me as interesting, when people thought that they would find Mrs. Clinton involved in pedophilia or worse, the reps all wanted the files released. Now that the information is closer to the administration, there is an attempt to prevent the release.
@Convivial but they should not have done it... The Royal family knew what he was doing, they paid Virginia £15 million and put a gagging order on her so she couldn't speak about it during the jubilee
Actually, it's not irrelevant. A prince is a high position that's always in line for the throne, no matter how far removed from succession. This type of position would expect the Royal family, or even the Reigning Crown to protect the Monarch's name and Family's reputation. The fact that the King is allowing the law to take it's course is promising to the people. Now if there is no protection for a prince from the law, then a president who, by written law, is subject to the law should not be sheltered from the law.