If a Prince can be held accountable, so can a President

@swirlie

Actually, it's not irrelevant. A prince is a high position that's always in line for the throne, no matter how far removed from succession. This type of position would expect the Royal family, or even the Reigning Crown to protect the Monarch's name and Family's reputation. The fact that the King is allowing the law to take it's course is promising to the people. Now if there is no protection for a prince from the law, then a president who, by written law, is subject to the law should not be sheltered from the law.

@calicuz
Nobody said that a President should be sheltered from the law. You raised issue with that, not me and not the OP of this thread.

My only comment was that a Prince is irrelevant in the grand scheme of things when placed in the same context setting as a sitting President.

@swirlie

Apparently we all agree, we're just saying it a little differently.