Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
Top | New | Old
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
It's supposed to be an investment into your future. You take the loan out to get the education you need to get a job and pay back the loan. You should have a goal when you choose to pursue a higher education.

It's not a handout. I took out student loans to go to tech school. The school went bankrupt in the middle of my education. I still had to pay the loans back.
Bonby · 61-69, M
@SumKindaMunster first get the government out of it,anytime the government promises to pay ,the price skyrockets! And the government screws things up every time second parents and students need to find out if the education will be worth the job they will be getting. If you take courses on subjects that don't pay very well ,it's a ,waste! Go to a trade school. Schools that don't tell kids exactly what they are getting into gets a huge fine! For starters
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@wishforthenight @Bonby Interesting comments. Thank you both.
This message was deleted by its author.

dancingtongue · 80-89, M
Far more complex issue than just that, but that is one of the negative fall outs. It's sort of like credit card use: they have their purpose but if you can't afford to pay it off quickly -- ideally within a month before the usury interest rates that used to be illegal kick in--they can be a death spiral. But for adolescents and young adults, it feels like free money so they tend to binge for the immediate gratification.

I was fortunate. I and my family could never have afforded me getting a college education if it wasn't a period when taxpayers were still investing in public education as a way to build an educated workforce that would attract employers into the state. There was no tuition. I still had to work two, sometimes three part-time jobs, while going to school to pay for room & board, books, and incidental costs. But it was doable.

Then public funding largely dried up, the public universities had to start charging tuition and could charge foreign and out of state students more so in-state residents took a back seat. The Federal student loan program was supposed to be a solution, but became part of the problem. While it is guaranteed by the government, it is run by the private sector. Financial institutions and for-profit educational institutions are rife with predatory practices, fraudulent promises, atrocious interest rates. And when it gets turned over to collection agencies, it gets even worse.

The other alternative new since my era are 529 accounts. But again, those in poverty and living paycheck to paycheck can't afford to put much, if any, into such accounts so it is back to your original premise of it being a poverty tax.
wishforthenight · 36-40New
@dancingtongue You're right, this is a complex issue, and that is exactly the problem. We’ve taken something that should be simple (access to education) and turned it into a mess of debt traps, profit-driven lending, and financial barriers.

The era you described, when public funding made college genuinely accessible, only shows how much things have changed. Instead of investing in an educated workforce through public support, the cost is now pushed onto students, especially those from low-income families, and expect them to carry the burden alone. That ain't fair.

Student loans are not just like credit cards. They are often worse. At least credit cards offer bankruptcy protection. Federal student loans do not, and the repayment terms can last decades. And while 529 plans sound good in theory, they are completely out of reach for families living paycheck to paycheck. You can't save what you don't have.

So sorry but yes, it functions like a poverty tax. Wealthy students pay tuition once. Poor students pay interest for years on top of tuition for the exact same education. This is not just unfair. It is a system designed to punish people for being born without money.
dancingtongue · 80-89, M
@wishforthenight Not to mention an inbred society for the entitled, protected, few rather than a society where everyone has an opportunity to achieve their potential as originally envisioned and embodied in the Horatio Alger myth.
Sazzio · 36-40, M
It's a loan to pay off from your wages I guess.

I have a car loan for 4 yrs (less than 3 now) and redundancy at my w/p been announced. My job can go but this loan will not stop. Good news, many many employees volunteered to be made redundant so I MIGHT not get the bullet. However, this year and all of next year will be filled with dread and uncertainty.
redredred · M
I can’t afford an Audi R8 so I’d haven’t gone into debt to buy one. Who forced you to go to college? Who forced you to go into debt to pay for it? Why didn’t you learn a trade? Electricians, plumbers, carpenters and HVAC mechanics make great money and get paid during their apprenticeship.
wishforthenight · 36-40New
@redredred And you did this? Or did you have the means to pay?
Bonby · 61-69, M
@wishforthenight I did this
This message was deleted by its author.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
They would pay more if the repayments are with interest.

The only schools in the UK that charge are the public ones - by British definition, meaning fee-paying private. (The term is historical, referring to how they originated.)

Universities charge but students can take loans repayable only once they start earning above a certain threshold - I am not sure what that is now. Though it is likely to be at a time when they are also trying to save for the deposit and mortgage on a home.
ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M
It's life -- some people have trouble living with life. But if we want to "forgive" student debt, I think that forgiveness should be based on the person's income AFTER graduation. Got a good job making a couple of hundred thousand a year after college, you should be paying off your debt. Unemployed, no income after school, forgiveness might be in order.
meJess · F
Tax is obligatory, a loan is a choice. Many people who take trade jobs, like electricians, earn more than many university graduates and don’t have student debt.

If you are smart enough to go to university you are smart enough to do the math on salary uplift compared to other careers.
Bonby · 61-69, M
@meJess that's Truth right there
wishforthenight · 36-40New
@meJess That's not a fair comment. You're oversimplifying by treating student loans as a true choice, when many low-income students have no other way to access education.

Sure, trades can pay much better, but not everyone is suited to them, and society needs lower-paid but essential graduates too.

Also, assuming all students can "do the math" ignores unequal access to guidance. You can be "smart" but that doesn't mean you're financially literate.
It can be.

The people most affected by it were the students who attended for-profit institutions, some of which used lies as inducing conditions to get students to take out loans which would ultimately ruin them.

Outlawing for-profit schools and for-profit medicine would help the country a lot.
Going to college isn't a human right. If you take a loan out to pay for it you need to pay it back. I didn't go to college and don't want my tax money going to pay off loans for those who did .
Adrift · 61-69, F
Nope, I personally know of someone who had the ability to pay. Racked up a bunch of student loans and then sat there and told me with an attitude of entitlement that the government was going to forgive all her debt.
Who ultimately gets to pay that debt?
The working taxpayer.
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
It can be regressive and it can penalise disproportionately students who set their sights on low paying professions such as school teaching or nursing.

In the UK you do not start making repayments until you are earning an average graduate entry level wage. All unpaid debts are written off after 25 years.
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
Sort of.

It is a con if you were sold the idea that "whatever the cost, you need to find a way to survive a college education for your employment prospects.

It's estimated that most graduates don't survive long in their chosen field simply because starting salaries are so low most seek better paid jobs elsewhere
4meAndyou · F
You COULD choose to work and save the money, and THEN go to college. OR, you could take up an apprenticeship in HVAC, plumbing, electricians, or any of the lucrative trades, and end up earning MORE money than most college grads.
That’s one way of looking at it. In my case, going to college opened the door from poor to rich.
We also had better financial aid through the gov't.

When we went to mostly private loans, the costs of borrowing went up.
come2gether · 46-50, M
in10RjFox · M
It's a punishment for believing in Education and getting lured into it for life and unable to get a job to payback. So the university must pay minimum wages during the unemployed period. And a graduate will then borrow from hookers and loan sharks who make more money without any student loan...

Instead if they start going for jobs and not take loans, the fees will start to come down and they can study after a few years with some good savings, rather than entering an university with loan and no savings and having to depend on parents.
Jake966 · 56-60, M
Wrong, a person chooses to take out a loan to go to school just like choosing to take out a loan to get a car
AthrillatheHunt · 51-55, M
It’s not a form of punishment . Having the funds is a form of privilege. You are not being punished , you are merely underprivileged.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
TexChik · F
@wishforthenight oh a grammar nazi! How quaint
wishforthenight · 36-40New
@TexChik Still doesn't explain why poor people should pay more for the same education, though :)
TexChik · F
@wishforthenight No one owes the poor an education. No one has a choice of the socioeconomic station they are born into. Like you, they can whine and complain about the unfairness of it all, or they can step up and work to improve it. It's available to them, just not for free. I paid my student loans off a long time ago and was happy to do it. Freedom isn't free either. Some pay the ultimate price, while others do nothing for the same freedom.
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
Student loan lenders charge students 10x the interest they charge to banks to borrow money.
Voting blue is how you make it forever!
No socislists. Just this. Only war, genocide and inequality. Lotsa poverty. You're a bipartisan country with no commies!
The main issue is that education costs just continue to rise exponentially, but the quality of the education stagnates or drops.
And then, whose fucking hiring for that degree? No one.

It's a racket.
This message was deleted by its author.
This message was deleted by its author.
wishforthenight · 36-40New
@MarmeeMarch I think you're deliberately confusing personal choice with systemic failure. Sure people choose to attend college, but they don’t choose to be born into poverty or take on crushing debt just to access opportunity.

The cost of college has exploded while wages haven’t kept up. That’s not bad luck, that’s a rigged system.

Saying “I suffered, so everyone else should too” isn’t fairness. It’s bitterness. We don’t build a better future by clinging to broken systems just because they were hard on previous generations.
This message was deleted by its author.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
wishforthenight · 36-40New
@sunsporter1649 So you admit colleges are hoarding billions, but instead of criticizing them, you're mocking the people stuck paying for it. Tells me exactly whose side you're on.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@wishforthenight Your lack of comprehension is astounding
wishforthenight · 36-40New
@sunsporter1649 Nice. “I win because I said so”. Bold strategy.

Still waiting on an actual counterpoint though, something beyond memes and catchphrases. But if pretending confusion = victory helps you sleep at night, who am I to interrupt the dream?🤭
wildbill83 · 41-45, M
[media=https://youtu.be/aczcjP0LfNI]

 
Post Comment