Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Student debt is a poverty tax on low income families

Students who have to take out loans to go to school wind up paying more than rich people who just pay out of pocket up front.

Ultimately, it's a form of punishment for being low income and wanting higher education.

Correct?
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
dancingtongue · 80-89, M
Far more complex issue than just that, but that is one of the negative fall outs. It's sort of like credit card use: they have their purpose but if you can't afford to pay it off quickly -- ideally within a month before the usury interest rates that used to be illegal kick in--they can be a death spiral. But for adolescents and young adults, it feels like free money so they tend to binge for the immediate gratification.

I was fortunate. I and my family could never have afforded me getting a college education if it wasn't a period when taxpayers were still investing in public education as a way to build an educated workforce that would attract employers into the state. There was no tuition. I still had to work two, sometimes three part-time jobs, while going to school to pay for room & board, books, and incidental costs. But it was doable.

Then public funding largely dried up, the public universities had to start charging tuition and could charge foreign and out of state students more so in-state residents took a back seat. The Federal student loan program was supposed to be a solution, but became part of the problem. While it is guaranteed by the government, it is run by the private sector. Financial institutions and for-profit educational institutions are rife with predatory practices, fraudulent promises, atrocious interest rates. And when it gets turned over to collection agencies, it gets even worse.

The other alternative new since my era are 529 accounts. But again, those in poverty and living paycheck to paycheck can't afford to put much, if any, into such accounts so it is back to your original premise of it being a poverty tax.
wishforthenight · 36-40
@dancingtongue You're right, this is a complex issue, and that is exactly the problem. We’ve taken something that should be simple (access to education) and turned it into a mess of debt traps, profit-driven lending, and financial barriers.

The era you described, when public funding made college genuinely accessible, only shows how much things have changed. Instead of investing in an educated workforce through public support, the cost is now pushed onto students, especially those from low-income families, and expect them to carry the burden alone. That ain't fair.

Student loans are not just like credit cards. They are often worse. At least credit cards offer bankruptcy protection. Federal student loans do not, and the repayment terms can last decades. And while 529 plans sound good in theory, they are completely out of reach for families living paycheck to paycheck. You can't save what you don't have.

So sorry but yes, it functions like a poverty tax. Wealthy students pay tuition once. Poor students pay interest for years on top of tuition for the exact same education. This is not just unfair. It is a system designed to punish people for being born without money.
dancingtongue · 80-89, M
@wishforthenight Not to mention an inbred society for the entitled, protected, few rather than a society where everyone has an opportunity to achieve their potential as originally envisioned and embodied in the Horatio Alger myth.