Wiseacre · F
I would certainly trust it for scans, but I prefer the human touch. I think in the long run, it is pretty accurate in data analysis.
PatientlyWaiting25 · 46-50, F
No but it's probably useful as a tool for doctors to use maybe in pathology or analysing scans. I just don't want to know it's been used.
Wiseacre · F
Zaphod42 · 51-55, M
About as much as I trust WebMD. Once, just for fun, I put my flu symptoms into WebMD…turns out I had Ebola. 🤷♂


FreddieUK · 70-79, M
Definitely not.
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
Not unsupervised by a human. Right now I would not trust it to provide an accurate summary of a 15 minute meeting.
nevergiveup · 61-69, M
I dont trust a doctor so why would i trust AI
Wiseacre · F
@nevergiveup sorry for u bc sooner or later u’ll need a doc.
Absolutely not. I wouldn't even trust it for a dinner recipe or summary of historical events.
Subsumedpat · 36-40, M
It is more often right but when it is wrong that is a problem a human would notice.
Nitedoc · 51-55, M
No.
EBSVC · 36-40, T
No
Zonuss · 46-50, M
No.













