Roundandroundwego · 61-69
I think they also indicated that paying back the tarrifs would not be practical, so, no refunds. But I kept listening to the end of the statement. Maybe only your part is real.
View 3 more replies »
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@beckyromero yes, the court agreed , and the majority cited past repayments that should be treated as the standard, this time. They said they should
return the case to the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) to address the specific issue of refunds.
Cavanaugh used the word "chaos" in his dissent, seeming to indicate that doing hard stuff is unlikely.
return the case to the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) to address the specific issue of refunds.
Cavanaugh used the word "chaos" in his dissent, seeming to indicate that doing hard stuff is unlikely.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@Roundandroundwego
For Cavanaugh, even drinking beer is complicated.
But this is why we keep tax records. Shouldn't be difficult at all. Detractors just want to make it seem like it is complicated.
For Cavanaugh, even drinking beer is complicated.
But this is why we keep tax records. Shouldn't be difficult at all. Detractors just want to make it seem like it is complicated.
Charity · 70-79
@beckyromero
That would be a first, retailers care nothing of the customer, only that the customer buy their goods unlike it was in the 1950s when they gave customers gifts or ways to purchase gifts show appreciation.
The retailers, if they're losing anything it would be a small, very small amount because they have passed the cost to the customer.
If they were to win in court more money in their pockets and no loss.
That would be a first, retailers care nothing of the customer, only that the customer buy their goods unlike it was in the 1950s when they gave customers gifts or ways to purchase gifts show appreciation.
The retailers, if they're losing anything it would be a small, very small amount because they have passed the cost to the customer.
If they were to win in court more money in their pockets and no loss.
beckyromero · 36-40, F
Sorry, but Australians aren't due any refunds. Not one penny.
Foreign exporters did not pay the tariffs. American importers pay the tariffs (and generally pass on the cost of those tariffs to their American consumers).
Foreign exporters did not pay the tariffs. American importers pay the tariffs (and generally pass on the cost of those tariffs to their American consumers).
beckyromero · 36-40, F
@whowasthatmaskedman
Trump prefers Argentine beef. Probably because he envisions himself as a member of the military junta in the early '80s. Australia? No dictators for him to admire Down Under.
Trump prefers Argentine beef. Probably because he envisions himself as a member of the military junta in the early '80s. Australia? No dictators for him to admire Down Under.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@beckyromero He cant even complete a real estate deal here. Because we ask too many questions..
CreyvinMoorhead · 36-40, M
Thevy29 · 41-45, M
1.4 billion? Sounds very small compared to what we’re owed. A lot like the Australian governments failure to meet the demands of the nursing strike.
Nanoose · 70-79, M
Trump has already started bad mouthing the Supreme court judges. And he has started threatening adding an additional 10% to global tariffs. Cheers and happy weekend!
bookerdana · M
Anyway you look at it you lose..tariffs are a tax on the American people🥸
bookerdana · M
@whowasthatmaskedman Never expecting the repercussions,plus Harris was kind of a last minute ,untested and hardly a consensus nominee
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@bookerdana I agree. The Democrat campaign was poorly handled from Day one. Biden went in as a one term President and should have played that hand from the start.😷..
bookerdana · M
@whowasthatmaskedman The debate fiasco🤦♀ too late now,its forward into the breach⚔
Khenpal1 · M
Its just noise , translated it means 400 billions less treasure bonds sold or simply sold by not renewing. More debt for USA to pay off. More companies will diversify.
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@Khenpal1 If only it were that simple.. When others dont buy American Treasury bonds, the Fed mandates that banks have to buy more to comply and US pension funds are also pushed into buying more. That doesnt sound so bad. But the value of those bonds is exclusively in printed $ and as ther purchasing power of the $US drops the value of the banks looks risky. This is exactly what happened to the Silicone Valley bank. And the purchasing power of everyones pension fund drops, And lets not forget Social Security is also a big holder and already heading for insolvency..😷
Nick1 · 61-69, M
He imposed tariffs unilaterally. Let him pay all refunds. He and his family already made a fortune.
tenente · 36-40, M
"We'll excuse fascism but we draw the line at mercantilism." - Scotus (probably)
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@RachelLia2003 I thought Liza Minelli was the one bimbo who didnt know the difference between Austria and Australia..😷
RachelLia2003 · 22-25, F
@whowasthatmaskedman i aint lisa. im rachel lia. your talking about the one that has kangoroos and hitler i know. its austria
CreyvinMoorhead · 36-40, M
beckyromero · 36-40, F
CreyvinMoorhead · 36-40, M

















