@Piano - And perhaps everyone else?
When you see a house, you look at it and wonder who built it, there's no question about whether it was built there or simply made itself, you know that someone gathered the material, thought it through, and spent time to knock it all together. Someone had to build it, it didn't get there by itself. So why would we not assume that for something far more complex than a little house?
If we take a moment to think here, a clock can't create itself, a house can't build itself, and a computer can't put itself into existence by it's own wish, and those are simple constructions. Yet somehow people want to believe that the laws of physics created themselves, that life created itself, and that a world full of chain reactions and working laws and natural things, popped into existence and co-worked with each other in a perfect manner, and atheists say that it... came from a time where nothing ever even existed. How can a house be built by air? How can a clock exist if no one constructed its parts?
If someone goes ahead and says "there was never a beginning in the first place, it has always been" to a group of well educated atheists, then they would deem you to be a fool. But even then, if you said to them "i made a clock, from the presence of nonexistence" they would also call you a fool. Then after you've made those two statements, you can ask them "Then how did universe come to be? If there was no material to build with before everything came into existence, then it could not build itself in the first place, right?", and they will look at you with question marks written on their foreheads. They will speak of how long time it must have took and say "there must be a better answer than saying that someone has always existed and created everything around us".
Okay so we've already come to the conclusion that you can't make something, from nothingness. Something can't just pop into existence like that. So that means that there never was a beginning to start with... Something out there, has always existed, that's a fact.
Now what existed for an eternity back then? Well we do know that whatever it was, it created everything around us. It could have been materials to cause an explosion that existed for an eternity until this happened, or a mind of its own.
Now you tell me what sounds more logical to you... What belief is more believable, more logical? Number 1? Number 2? Number 3?
1# The belief that there was a beginning and nothing before that, meaning that material just popped into existence out of nothingness, and that was the first thing that ever did do so.
2# The belief that this particular material that somehow managed to create everything around us in a perfect manner, has always existed. Meaning for an eternity...
3# The belief that an Almighty God has lived for an eternity, and then at his wish, he created everything we know to be a world, and linked it all together perfectly with much thought given to it.
I'll answer it myself, number 3# is the right one. As number one is simply caused by ignorance, nothing has ever managed to create itself from nonexistence. As number two would not make any sense on its own, how and why would material exist for an eternity? Number 3# is right because there's so much evidence behind it, you can look at the world on its own, and you will understand: "this did not come here on its own, it must have been built by someone".
