Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Science Can't Disprove Christianity [Spirituality & Religion]

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQN5IWafUaI]

It's true, it's been true, and it always will be true: science can't disprove Christianity. Why should it since it was ordained by God, Himself. Yahweh ordained science to benefit mankind in learning about Yahweh's creation and how He's made it work. Skeptics realize this even though they'll deny it. This is why they get frustrated and resort to ridiculing, mocking, and throwing tantrums. They do their best at trying to discredit us and our Heavenly Father and still fail at accepting the fact that Yahweh lives and His Word is Truth. All we can do at this point is pray for them and not get into foolish arguments with them lest we become fools like they make themselves out to be. I feel sorry for them, I really do.
You're confusing categories. Christianity can neither be proven nor disproven, not by science, or logic, or any other means. The definition of "faith" is belief in something without proof. This is why Kierkegaard said that the man who succeeded in proving the truth of Christianity beyond any doubt whatsoever, by doing so would have destroyed it.

Science, outside of mathematics, doesn't "prove" anything either, which is why we have scientific theories. A theory is a model to explain observations, and is "true" insofar as it still applies when new observations are made. If the new observations contradict the theory, it can be modified or discarded and replaced. One example would be Newton's theory of gravity, which was later modified by Einstein's theory of relativity. That doesn't make Newton wrong; it only means that relativistic effects become apparent under extremely high gravitational conditions.

As for your approach where you insult everyone who disagrees with you, the effect that has is to make your religion look like a refuge for arrogant, sanctimonious jackasses. If someone was considering Christianity, why would they want to be associated with an offensive shithead like you? You are repelling more people than you're attracting, which I suspect is your intention, because if everyone was a Christian, you wouldn't have anyone else to feel superior to.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Entwistle It is a method by which the God speaks to His people. It is much like a radio. I listen to music on the radio but I don't expect the radio to make music or play music. All by itself the bible is a a bunch of papers. Without the Spirit it is meaningless. That is why so many atheists make the stupid mistake of trying to find contradictions in it. I listen to the radio and hear two different accounts of the same event. Do I trash the radio because it 'lied'?
Entwistle · 56-60, M
@hippyjoe1955 So the bible is a method by which God speaks to his people. You don't worship gods word?
Let me give an analogy..I am a guitar player..if Jimi Hendrix had written a manual on how to play guitar then do you think I should follow its advice?
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Entwistle Following the advice is not worship. It is taking the advice. Over the centuries the advice found in the Bible is sound advice. To use your analogy you could learn the guitar from Jimi Hendrix or you could learn from me. I don't know a thing about a guitar beyond the fact it has 6 strings. The Bible is unique in that level of sound advice. There is nothing even in the same league.
ozgirl512 · 26-30, F
I think gallilo had this discussion a few hundred years back ..
SW-User
@LadyGrace For sure :) Take care 🤗
@SW-User ❤️
@Speedyman Amen, brother!! Truer words were never spoken. Well at least that's one of them that's true hahaha
HeteroDox · 36-40, F
you will never convince the delusionally indoctrinated .... this person has likely been programmed from birth to accept all of it because his subconscious has been terrorized to accept. He believes he will hangout with a horned demon if he doesnt kiss gods ass and financially support him.
HeteroDox · 36-40, F
@Speedyman is it? i give to my community daily... you hang out on here and spew your indoctrinate hatred... you said it correct... you arent a good christian, just old dead weight with dexterity - for now
Speedyman · 70-79, M
You poor tragic soul@HeteroDox
HeteroDox · 36-40, F
@Speedyman You poor useless burden on society :)
MasterLee · 56-60, M
It can disprove many of the claims like bats are birds and cloven vs uncloven. Or violations of physics. If people choose to believe the fiction it's their problem.
Speedyman · 70-79, M
No but it appears to confuse you. I am quite clear on the matter @MasterLee
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@Speedyman I wrote you off as ignorant. Go pray somewhere.
Speedyman · 70-79, M
No my friend. Just look in the mirror to see a picture of unbridled ignorance ! @MasterLee
Neena · F
Scientists have many meaningful things to do, so they may not be wasting their time over this. It could just be that some of the discoveries proved some of the beliefs wrong.
It's people who are wasting time thinking science cannot prove or disprove certain things.
BiblicalWarrior · 51-55, M
@Neena He already has answered it, a while ago. She just didn't like the answer she got, and is trying to be a pain in the butt.
@BiblicalWarrior He did not answer it. But if you think he did show me where.
@SW-User He’s intentionally avoiding my question.
Bushranger · 70-79, M
That sounds familiar. Oh, that's right, I've said that before; science can't disprove God. But, alternatively, it can't prove God. Just as God can't prove creation.
Mohana · 46-50, F
Sometimes it just happens that scientific evidence and proofs contradicts some of the beliefs. In such a case it would be more wiser to try and understand what that scientific proof or evidence is. Aim of science is not about proving or disproving God. Science is all about exploring and finding out the truth. It is not about believing something which someone else believe because someone else told her/him that it's the fact.
SW-User
@Mohana Very nicely stated 👌. This should put to rest all the confusions in this post.
SW-User
Science is a tool. The fact that some choose to [b][i][u]believe[/u][/i][/b] something is beyond the scope of science.
Sharon · F
@Speedyman What would you know? Your record here doesn't do you any favours.
Speedyman · 70-79, M
Sharon · F
@Speedyman LOL. You're completely out of touch with reality.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@JBird @wilderflower [quote]Let me get my popcorn. [/quote]

Don't let your popcorn get stale. 😄
JBird · F
@GodSpeed63 don't worry you about it. 🤣
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@JBird [quote]don't worry, about it.[/quote]

Who says I'm worried about it? 😄
I think both sides get tied up here at times. There is no doubt that when Christians share the joy that comes from faith in Christ, some will see that as an attempt to impose their beliefs on others. That is a matter of their perception, not a reflection of reality. If they view our sharing as arrogance, they would be wholly mistaken, as [i]anyone[/i] who feels they have anything of importance to write, does so, but that does not warrant, nor call for it to be labeled as arrogance. It is simply a sharing of beliefs; nothing written in stone that others must believe or they're looked down upon. The essence of sharing, is humbleness in doing so. Not rendering ourselves as better, smarter, nor wiser, than others.
@SW-User I have never claimed to see Jesus. However, I have experienced Him in my life. I gave testimony of that experience in an article, which I share, if people wish to read it. There was no denying He is real. He saved my soul. Whether people believe that or not, is up to them, but no one can take that extraordinary, miraculous experience away from me. That is why I have no doubts whatsoever about Jesus/God, or where I'm going when I die. I asked Jesus to save me, and He did, right then and there, which He has done for thousands of others, besides myself. He immediately transformed me by the giving of the Holy Spirit that He promised to do for each believer, in His Word, upon receiving Jesus as Lord and Savior. I was quite shocked that the God of this universe heard my prayer, but He sure did. I'm still amazed to this day. He proved to me, He is real and He cares and loves us more than anything. He still amazes me to this day. I've been living for Him since the day He saved my soul, July 21, 1973 at 11 o'clock in the evening. Just as I promised I would do. Jesus gave me His best, and still does. I cannot give Him less.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@LadyGrace [quote]There was no denying He is real. He saved my soul. Whether people believe that or not, is up to them, but no one can take that extraordinary, miraculous experience away from me. [/quote]

Amen, sister, amen!!
@GodSpeed63 Amen! Thanks and praise to Jesus, where they belong. 😄☺️🙏🏼
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
Here we go with the negative proof rubbish again.
Science CAN prove that Donald Trump exists and I regard that as sufficient proof that god as we are led to understand him doesnt. Case closed.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@wilderflower [quote]You’re already a passive aggressive coward.[/quote]

You need to quit talking to yourself.
@GodSpeed63 Yeah another clever response from you. Do you read and follow every word of the bible?
SW-User
@GodSpeed63
Are you sure ?
I was searching for an answer to this question. It would be kind of you if you could reply in quora.

https://www.quora.com/Who-is-the-father-of-science
@SW-User He has read my question, he’s just ignoring it.
SW-User
@wilderflower Oh, I meant, he hasn't probably read Bible, not your question 😂
@SW-User He has read my question.
SatanBurger · 36-40, F
Science can't disprove all other religions also or the flying spaghetti monster's existence so if I wanted I could believe in the FSM or Bob.
Harriet03 · 41-45, F
@SW-User [image deleted]
SW-User
@Harriet03 come on 😇 just messing around.
Harriet03 · 41-45, F
@SW-User lol
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
Name one religion, any religion, that science has disproven? Yours is not the only one, none has been disproven. Nor will it attempt to!

Science is a tool, not a belief!

Better to ask why are you so afraid of a tool?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
What if god.. now go with me on this..

Gave the world scientists? 🤔
@SW-User it’s ying and yang innit.. if there was no devil doing devils work, theyrd be no god doing godly work.. each introducing variables to counter each other’s play.. the devil throws in polio.. god throws in a Jonas Salk... presto.
SW-User
@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout Seems like God has lost that one in this case. Consider Cancer is still killing millions of people every year. And that is really the best he got?
@SW-User omg I just bursted out laughing in that comment "is that really the best he got" LMFAO
but yeah cancer is no joke and it's not god's doing that people get healed and such
Entwistle · 56-60, M
So many branches of Christianity have disappeared over the centuries. The current versions will disappear too over time.
Speedyman · 70-79, M
BoldSam · 46-50, F
@Carazaa I agree knowledge will increase in coming days. But how? All these discussions also contribute to increase in knowledge levels. When science proves something, religion updates it's book. When people question something, religious people rethink and come up with a new version. Is this what you mean by knowledge update and revisions of bible. If that is the case then I appreciate what you say👍️
Carazaa · F
@BoldSam Nope! The Bible was written by men who God inspired and Jesus Gods son said that in the last days there would be signs and they are happening now!
BoldSam · 46-50, F
Let's take proper precautions. This post is spreading like corona virus 😱
Both started peaking at the same time.
Harriet03 · 41-45, F
Science has proof for everything it claims to know. Religion does not!! 🤷‍♀️
JBird · F
Science cannot disprove religion.

*Conditions apply😂😂😂😂🤦
Speedyman · 70-79, M
Of course I can’t have an intelligent conversation with you. I don’t think anyone could. @Sharon
Sharon · F
@Speedyman [quote]Of course I can’t have an intelligent conversation with you. I don’t think anyone could. [/quote]
Nearly everyone else can and many do. You're one of the few who can't.
Speedyman · 70-79, M
Dumbest shit I've ever heard/read.
@GodSpeed63 😂🤣
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@GodSpeed63 No, I've been trying to figure out how supposedly rational people can ignore evidence.
@Bushranger But why go back and forth on it, if you do not believe each other? Why not just agree to disagree? I feel for each one of us, we all have our different perspectives but that does not mean the other person is wrong and it does not mean the other person is right. It's all a matter of perspective of the hearer. But as far as evidence, there is plenty of evidence for Christ and his existence. It's just that people do not want to accept it, and what's wrong with that? To each their own. It just seems pointless to argue about it. I mean it could go on forever. Haha
Entwistle · 56-60, M
Common sense disproves Christianity. There is no such thing as the resurrection,virgin birth or miracles that defy physics.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Sharon just don't call me later for supper.
Entwistle · 56-60, M
@hippyjoe1955 The Last Supper? Hasn't that already occurred?
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Entwistle Yes we do communion in commemoration of it regularly. Sadly you don't.
JBird · F
Is that why the churches shut down and people had to rush off to hospitals when virus broke out? 😂
SW-User
John Dewey has no context in this exchange.
The work of David Hackett Fischer
Does.

Because, you don’t understand something and are too proud to ask a question, doesn’t make my point of view a misconception. @Speedyman
Speedyman · 70-79, M
@SW-User yes it is an informal fallacy that occurs when one assumes that decision makers of the past viewed events from the same perspective and having the same information as those subsequently analyzing the decision. You are a good illustration of someone who makes such a fallacy. It’s interesting how someone can kid themselves
SW-User
I know what it is🙄..good that you understand.

Have you read the book?
Clearly not...
The fact that I borrowed the name of a book is no reflection on thought process in general.

It’s a random choice.
Given that we have yet to discuss anything at a scholarly level, your descriptions are your own opinions.

Attacking a user name is otherwise a ridiculous exercise.

@Speedyman
CaptainKirk · 41-45, M
Science also can’t disprove Bigfoot, the Loch Ness monster or the Easter bunny, nor does it have to
whowasthatmaskedman · 70-79, M
@CaptainKirk Thank goodness you left the tooth fairy and Santa alone. My grandkids would have come looking for you.😉
CaptainKirk · 41-45, M
@whowasthatmaskedman why would I mention things that science can prove?
From looking at the answers here, it's still the same old arguments. They know it. They just don't want to admit it. I don't think that will change. That's obvious from the answers here. I could go on and on to the ridiculous remarks here that even contradict themselves, but I won't waste my time.

Science proved Christianity wrong, is the [b]farthest[/b] from the truth, as it gets. Quite the contrary. The best way to prove that Christianity is false is to find the body of Christ. In Christianity, if the resurrection of Jesus is not true, then Christianity is proven to be false (1 Cor. 15:14, 17). Can science do that? It would be extremely difficult to prove that any particular ancient body, if one were found, was that of the biblical Jesus who died 2000 years ago. Therefore, it would be difficult for science to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt (that is what proof is) that the whole system of the Christian faith is false. So far, science hasn’t done that. It can't disprove that Jesus was God in the flesh and rose from the dead 2000 years ago. So science hasn't disproved anything, as some claim here.

And to say Christians have blind faith, well ... that's beyond laughable. We know [i]whom[/i] we believe in. There's nothing blind about it. The evidence of Christ, is found not only in the [c=#BF0000]experience[/c], but in the [i][c=#BF0000]indwelling of the Holy Spirit[/c].[/i]

[c=#BF0000][b]Acts 2:38 "And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit."[/b][/c]

[b][center]Let's see science disprove that![/center][/b]
Elena05 · F
whats nonsense.. you dont disprove stories...

you dont disprove lord of the rings... you dont disprove 1984... you dont disprove mar and her little lamb...
Speedyman · 70-79, M
And you’re not here to grind a axe I suppose? Amazing how un-selfaware you are! You have a funny idea that robust argument is out. @SW-User
@Speedyman You feel you’re free. That’s a more accurate statement.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Elena05 [quote]dude.. not even the pope treats the bible as a historic book and he knows better then you[/quote]

The pope doesn't know God on a personal basis.
Science begins with theory. God begins with fact!
SW-User
@LadyGrace Thank you, Grace for the clarification. I think almost everyone in this world agree with this point about God , irrespective of their religion.
That's something blissful that whole universe believe that God is Omniscient.
@SW-User Amen to that!
SW-User
@LadyGrace 🤗
God's plan for salvation works one time ... and that one time was enough to cover our sins and get us ready for heaven. We don't want to miss these truths in God's own Word. Salvation is not to be treated by any one of us, as a game of chance, like chess or Russian Roulette. It is much too important for that. Our choices determine our outcome, when it comes to salvation, and gambling with our precious soul, is outright foolish. God said so.
SW-User
@LadyGrace Thank you so much :) I'm sorry to keep you awake so late. I was reluctant to contact you directly because I felt it might be of disturbance to you. I was longing to speak to you for a long time. Today you yourself gave me permission to contact you. I'm not sure what I feel right now. I'm happy. You made me happy. I'm humbled and truly blessed. May be Jesus feels that there is a right time for everything. Have a good nights sleep.
@SW-User I too, believe we are meant to talk and God helped you find me again for that reason. But I must catch up on your other messages, then we will talk.
@SW-User [u]Nowhere[/u] in God's Word does it say Jesus was reborn. He has always been. He is omniscient (knowing everything), omnipresent (a constant presence), and omnipotent (has unlimited power). He was never "born", contrary to belief. He is the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end. We'll understand that when we cross over into the spiritual realm. Our minds are too finite (small) to grasp that now. God made it known in His Word that there is no reincarnation. No being born again in another body or animal. The ONLY "born-again experience we have is when we are "born of (receive), the Holy Spirit of Promise" the moment Jesus saves our soul. No other time. God did not leave us to guess about these things, though others insist it's not that way, and want to twist it to mean something other. God is no liar.

In [c=#BF0000]Hebrew 9:27, the Bible says “It is appointed unto men ONCE to die (not multiple times), but after this the judgment.” [/c]
I just want you to know how much I appreciate your dedication in fulfilling God's calling to spread the good word of salvation, so people wouldn't have to guess how to be saved. You know, we've never once claimed we're the only ones right or that we know everything, though some insist we do, but that Jesus said HE is the way, and we know that to be true, because Jesus was no liar. Being perfect and so much wiser than mankind, He [u]cannot[/u] lie. It is not even in His character, to lie. Those who think they know better than God, or that He can be mocked or ignored, or even His followers can be mocked, are sadly mistaken. God will not be mocked, and He said today is the time to repent and be saved. Not to wait, as we cannot boast that we'll even have tomorrow, so He said it is very foolish indeed, to put such an important decision off, until the next day. They laughed at God back in Noah's day, and even at Noah, but we see that didn't last long. The mockers and naysayers quickly found out that God will not be mocked, and that He is very real!
No, science has not disproven Christianity. Scientists seek to understand how the universe and everything in it works, based on a systematized attempt to learn through observations, hypothesis, testing to validate or invalidate the hypothesis, and developing a theory (a principle generally accepted to be true) that seeks to sufficiently explain something. But, can it prove that Christianity is false? No.
Speedyman · 70-79, M
No it’s just that it’s ironic that so many of your statements are fallacies @SW-User
Speedyman · 70-79, M
Why? You confirm all my suspicions. But I tell you this I will take your advice that I’m spending too much time on the Internet so I’ve got a book I rather want to read. Bye-bye friend@SW-User
SW-User
@Speedyman fuck you
Speedyman · 70-79, M
Thank you friend. Good night@SW-User
JBird · F
Can your religion give me a piece of bread? 😏 If I pray, will bread appear before me? If it doesn't, your post is a waste of time.
wanderingelf · 61-69, M
Science can't disprove that there are phone booths on Mars, either. It's an absurd proposition - - you can't prove a negative, especially one from thousands of years ago. I think where people get into trouble with all belief systems is trying to literalize them, and challenging others over "proof". I consider myself a Christian, and I don't need proof. I don't care. If Jesus never factually walked the Earth at all (which is possible), it doesn't diminish his significance one bit. This is the power and the purpose of myth - - they don't have to be literally true to carry immense universal truth. I believe everything Jesus taught and try to incorporate it into my own behavior every day, but I don't need to believe that it's literally true. It doesn't matter. It's already true in my heart.
wanderingelf · 61-69, M
@GodSpeed63 Probably not as I imagine you'd define it. Many years ago, when I was a devout, practicing Catholic, I might have passed for one. But that's OK...I know what I would do with an injured person or animal who crossed my path, and that would be to be Christ to them as much as possible, for a flawed human. I'm just very agnostic...I see the universe as miraculous, but I don't see a central consciousness that "made" it, or controls what happens in it. And while our western Jesus might have existed historically, or might not have, it is certain that the details of this particular myth are not unique to our culture. Virgin birth, resurrection, three days in the tomb, regicide, all occur in other cultures in other time periods. I think the larger lesson is that we are all connected, and that the very teachings we attribute to Jesus, such as love, compassion, humility, forgiveness and self sacrifice, are indispensable to the attainment of any civilization worth having.
wanderingelf · 61-69, M
@Yulianna Absolutely. You would probably also really enjoy the writings of Confucius (which I consider a precursor to the teachings of Jesus) and Lao-Tsu.
Yulianna · 22-25, F
@wanderingelf yes, no disrespect in omitting them, just a rush to conclude and a preoccupied memory 🙂
yeronlyman · 51-55, M
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RfUj09pWfM]
Sharon · F
@Speedyman Obviously, contrary to what you say, it is christians such as you whose brains have been put to sleep. :)
Speedyman · 70-79, M
You are so boring. Why don’t you try and think of a logical argument?@Sharon
Sharon · F
@Speedyman If you really believed that you wouldn't bother responding to my posts with silly comments. The fact is, your only reasons for being here are to insult others and spread lies and hatred. The evidence is in your posts for everyone to see.
I have never seen a conflict between God and science.
@Mamapolo2016 Stephen Jay Gould proposed "non-overlapping magisteria."
Andy72 · M
That’s because science is based on proving something. Not disproving something
If you ask a religion to prove it they cannot. If you ask science to prove it, they cannot.
What are you left with.

Faith, which does not require proof.

There is nothing wrong with that. But don’t use pseudoscience as an argument.
Andy72 · M
@Speedyman and there in lies the problem.
You put a very reasonable post up explaining why science and religion are compatible. The scientists find it completely reasonable. The religious zealots criticise.
Even Charles Darwin was able to explain evolution as part of gods plan.
Science is just a tool to help us lead better lives. It disproves nothing. Only shows that there is not a good enough test, science evolves.
Faith is usually based on something. Blind faith is one that is still held despite the evidence to the contrary.
As I think most of us have agreed, you cannot disprove something with science, only show there is an explanation, even if that explanation is that there is no evidence with this test.
What we need to do, is stop confusing the two. Most rational people can.
Speedyman · 70-79, M
The only people who are invalid are the religious bigots who decide that science and religion are incompatible. That was what the invalid was there for. For the atheistic fundamentalists @Andy72
Andy72 · M
@Speedyman lol
Now I get it
Entwistle · 56-60, M
Which branch of Christianity?
Entwistle · 56-60, M
@GodSpeed63 I never said that. I wrote "Fairy Nuff" meaning "Fair Enough".
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Entwistle [quote]I never said that. I wrote "Fairy Nuff" meaning "Fair Enough".[/quote]

Forgive me for misunderstanding you.
Entwistle · 56-60, M
@GodSpeed63 No worries.
FreestyleArt · 31-35, M
They can disprove religion since it has nothing to do with God. They just can't disprove God at all. No matter how hard they search and research just to disprove God
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
FreestyleArt · 31-35, M
@Emosaur ah you're bored too? Sorry I'm not gonna play your games
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
redredred · M
Science cant disprove anything since that amounts to proving a negative. You cant prove there are no buffalo in your livingroom.
Speedyman · 70-79, M
Well there is always one! If you’re gullible, it doesn’t mean we all have to be! @redredred
Sharon · F
@Speedyman There's a lot more than one who takes @LeopoldBloom seriously. You, OTOH, are a joke.
Speedyman · 70-79, M
Nomad7 · 22-25, M
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyryP-UpztM]
Speedyman · 70-79, M
Sorry mate but that is just your head. Solid as concrete@Nomad7
Nomad7 · 22-25, M
@Speedyman Ok wasted old man
Speedyman · 70-79, M
Amazing how this comes out when people have got no argument@Nomad7
SubstantialKick · 31-35, M
Holy crap...what a [b]hurricane[/b] of a post!
SW-User
@SubstantialKick It is a long post. It drives people crazy 😂
SubstantialKick · 31-35, M
@SW-User 👀🍿
Christianity certainly exists. Whether Jesus Christ existed as depicted in the Bible is another question entirely. I rather hope so--he seems cool.
@Sharon I'm more concerned about the ones in government.
Sharon · F
@LeopoldBloom Good point. The Head of the Church of England is the absolute Head of State and the church has many of its own, unelected, representatives in Parliament.
@Sharon Although, I've heard England described as "the land of empty churches." That's not the case in the US, which has unusually high religious participation compared to other highly developed countries.

One reason for this could be our separation of church and state, keeping religion in the private sector as much as possible. So it's been allowed to grow much as other businesses have in what amounts to an unregulated market. In the UK and other European countries with official state religions, it's just another boring, stodgy government bureaucracy.

Anyway, just a theory.
SW-User
Christianity is a set of beliefs, not a theory that can be proved or disproved. So arguing whether science can "disprove" it is meaningless. And likewise for any other religion. However certain statements held to be true by Christians at various times can be confirmed or disproved.
Harriet03 · 41-45, F
[image deleted]They got that right!! 🤷‍♀️
Lhayezee · 26-30, F
Science can neither disprove nor prove Christianity (or any other faith). They can happily coexist except in the minds of bigots (and indeed plenty of scientists are deeply religious).
Budwick · 70-79, M
[quote]All we can do at this point is pray for them and not get into foolish arguments with them lest we become fools like they make themselves out to be. I feel sorry for them, I really do.[/quote]

So very true.
Entwistle · 56-60, M
Which branch of Christianity? There have been so many that have died off. Eventually all schools of it will die out.
History can prove a lot of it is baloney.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Speedyman · 70-79, M
Fine. You?@SW-User
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Harriet03 · 41-45, F
Everything science claims to know, it can prove. Religion on the other hand..........
That's the difference!
Next question. 🤷‍♀️
yeronlyman · 51-55, M
Science can’t prove the Easter bunny

But we ain’t going to war over him
Unless you steal my Easter egg cus god told you to!
Speedyman · 70-79, M
Why don’t you try thinking for a change?@yeronlyman
yeronlyman · 51-55, M
@Speedyman

[quote]“You are totally clueless. Why don’t you try and get up to date instead of being mediaeval”[/quote]

As I said perhaps you want to read the most up to date edition of the 2020 bible and then come back to me... 😬
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@Speedyman Atheists can't think. Half of their thinking process is missing in action.

 
Post Comment