Definition of Liberal

Well classic liberals do not favor reform. That is the big difference between them and progressives. What we now call liberals are actually progressives on steroids and progressives are nothing if not control freaks that demand everyone agree with their point of view.

There are very few liberals in the USA today. These people hijacking the name, "liberal" are much closer to fascists than liberals. Ronald Reagan was right.
[quote]‘If Fascism Ever Comes to America, It Will Come in the Name of Liberalism’[/quote]
Ronald was right about a lot of things. Some of his speeches were down right prophetic.

[quote][i]Definition of Liberal
a. Favoring reform, open to new ideas, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; not bound by traditional thinking; broad-minded...[b]So how is it the liberals are constraining free thought?[/b] [/i][/quote]

It's really quite simple. They're conning you:

[b]Definition of a hypocrite[/b]

hyp·o·crite (hĭp′ə-krĭt′) n.

a. A person given to hypocrisy.

b. A person who pretends to be what he is not.

c. A person who practices hypocrisy, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.

Ok, let's call "liberals" what they are-- fascists. They certainly don't fit any of the dictionary definitions.

One of the big differences between a liberal and a progressive is that a liberal does not oppose change. change is good when needed. A progressive believes that all change is good and therefore must bring about change for the sake of change being good. A liberal looks back at a long line of historical events and chooses his way forward carefully. A progressive's history begins when he wakes up each morning. A liberal recognizes that humanity is flawed and must be carefully monitored lest its worst aspects manifest itself. Progressives believe that humanity is what you make it. A liberal knows that humanity is not perfectible. A progressive believes that humans must be perfected. The conundrum the progressives can never address is where did the present failure of mankind come from and how is the deeply flawed going to bring about flawlessness. Two horns of the dilemma that can never be addressed by the progressives in our midst. Thus we see the progressives trying to bring about socialism/communism which they see as the perfection of mankind even though socialism/communism has failed and failed miserably every time it has been tried. The progressive logic is always "it failed because it was not done correctly all those other times." Kind of funny but such a sad condition for humanity to be under the sway of progressives. Those guys will kill you.

The true definition

LOL.

And Obamacare was referred to as "The Affordable Care Act". Yet it's certainly nothing close to affordable.

It’s curious to read the responses to this post. Curious that the open question was downvoted too.

I’d say by European standards I’m Conservative, but in America I’d probably considered a moderate. I lean towards Conservative policies but I don’t vote for the same party every election if I don’t agree they have the best policies or the right people aren’t placed in certain positions. Which is fine - it’s a political party, not a sports team.

I suppose this post is challenging to answer because there’s creative policies but also extremism at both points of the spectrum.

That's why I call these thugs, "pseudo liberals, pseudo progressives, and pseudo democrats. These maggots are more fascist than anything else.

Liberals aren't like that anymore. Now they are the ones limiting Free Speech.

It certainly wasn't me. Perhaps it was the other on that one post yet I wasn't blocked by him.

At these days, liberal word has different meaning depending the narrative.

words mean things.. I know that is not a popular idea

Hey you wanna have lunch at NYU

[quote]Definition of Liberal[/quote]

Conquer and destroy.

You. Will change the world man 😏