Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
Wiiiiiiiiii · 51-55, M
They did want a wall, they just oppose it now because it’s something the President promised and is pushing for.

DunningKruger · 61-69, M
It's a pointless waste of money and time. There are far more effective ways — both in terms of security and cost — to secure the border. Also, this so-called "crisis" is completely overblown. It's nothing but another bid to rile up the right-wing base by stoking their bigotry.

Truth be told, Trump doesn't want a wall, either. What he wants is his opponents to be seen as denying him the wall he promised, which is likewise nothing but a tactic to stoke up his base.
DunningKruger · 61-69, M
Your post alleges that those of the right wing base are bigots. Do you think that there are not those of the left-wing base that are bigots, too? Or are you just an anti Trump person.@DunningKruger
DunningKruger · 61-69, M
@soar2newhighs Of course there are people among the left who are bigots. However, bigotry — against immigrants, against African-Americans, against women and so on — has become cornerstone of contemporary American conservatism. You are attempting to create a false equivalency.

Take this as an example. Jason Smith, a Republican representative from Missouri, yelled at Tony Cárdenas, a Democratic representative from California, "Go back to Puerto Rico!" He did this [i]on the House floor[/i]. Setting aside the fact that Cárdenas's heritage is Mexican, not Puerto Rican, it wasn't all that long ago that someone in that position who behaved in such a risible manner would be expected to resign his position immediately, and if not, he would have been drummed out of Congress. Now? The right doesn't even bat an eye.

Steve King makes openly white supremacist remarks, but he regains his seat in the House anyway. The worst that happens to him? He loses his committee appointments.

Republican congressmen Andy Harris and Phil Roe met with Holocaust denier and white supremacy troll Chuck Johnson on Capitol Hill to discuss “DNA" and "genetics." Johnson is a eugenics proponent.

In 2017, there were 36 right-wing terrorist attacks in the United States. That doesn't include any of the mass shootings that aren't typically classified as terrorism.

At a GM plant in Toledo, white workers regularly put up "whites only" signs above restrooms, called black co-workers "boy," told them to "go back to Africa." They reportedly wore Nazi symbols on their shirts. Eventually, someone hung up a noose.

These stories go on and on and on. There seems to be no end of them.

You want to make the old "there are bad people on the other side, too" argument, bud, knock yourself out. Don't expect for a minute that it bares any resemblance to reality.
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
I'll bite. I'm Canadian like you and not a Democrat, but I agree with them that the wall is stupid.

- Illegal immigrants come to the US because there are people willing to hire them and lax labour law enforcement. There are policy corrections to that.

- Rich Republicans who campaign against illegal immigration still hire them, and this includes Trump. They -want- the cheap labour, but want to punish the people who come for it. I don't see the immigrants as the bad guys in that situation.

- Most illegal immigrants cross legally on a visa (driving or plane or whatever) and just overstay. A wall won't fix that.

- The areas the wall would be built don't have a problem of people flooding across the borders and have a ton of fencing already. The places people cross on foot are the dangerous areas there will be no wall.

- Border agents want more manpower and funding, not a wall.

- Illegal immigrants aren't actually a social problem and I've yet to see a convincing argument that their presence has harmed the US economically. The "the Democrats want illegal immigrants so they get a voting base" is ludicrous and I have yet to see evidence for it. Hell, first generation immigrants tend ot be conservative and would be a voter base for the right if the right wans't so obsessed with persecution. The Ford brothers learned that lesson in Ontario.

- The flood of people from Mexico/Central America is a result of US foreign policy and if they didn't want a refugee crisis the US shouldn't have created one.
revenant · F
@Amyrakunejo a third world war with who ? Mexico ?
CountScrofula · 41-45, M
@revenant

> they are not a problem ?

No.

> they do not demand money ?

Demand money? Could you articulate what you're implying here?

> they do not tax resources ?

There's lots of data showing they're overall tax contributors and use far fewer resources than citizens.

> what exactly do they bring ?

The same thing any immigrants do. They bring labour, knowledge, and population increase. The US and Canada were settled by large waves of immigrants with no education who did not speak English.

More immigrants = richer country. And just like today, all those immigrants were hated by the residents. They even put Ukrainians in internment camps in WW1 in Canada.

But this is a side show. The wall is still a bad idea and won't work, even IF illegal immigrants were bad to the country.

As for persecution I would imagine you'd think this is a good thing? After all you'd want to drive the illegals out.
revenant · F
@CountScrofula Oh you mean hordes of men who do not speak English nor French, have no skills, do not know how to read and write, come from totally different backgrounds, are housed, fed, given more rights than Candadian citizens, have access to healthcare, eye and teeth taken care of for FREE ( hello..Canadian citizens do not even have that right ) are a good thing for Canada ?
I am not blaming them though. Anybody would take for free what is given FREELY, no question asked.
Hospitals are taxed to the limit.
How is the Canadian dollar doing now ?
How is Toronto doing in terms of crime ?

You are conflating settlers and immigrants who built the country. Canada became a rich country. Very rich country.

I am grossly exaggerating on purpose.
AbbySvenz · F
Airplanes, boats, existing crossing points, tunnels....
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
AbbySvenz · F
What’s your source for that? @Razorback
daisymay · 51-55, T
@AbbySvenz Good luck with that. It's not like he's going to pull his own guts out, take a picture of them, and get it posted here before he dies.
Lackwittyname · 51-55, M
Not a Dem, Independent, but why? The cost is outrageous, we are paying for it, tax payers, not Mexico. The majority of illegals are from Visa overstays, the Canadian border is not being addressed so if we are talking borders address both as there is a lot of crap coming from Canada
revenant · F
@Lackwittyname well if you are arguing for the BBC..

page not found on my browser regarding dhs
Lackwittyname · 51-55, M
@revenant Just giving an article that shows different statistics, there is a link in the BBC article that can take you to the DHS one, in point number 6 "more than 700,000 people who entered the US legally overstayed their expected departure date in 2018"
revenant · F
@Lackwittyname OK and ?

I would not give you anything from the CBC (canadian broadcasting corp ) for it is paid for by the liberal party.
PTCdresser57 · 61-69, M
Ok...why are we Americans paying for it? What are the on going costs to maintain the wall? How did the cost start at 5 billion and now 5.7 billion?Trump hasnt done what he promised in his campaign Mexico isnt paying for it and there will be added costs. No wall in the history of the world has stopped anyone...even the great wall of China couldnt stop invasions. Walls and moats around castles stopped no one. Illegal immigrants are at an all time low without a wall and most dont cross the border.
revenant · F
@PTCdresser57 I am not in the US. I am in a country which a pretty good surplus in 2015 but now "the budget will not be balanced till 2041" because of massive spendings in leftist ideals.
PTCdresser57 · 61-69, M
I know you arent in the US. So you understand the spending that goes on in government. In real life I deal with inventory and budgets so I know numbers well. Without proper taxation and spending...governments seem to think money grows on trees...lol
revenant · F
@PTCdresser57 I cannot really talk about those things yes .But I understand that ideologies run the budget though.
SW-User
I'm no dem. But wall is not solution or ever will be built. The whole wall idea is just some trick to use people's racism and hatred against immigrants to win vote. Those illegal immigrants hardly cause any problem to America but they play a role in US economy. They don't come to US and become rich, but they still work hard, and live a difficult life and often get exploited. Not that I support illegal immigrants, but a wall to stop immigrants is ridiculous.
revenant · F
@SW-User in what way are they racist ? what would you offer instead of a wall ?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Sicarium · 46-50, M
Honestly, I've never seen an actual answer to this question. It always comes down to it's ineffective (despite evidence to the contrary) or Trump is just a racist. I see the answers here aren't any different. There's no thought involved, it's just a knee-jerk reaction to Trump.
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@DunningKruger According to the comment time stamps, you spent a maximum of 5 minutes trying to "confirm numbers". I doubt you even Google'd one thing. You can't research anything in 5 minutes. But, in case you are being genuine, here's a start:

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/feb/13/ron-johnson/border-fence-israel-cut-illegal-immigration-99-per/

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/08/22/homeland-security-secretary-border-walls-work-yuma-sector-proves-it-elaine-duke-column/586853001/
DunningKruger · 61-69, M
@Sicarium The Politifact article includes the line, "However, they warn against generalizing that the fence is the sole reason for the drop and raise objections in comparing Israel’s border issues to those in the United States." They also noted that the Israeli wall is 150 miles long, while the US-Mexican border is nearly 2,000 miles long.

Likewise, the Yuma barrier is about 120 miles wide, comparable to the Israeli wall. Yes, apprehensions dropped in the Yuma territory, but a question to ask is did immigrants who would have crossed in Yuma simply decide not to cross the border because of the barrier, or did they simply move their crossing to somewhere where it would be easier? If you drop a big rock in the middle of a river, the river just flows around it.

The USA Today link you provide is not to a factual article but to an opinion piece written by a collaborator in the Trump regime. I do not find Ms. Duke's arguments to be persuasive.

I do not find your arguments to be persuasive, either.
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@DunningKruger That's a misrepresentation, that's the "other side," not the article writer. You are litterally taking an attempt at being unbiased and using it to ignore the rest of the article. That is intellectually dishonest. And the USA article includes links, which you ignored.

[quote]I do not find your arguments to be persuasive, either.[/quote]

I'm not surprised at all, nor am I surprised by your earlier disingenuousness. You want to ignore the data, you didn't research anything, and you'll continue to use false information because it agrees with your world view.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@Razorback Freaking truth.
revenant · F
@Razorback 🤣
Remember Berlin? The wall there? And what did that lead to?

Fuck World War III, thank you.
I of course know that the Berlin Wall was one of many contributing factors, but nonetheless, Mexico has nuclear-capable allies. The wall is going to be one several triggers ready to blow us into the grips of World War III.

If I have to explain any further on how the wall is not and never will be a good idea, then may the Divines be merciful upon you. You're beyond help.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
revenant · F
Seems like a waste of time and money that won't solve anything. But I'm starting to think we should just to show it won't make a difference.
Bobdale · 56-60, M
So out of touch with the real world
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
revenant · F
@Razorback that is a loooot of money spent on illegal immigration
SW-User
Too costly and it would surely be abandoned before it was ever completed or until the next president decides the wall isn’t necessary.
revenant · F
@SW-User a drop in the budget from what I hear. 2020.
rachelsj · 22-25, F
Because it wasn't their idea, they hate trump and still can't get over the fact that he won, and he isn't a part of the political establishment
FreestyleArt · 31-35, M
The Dem's only solution to be in power is to welcome illegal immigrants so they'll vote for them. Without them will be hard for the dems to cheat voters or they can just fuck off.

Plus they don't care if any Rapists, MS13 or any crime pouring through our border and harm anyone.

I could say it's too late for Europe in some parts.
revenant · F
@FreestyleArt ahh voters. yes
lorne13 · 61-69, M
be4cause it would be a massive waste of money and because trump only wants one as a diversion to the many investigations into his criminal activities
revenant · F
@lorne13 where do you get your news from ?
DunningKruger · 61-69, M
@curiosi What?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Bobdale · 56-60, M
To deny anything to do with Trump is there reason.
This message was deleted by its author.
revenant · F
@SW-User am not in the US
This message was deleted by its author.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment