What is white on the top and black on the bottom…..

@meJess But I asked you a couple of questions which you seem to be avoiding. I'm certain you'd agree that if whites in SA were struggling economically, receiving terrible healthcare, sub standard education, that would be an indication that the black government there has placed them at the bottom of society? Then the opposite should be true yeah? Which is the case. The whole point of government representation is for realities on the ground to reflect that reality would you not agree?

@ImNotHungry you seem very concerned to be right, so let’s ignore the whole of Asia, the Middle-East, just forget Africa and say that the problems of your country are a worldwide phenomenon. Even where both black and white persons are a tiny minority it must be as the original post suggests.

You could go to Johannesburg or Harare though.

@meJess
I'm concerned with accurate understanding of matters. Yes.


You appear incapable of following a logical flow of thought. We are not discussing the east or west Asia. We are discussing Africa, or the states in Africa which you mentioned to make your point. Are you able to defend your position on that or not?


Strawman. No one made that claim anywhere.



It seems you may have drawn a conclusion about the original post without fully understanding what it was suggesting. You responded by asserting that political power outweighs economic impact, but let me ask you this:

If the current UK government pursued policies that delivered major economic benefits to migrants while disadvantaging the local population, would the locals still feel like they were in power?

If the majority of them are still represented in Parliament, does that alone make them empowered, even as they bear the economic cost?