Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Skeptics, You Failed To Refute The Last Videos

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4o__yuonzGE]

Here is another video. Let's see if you guys can refute this one.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
Behe claims that irreducible complexity means that evolution is not sufficient to produce all that we see.

For his claim to have any validity whatsoever, he needs to demonstrate a least one examplee of irreducible complexity.

[b]He cannot do that,[/b] and so his claim can simply be dropped into the rubbish bin filled with claims by other such loons
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
What’s with the “brick wall” ?
Carazaa not got your back anymore ? She blocked me months ago, I scared her..
Atheist : 5. Believers : 0
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Sharon @DocSavage [quote]What’s with the “brick wall” ?[/quote]

It means that your so so called 'arguments' run into the brick wall of truth every time.

[quote]Carazaa not got your back anymore ? She blocked me months ago, I scared her.. [/quote]

I seriously doubt that. Carazaa just doesn't like skeptic nonsense is all.

According to you: Believers: 100000000000000000000000000000000, skeptics: 0
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63

You left out the decimal point before your “believers”
What a light year ?
DocSavage · M
We don’t have to. It was debunk in Dover, PA years ago.
You guys lost that one too.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 [b]Give me a single example of irreducible complexity[/b]
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 While we’re at it, let’s include the other recent question that you ran away from for the same reason you’ll run away from this one:

If things weren’t the way they are, then things would be different
[b]Is that correct?[/b]
Simple yes/no
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
You’ll find it with the definition of a light year.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
Oh please! Are you actually trying to flog off this old, old nonsense?

Michael Behe? Seriously?

Irreducible complexity? Please tell me you’re joking.

[b]Give me a single example of irreducible complexity[/b]
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 Perhaps you missed this...

Behe claims that irreducible complexity means that evolution is not sufficient to produce all that we see.

For his claim to have any validity whatsoever, he needs to demonstrate a least one examplee of irreducible complexity.

[b]He cannot do that[/b], and so his claim can simply be dropped into the rubbish bin filled with claims by other such loons


or perhaps you’re desperately trying to ignore it
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 [b]Give me a single example of irreducible complexity[/b]


If things weren’t the way they are, then things would be different
[b]Is that correct?[/b]
Simple yes/no
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 g[quote]oing to argue about it[/quote]

Argue about what? There’s simply no argument.

Behe is lying. He knows what he’s saying in the video is a series of falsehoods, and he knows he cannot produce a single example of irreducible complexity.

There’s nothing to argue about

This is a (very outdated) video of yet another lying creationist making claims he longer stands behind. In fact, creationist websites now recommend that their devotees avoid using these discredited, refuted, claims.

Apparently you didn’t get the memo 😂
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Brilliant! This mousetrap defense has just blown evolution out of the water! Refute? If only Darwin and Wallace looked at their kitchen floors instead of traveling the world observing animals. Time to demand new school textbooks that replace biology with pest control manuals..
Harriet03 · 41-45, F
Religious people think they can see "evidence" of divine design in nature. Yet can't see the evidence of human design in religion.

+ you need to do a lot better than Behe!! 🤦‍♀️
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Harriet03 [quote]Religious people think they can see "evidence" of divine design in nature.[/quote]

I'm not religious, Harriet, but I do see God's grand design in nature and man's dictatorship in religion.
Sharon · F
@GodSpeed63 [quote]I'm not religious,[/quote]
LOL! That is possibly the most ridiculous claim you make. Anyone reading your posts can see immediately that you are religious. Denying it just makes you look even more stupid.
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@Sharon [quote]just makes you look even more stupid.[/quote]

Difficult, but he manages to lower the bar with each post.
laotzu92 · 70-79, M
TFP would be better off sticking to its other issues. This is looney tunes. Are you going to argue next the earth is 6 to 7 thousand years old?
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@laotzu92 Of course he will, lol.
Entwistle · 56-60, M
It's kind of ironic that creationists haven't evolved critical thinking and comprehension skills.
God must have put a stop to that potential when he created them!
DocSavage · M
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FS0hlXxHx78]



Your turn. Let’s see you refute this video.

Atheist : 8. Godspeed63: 0
That’s game , set, and match to Atheist. We win again !
Bushranger · 70-79, M
@DocSavage Bet he doesn't watch it.
DocSavage · M
Why ask skeptics. Why not ask the Atheist to do it. ?
Lynda70 · F
@DocSavage He refuses to admit living Atheists exist. He can't face the fact that some people don't believe his little made up god is real.
DocSavage · M
@Lynda70
He’s going to learn ,
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
How does this man account for people that suffer from anencephaly?
Did the designer just take a day off or something? Or did the biological produce a person that the rest of us would label as handicapped [i](or in a harsh way: flawed considering the expected "design")[/i].
EXTRA TERRESTRIALS PUT US HERE...THEY'LL BE BACK AND I'M GONNA REPORT YOU!!!
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment