Skeptics, You Failed To Refute The Last Videos
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4o__yuonzGE]
Here is another video. Let's see if you guys can refute this one.
Here is another video. Let's see if you guys can refute this one.
61-69, M
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@laotzu92 Well, that would require Godspeed63 to respond in a meaningful and germane manner... and we all know that won’t happen.
All he’ll now do is weave, dodge, ignore, and offer nothing but disingenuous pap.
What he [i]won’t[/i] do is provide even a single example of irreducible complexity
All he’ll now do is weave, dodge, ignore, and offer nothing but disingenuous pap.
What he [i]won’t[/i] do is provide even a single example of irreducible complexity
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 @laotzu92 [quote]Oh please! Are you actually trying to flog off this old, old nonsense?[/quote]
Are you here to refute the video or just stall some more?
Are you here to refute the video or just stall some more?
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 Refute this dated claim that even Behe no longer makes?
Simple... [b]Give me a single example of irreducible complexity[/b]
You cannot, and so the claims in the video stand refuted.
(yawn)
Simple... [b]Give me a single example of irreducible complexity[/b]
You cannot, and so the claims in the video stand refuted.
(yawn)
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 [quote]Refute this dated claim that even Behe no longer makes?[/quote]
If your going to argue about it, the brick wall is around the corner. However, if you want to present your case, well, you're welcome to it.
If your going to argue about it, the brick wall is around the corner. However, if you want to present your case, well, you're welcome to it.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 Perhaps you missed this...
Behe claims that irreducible complexity means that evolution is not sufficient to produce all that we see.
For his claim to have any validity whatsoever, he needs to demonstrate a least one examplee of irreducible complexity.
[b]He cannot do that[/b], and so his claim can simply be dropped into the rubbish bin filled with claims by other such loons
or perhaps you’re desperately trying to ignore it
Behe claims that irreducible complexity means that evolution is not sufficient to produce all that we see.
For his claim to have any validity whatsoever, he needs to demonstrate a least one examplee of irreducible complexity.
[b]He cannot do that[/b], and so his claim can simply be dropped into the rubbish bin filled with claims by other such loons
or perhaps you’re desperately trying to ignore it
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 [b]Give me a single example of irreducible complexity[/b]
If things weren’t the way they are, then things would be different
[b]Is that correct?[/b]
Simple yes/no
If things weren’t the way they are, then things would be different
[b]Is that correct?[/b]
Simple yes/no
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 g[quote]oing to argue about it[/quote]
Argue about what? There’s simply no argument.
Behe is lying. He knows what he’s saying in the video is a series of falsehoods, and he knows he cannot produce a single example of irreducible complexity.
There’s nothing to argue about
This is a (very outdated) video of yet another lying creationist making claims he longer stands behind. In fact, creationist websites now recommend that their devotees avoid using these discredited, refuted, claims.
Apparently you didn’t get the memo 😂
Argue about what? There’s simply no argument.
Behe is lying. He knows what he’s saying in the video is a series of falsehoods, and he knows he cannot produce a single example of irreducible complexity.
There’s nothing to argue about
This is a (very outdated) video of yet another lying creationist making claims he longer stands behind. In fact, creationist websites now recommend that their devotees avoid using these discredited, refuted, claims.
Apparently you didn’t get the memo 😂