Positive
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Skeptics, You Failed To Refute The Last Videos

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4o__yuonzGE]

Here is another video. Let's see if you guys can refute this one.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
Behe claims that irreducible complexity means that evolution is not sufficient to produce all that we see.

For his claim to have any validity whatsoever, he needs to demonstrate a least one examplee of irreducible complexity.

[b]He cannot do that,[/b] and so his claim can simply be dropped into the rubbish bin filled with claims by other such loons
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 [quote]He cannot do that, and so his claim can simply be dropped into the rubbish bin filled with claims by other such loons[/quote]

The only claims I've seen that can be dropped are your claims. I have yet to see you demonstrate one example of what you say is true.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 [quote]demonstrate one example of what you say is true[/quote]

What do you claim I’m saying to be true?

Hint: this is the bit where you run away again
DocSavage · M
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage Tell that to the brick wall, Doc.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
With all the rocks in your head, it’s more or less the same thing.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 Oh, there you are! I thought you were still running away from:

[b]Give me a single example of irreducible complexity[/b]

and

If things weren’t the way they are, then things would be different
[b]Is that correct?[/b]
Simple yes/no

Still, now would be a great time for you to actually answer those two questions

Otherwise, well, both the Anthropic Principle [i]and[/i] Intelligent Design are refuted and dead in the water (in fact they already are, but it’s always nice to have that demonstrated for all to see)
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage @newjaninev2 [quote]With all the rocks in your head,[/quote]

According to your standards, you've lost another one, Doc, I see.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63Oh, there you are! I thought you were still running away from:

[b]Give me a single example of irreducible complexity[/b]

and

[b]If things weren’t the way they are, then things would be different[/b]
Is that correct?
Simple yes/no

Still, now would be a great time for you to actually answer those two questions

Otherwise, well, both the Anthropic Principle and Intelligent Design are refuted and dead in the water (in fact they already are, but it’s always nice to have that demonstrated for all to see)
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 [quote]both the Anthropic Principle and Intelligent Design are refuted and dead in the water[/quote]

They'll never be refuted, Newjaninev, you've shown that they never will be. Please, try again and this time give more of a demonstration.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 [quote]They'll never be refuted[/quote]

You just showed everyone that they [i]are[/i] refuted.

You showed it through your inability and unwillingness to answer two simple questions:

[b]Can you give me a single example of irreducible complexity?[/b]

[i]It seems that you cannot[/i]

and

If things weren’t the way they are, then things would be different
[b]Is that correct?[/b]
Simple yes/no

Now would be a great time for you to actually answer those two questions. As you are unable to do so, both the Anthropic Principle and Intelligent Design are refuted and dead in the water.

Thank you for your help in demonstrating that to everyone
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@newjaninev2 [quote]You just showed everyone that they are refuted.[/quote]

If you're going to argue about it, Newjaninev, there's a brick wall near you. Otherwise, if you want to present your case, you're welcome to it.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
In short Godspeed63 has no idea what you’re talking about
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@DocSavage [quote]In short Godspeed63 [/quote]

In short, Doc, you're just stalling for time.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@GodSpeed63 Arguing? Why are you talking about arguing? I’m not arguing with you about anything

I’m asking you two simple questions.

You seem to be terrified of answering them

[b]Can you give me a single example of irreducible complexity?[/b]

It seems that you cannot

and

If things weren’t the way they are, then things would be different
[b]Is that correct?[/b]
Simple yes/no

Now would be a great time for you to actually answer those two questions. As you are unable to do so, both the Anthropic Principle and Intelligent Design are refuted and dead in the water.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
Stalling for time ? I’m not the one answering questions. Behe was refuted years ago. Why waste time on that idiot ?
Sharon · F
@DocSavage [quote]In short Godspeed63 has no idea what you’re talking about[/quote]
He has no idea what [b]he's[/b] talking about either.
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63
What’s with the “brick wall” ?
Carazaa not got your back anymore ? She blocked me months ago, I scared her..
Atheist : 5. Believers : 0
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@Sharon @DocSavage [quote]What’s with the “brick wall” ?[/quote]

It means that your so so called 'arguments' run into the brick wall of truth every time.

[quote]Carazaa not got your back anymore ? She blocked me months ago, I scared her.. [/quote]

I seriously doubt that. Carazaa just doesn't like skeptic nonsense is all.

According to you: Believers: 100000000000000000000000000000000, skeptics: 0
DocSavage · M
@GodSpeed63

You left out the decimal point before your “believers”
What a light year ?