Should they use ocean water to put out the wild fires?

Poll - Total Votes: 6

Yes use ocean water; what other choice is there?

No let the fires burn out; the ocean is salty!

Show Results

You can only vote on one answer.

Itd slow sea level rise too.
What other option is there.

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

MrBlueGuy Best Comment

I think the salt would damage the environment

exchrist · 31-35

@MrBlueGuy that is the concern; for sure, but freshwater sources are running dry.

Zaphod42 · 51-55, M

The salt would damage the environment, plus you can’t use a plane to scoop it up unless the surface is glassy. I would imagine helicopters aren’t much better equipped for that. On top of which, saltwater corrodes equipment much much faster than freshwater.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

nonsensiclesnail · F

Do you have the device to get the water out of the ocean, right now? And I swear if I find you on the beach sucking on the cut end of the garden hose.... I'll take pictures.

Longpatrol · 31-35, M

It'd put out the fire but the ecosystem will not recover due to the salt content.

exchrist · 31-35

@Longpatrol the environment will recover in time. When we salt the roads to stop ice does it stop all future vegetation?

boklenholley7 · F

I'm not at all qualified or knowledgeable in this area, but yeah! Let's do it!

stound

It's suboptimal because they are salting burned ground, but times is hard

KhairaMaryam89 · 31-35, F

Hm.. is putting fire with salty water a good idea?

ShenaniganFoodie · 36-40, M

In my country we fire bomb, choppers fill via fresh water rivers, dams & swimming pools.

[media=https://youtu.be/l2IJ9iU9VVs]
[media=https://youtu.be/QwbrDZ6-NHM]

Add a comment...