This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
basilfawlty89 · 36-40, M
@Jexie yes indeed, but you use geezer friendly terms lol.
This message was deleted by its author.
Miram · 31-35, F
@ThirstenHowl Fax no printer
Celebrities seem to get away with it a lot of the time. Paul Walker was a case in point. The outpouring over his death seemed to largely ignore the rather distasteful fact that he started dating his girlfriend when she was 16 and he was 33. What's worse, she wasn't even the first 16yr old that he dated!
Mamapolo2016 · F
@FableDNK I agree with that. Extreme caution. But if sexual orientation of any kind is not choice, but biology/psychology - what do we do with this? I am by no means an apologist for pedophiles.
This message was deleted by its author.
Miram · 31-35, F
Fable is correct. It is not a sexual orientation. It is a DISORDER of sexual PREFERENCE
Sexual preference includes three aspects: Sexual orientation (this is about gender preference and ranges from heterosexual to bisexual to homosexual) Sexual Directedness (about age preference) Sexual Inclination (preferences for specific traits or activities.)
So, a person with pedophilic interests might have a heterosexual, bisexual, or homosexual orientation.. (based on the gender of the children), a directedness toward children, and any specific sexual inclinations.
Their sexual directedness is without a doubt harmful and needs be addressed, which is why it is considered a disorder. It is already an established fact in the scientific community that they need to manage it with professional help. It is not comparable to a sexual orientation which isn't harmful. And conflating homosexuality with pedophilia can turn to a discourse of normalization as well as of demonizing a harmless aspect of sexual preference.
We cannot deduce whether or not something is good or bad from whether or not it is biological..even murder is biological. We have their effects to observe and judge with. Their effects are destructive.
We also cannot just lump them up and get rid of them, because like you pointed out, they lack a level of control, and they do not always act on those thoughts, when properly treated. However, actions need be taken to minimize the risks of offending and that's where we all have control.
I would like to wrap this up because I do not want my thread to be a trigger for people who are victims, looking at this and then taking ot as justifications, or those who have the mental disorder looking at it as discouragement from seeking treatement and adding to the stigma.
Statistically most offenders do not have the disorder..and statistically most of them get away with their crimes which means that our energy is better spent on fixing that than arguing about those who haven't offended yet.
Sexual preference includes three aspects: Sexual orientation (this is about gender preference and ranges from heterosexual to bisexual to homosexual) Sexual Directedness (about age preference) Sexual Inclination (preferences for specific traits or activities.)
So, a person with pedophilic interests might have a heterosexual, bisexual, or homosexual orientation.. (based on the gender of the children), a directedness toward children, and any specific sexual inclinations.
Their sexual directedness is without a doubt harmful and needs be addressed, which is why it is considered a disorder. It is already an established fact in the scientific community that they need to manage it with professional help. It is not comparable to a sexual orientation which isn't harmful. And conflating homosexuality with pedophilia can turn to a discourse of normalization as well as of demonizing a harmless aspect of sexual preference.
We cannot deduce whether or not something is good or bad from whether or not it is biological..even murder is biological. We have their effects to observe and judge with. Their effects are destructive.
We also cannot just lump them up and get rid of them, because like you pointed out, they lack a level of control, and they do not always act on those thoughts, when properly treated. However, actions need be taken to minimize the risks of offending and that's where we all have control.
I would like to wrap this up because I do not want my thread to be a trigger for people who are victims, looking at this and then taking ot as justifications, or those who have the mental disorder looking at it as discouragement from seeking treatement and adding to the stigma.
Statistically most offenders do not have the disorder..and statistically most of them get away with their crimes which means that our energy is better spent on fixing that than arguing about those who haven't offended yet.
I think in some cases some people do display more maturity than their peers but ultimately that doesn't change how such relationships will have a negative effect on the individual. Besides ,displays of "maturity" at a young age can be the result of some sort of traumatic experience the child went through growing up,in which case they are really maybe even more vulnerable than other teenagers , who act more as you would expect someone that young to.
Miram · 31-35, F
@PepsiColaP The definition of maturity is tailored to suit the ends of whomever is using it.
Related: have you ever noticed that "girls mature faster than boys" is only ever used to justify dating younger women and never to give them better jobs sooner or trust their judgment at a younger age? 🧐
Miram · 31-35, F
@NerdyPotato Yes, except that scientifically neither genders have optimal frontal cortex development regardless of who is ahead at the game.

SW-User
Yes because "life is an illusion" it is the same category in some sad cases. Where the intellect proceeds to concepts without heart.
Miram · 31-35, F
@SW-User Your way of seeing this is interesting. You project the goodness of your own heart unto these freaks ever having one.

SW-User
@Miram everyone is born with a heart but sometimes things go wrong 😔
The girl who I put more selfless mental energy into any other woman is (kinda) with an older guy. She's 24 and he's 33. He is a DJ an she has virtually no life experience prior to being with him (never been to a bar before meeting him).
I am choosing to move on, unless she changes.
I am choosing to move on, unless she changes.
How do you feel with ppl going in their mid 30s with a girl turning 25 today? Especially when this guy was a DJ and the girl had basically no life experiences andn ever been to a bar before (which cuts a hole into the "she's just really mature" thing)?
Magenta · F
Spot on.
Longpatrol · 31-35, M
What about the word Pedophile? Cuz some of them definitely are
Miram · 31-35, F
@Longpatrol They don't like that word here. Remember I was once threatened with legal action from a popular SWer by his dying dad/alt because he thought I used it to describe him, when all I did was lay down the evidence and the community derived the label 😇
Miram · 31-35, F

Please do out yourselves.
Matt85 · 36-40, M
I don't mind talking to them, the teenagers, but I wouldn't even hug them. There would be no physical interaction. :)
iamonfire696 · 41-45, F
These people are groomers, I was in this situation at that age and didn’t realize what it was. All of it came from trauma from childhood.
If anyone could defend this behaviour then it’s a huge red flag. For the men that wait until she’s 18 are just as bad.
If anyone could defend this behaviour then it’s a huge red flag. For the men that wait until she’s 18 are just as bad.















