This site couldn't possibly be near 50:50. It's not geared for women. Just look at the default options.

You have to set options to limit privacy. Yeah, the options are there. Yet women want the privacy done for them. Automatically.

Women wouldn't have a problem with PMs if it was set to friends only. The default is everyone.

You could go down the whole privacy list. The default is set to yes or everyone, yet most women want it set to no or "people I follow".

The site is geared for men with the current privacy defaults.

Who knows

years ago it was probably more balanced or maybe the bigger userbase made it... better? idk

I'd like to think it's more than 90/10 but idek

What about all those pouty big-chested young ladies who just want to chat with older men? There certainly are a lot of them!

It's about 70/30 and the desperation ratio is off the charts that's why I don't pay it no never mind

A lot to a little

But, if you factor in catfish
It’s 50/50

Probably 25 percent men, 25 percent women and 50 percent men using women's profiles.

It will take 9 men to please me.

It depends on which group you post to or read.

You're leaving out the biggest category. It's ai chatbots to men to women. Best guess, it works out to about 49:42:9.

Doesn't really matter, most don't want to chat to men anyway

Men 2%, boys 90%.

Are we including the men posing as women in this ratio?

Real men to real women…… 🤔 that will forever remain the mystery

Why does it matter, it's not a dating site?

Discounting catfish? 90:10

Automated website padding stats spawning digtal lifeforms that known stating that is necessary that nullifies any claim living support has been given

Whatever the automated site stats decide to fake

93:7