This post may contain Adult content.
AdultSad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

What are your thoughts on transgenderism?

I'm just watching someone say that to validate someone's belief that they are a different gender than what they were born as would be like validating a schizophrenics belief that they can jump off the Empire State Building and fly. Apparently transgenderism is defined as a mental illness and has been for a very long time. Is it a mental illness? I personally think that adults should be allowed to present and live as whatever they want. But when it comes to children I have very strong feelings against allowing them to transition. Kids aren't very good decision makers and I've seen too many stories about children regretting it later, which is so sad. Oh I'll attach the video in case you're curious. I only watched the first minute or two

[media=https://youtu.be/Xm4RaA17E4A]
Top | New | Old
Ducky · 31-35, F
Technically speaking, gender dysphoria is a mental illness. But many conservatives, being the fine and open-minded people they always are, like to dismiss transgenders as mentally ill and go as far as to compare them to schizophrenics. Depression can be a mental illness as well. Does that mean one should just shrug off those who suffer from clinical depression as merely crazy? I don’t think one should go out of their way to walk on eggshells for transgender people to make them happy, but showing a little empathy never hurt anyone and can go a long way. The loaded language some people use when talking about trans people just shows they either have a chip on their shoulder or they’re just plain ignorant.

As for the topic of children who believe they are transgender, that’s something that should never be taken lightly. I have heard stories of trans people who consistently believed they were born the wrong gender ever since childhood, so I do believe that’s a thing that can happen. But I do not support parents allowing their children to transition just because they say they’re trans. I believe that’s something that should be addressed more carefully. Perhaps long-term therapy to be more certain this is truly what the child believes or just a phase they got from things they’ve heard. I don’t know what the right approach to this would be, but again, I don’t support parents letting their so-called “trans kids” to transition. Such parents do seem to take that a lot more lightly than they should.
Notsimilarreally · 31-35, F
@Ducky I agree!
SUPERVlXEN · F
It's an anti-LGBTQ hate term. Let me quote an article from GLAAD on this one:

Online Anti-LGBTQ Hate Terms Defined:
“Transgenderism”


This entry is part of the GLAAD Guide to Anti-LGBTQ Online Hate and Disinformation, an ongoing project to identify some of the most prevalent and egregious terms, tropes, and concepts that are used to harass, attack, and spread malicious misinformation about LGBTQ people on social media.

“Transgenderism”
The current, popularized usage of the term “transgenderism” arises from anti-trans extremists who seek to delegitimize and dehumanize transgender people by falsely implying that being transgender is an ideology rather than an identity.

In her March 2023 essay, “On the Right’s Call to “Eradicate Transgenderism” (It Means Exactly What You Think It Means)” journalist Parker Molloy further explains: “words like ‘transgenderism’ and ‘gender ideology’ are almost exclusively used by anti-trans activists to obscure the fact that trans people are simply people who just happen to be trans. It’s not a belief system.”

For example, the term “transgenderism” was notably weaponized in a speech by far-right commentator Michael Knowles at the 2023 Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), where he pronounced: “For the good of society … transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely.” Knowles posted versions of the speech on YouTube, as well as variations of the same rhetoric on his other social media accounts, while disingenuously asserting that his call for violence was not violent.

On social media, Knowles and other far-right media figures employ the term (along with other variations of the trope such as “gender ideology”) to disingenuously evade platforms’ hate speech and harassment policies — which prohibit speech targeting people with hate on the basis of protected characteristics such as gender identity (while speech targeting ideologies is allowed). Anti-trans figures and groups continue to promote the term online and offline as a dog whistle expressing contempt and hatred of transgender people.

Explore more via GLAAD’s Guide to Anti-LGBTQ Online Hate and Disinformation.

Conclusion
This is just one example of anti-LGBTQ online hate and disinformation. Every term and concept should be evaluated in context. For instance, LGBTQ people and allies may use hashtags with hate terms as counterspeech, or slurs such as “tranny” or “dyke” may be used self-referentially to reclaim them. This guide will be updated on an ongoing basis. Please see the latest GLAAD Social Media Safety Index report for a deeper exploration of the current social media landscape for LGBTQ people, including GLAAD’s recommendations and thought leadership in the field.

How to Report Anti-LGBTQ Online Hate Speech and Harassment
Every major social media platform has policies which prohibit hate and harassment on the basis of protected characteristics, including sexual orientation and gender identity. To learn how to report potentially violative content, check out GLAAD’s LGBTQ Digital Safety Guide, which includes basic tips on helping our community be more safe online.

About the GLAAD Social Media Safety Program
As the leading national LGBTQ media advocacy organization, GLAAD is working every day to hold tech companies and social media platforms accountable and to secure safe online spaces for LGBTQ people. The GLAAD Social Media Safety Program produces the highly-respected annual Social Media Safety Index (SMSI) and researches, monitors, and reports on a variety of issues facing LGBTQ social media users — with a focus on safety, privacy, and expression.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SUPERVlXEN · F
@OogieBoogie
Enough is enough.
They dont get to redefine perfectly good words that IN FACT they made popular in the first place.

I believe they are GLAAD in your mind, or maybe it’s the “pride” movement. They didn’t redefine any word, they provided us with how the word is used [which is where the defining comes into play] in the modern media landscape. Like it or not but words get singled out and used for other purposes than they were defined initially, just like woke got another meaning nowadays. This happens more often than one would suspect, words do get weaponized in speech by far-right wing commentators.

Nowhere does it say you can’t use the word, it does provide you with insight of how the word has been “redefined” [as you call it] in the media landscape by a group of people with malicious intent.

If you don’t like it, it’s on you. GLAAD is in every way in their right to make their observations public to assist those of us that care.

Look how I managed to reply to you without using any profanity or ridiculing of any group of people!

Now go in peace and take care. I’m out of this thread and was in the first place considering not even adding this comment but decided anyway coz the way words change their original meaning more than one would suspect. Bye!
@SUPERVlXEN Oh you didn't use any profanity, that's true, and you know i swear. Its culturally in the lexicon of how i speak about, well, bloody everything😂

Your sarcasm was beautifully pointed and quite personal though.



I have a trans family member.

I spoke to them about this and got their perspective on it.
In fact we all got involved and there was quite a discussion.
Ultimately they reiterated that context is everything, and that just because its used by haters, doesnt make it a hate term.

GLAAD do get to publicise whatever they want. Its a free media.
Just as do you, and i.

The thing is ...its the ethos behind what they publish though.
Choosing to decide particular words are defamatory, only because narrow minded pricks used them that way ....is only giving ugly power to the haters....and the word.
And spreading that opinion - only spreads that hate power further.

Its giving in.
Its giving up a word that they once owned ....with pride.

Why let the haters win ?

People fought hard for the freedoms they have won. I refuse to give up anything all coz a bunch of haters want to control the narrative, and some online site says so.
I struggle with this. I see both sides, though I do acknowledge people's freedom.
FeetAreFantastic · 41-45, M
Calling it a mental illness seems wrong and I don't like calling it an -ism either. People should be what they want to be especially if its not harming anyone else. I agree you should be an adult first before you can make such a decision for yourself. Transitioning IS a big decision after all so that should be taken with due diligence.
WillaKissing · 56-60, M
I agree with you.
GuyWithOpinions · 31-35, M
I think its one thing to be bi or gay. Humans being attracted to other humans is pretty normal.

Wearing the clothes of the opposite gender. Ok, people in a regular societal mindset might think its little strange but whatever.

Getting surgery to change the exterior look of your reproductive organs, destroying your ability to procreate and effectively ending your bloodline, i guess thats up to you but you should really look at what caused you to do that.

Being in full denial that you were born your gender and creating a movment to start propaganda that effects politics and indoctrinates children in to being confused about themselves to force your own ideolgy on others is the product of mental illness. People born into entitlement and a shovenistic ideolgy creates an inflated ego.

I think social media and politics has inflated it into a bigger issue than personal choice.
MethDozer · M
I think its complex. From odd chromosome pairings to gender affirming at birth for intersexed individuals to even brain conditions, to breaking social constructs and subculture. I'm no expert but there seems to be a convergence of things lumped into one umbrella when it more likely seems to be a case by case situation. I have thoughts and questions that would put me on bad terms with each side ofbthe debate.

But at the end of the day I never once thought about chopping my dick off or growing a set of tits. I'n fact the thought of either is horrifying to me to the point of it being in the league of being killed or raped. It's just at that level of horror and "NO". Same that goes for most people I know. So anyone who even entertains that idea at all, let alone to possibly feel more comfortable in their own skin. That person is going through some deep serious shit that I cannot even comprehend. That being the case its up to me as a person to show dignity, respect, and compassion for this fellow human being instead of choosing to add weight to their burden out of what is easier for me to digest.

MostnIve encountered or witnessed one way or the other are jusy avergae acting people doing their thing how they see comofortable. A few are flat out lunatics and an iverboard agenda. That is the case with every demographic of humanity. It just is what it is with that.


One thing that I do have to say and this will put me in hot water qith somenof my peers but oh well. Is that there does seem to be a small contingent of people who have taken the push for recognition and acceptance of the issue as a way to push their weird fetish onto the public and claim transphobia to anyone who questions the motives. It's a small segment but one I think needs to be talked about because in my view they are not only pushing boundries for the sake of kicks they are doing so in a situation that makes it monumentally harder and I'd say dangerous for those who truly have to struggle with this burden and be treated as scapegoats and targets.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Jackaloftheazuresand · 26-30, M
That there are very few actual trans people and most are just using the label because they think the grass is greener
Notsimilarreally · 31-35, F
@Jackaloftheazuresand it became somewhat of a trend, anyone can look at the statistics
Jackaloftheazuresand · 26-30, M
@Notsimilarreally it's mostly victimizing neurodivergent people with identity fog as well
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Notsimilarreally · 31-35, F
@wishforthenight actually I've watched videos of plenty of detransitioners, whom transitioned as children.
@Notsimilarreally It's still nowhere near as prevalent as the right would have you believe.

 
Post Comment