Update
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

President Biden to Introduce Campaign Finance Reform Bill - YES!

https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/biden-to-push-election-dark-money-disclosure-bill-doomed-to-fail-in-congress

At long last a President is attempting meaningful campaign finance reform and expose "Dark money" campaign contributions (i.e. bribery). Thank you President Biden for having the courage to take on this essential battle! It is likely the bill will not pass the senate as it would take 60 votes and Republicans will all vote against it. But this is an opening skirmish in a war to end corporate money corrupting our politics.

"WASHINGTON, Sept 20 (Reuters) - U.S. President Joe Biden will speak on Tuesday about a bill that would require super PACs and certain other groups to disclose donors who contributed $10,000 or more during an election cycle, a measure doomed to fail due to lack of Republican support.

The bill is slated for a Senate vote this week, top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer said on Monday, as Democrats seek to boost election transparency ahead of the November midterms after failing to pass more ambitious voting rights legislation earlier this year.

"Republicans, including Texas senator Ted Cruz, have argued that companies have the right to express themselves through anonymous donations. Democrats say such 'dark money' donations have warped the political system, resulting in laws that do not reflect the majority of Americans' views.

"There is no justification under heaven for keeping such massive contributions hidden from the public," Schumer said.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
We had this until SCOTUS heard Citizens United and corrupted campaign finance.
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@samueltyler2 Right you are.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
LOL, it will never get past upchuck or crazy nancy
Holy crap they’d immediately lose the next election without all of that Chi-nee money backing them and fixing the election machines!@sunsporter1649
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@stratosranger What documented proof do you have that Biden accepted any money from the Chinese? Accusations without evidence are just so much hot air.
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
ron122 · 41-45, M
Most of the democrats money comes from dark money donations.
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@ron122 And the Republicans. Both parties have taken campaign contributions from corporations. President Biden has taken the first steps to breaking the hold of corporate/Wall Street money over our Congress. Thank you President Biden!
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@ron122 where did you find that statement?
dancingtongue · 80-89, M
Continuing to channel Harry Truman: "Give 'em hell, Joe."
Slade · 56-60, M
MarineBob · 56-60, M
How many billions. Has big pharma gave. Biden
@MarineBob You really think that's why?

Lots of bills get passed with agreed-upon pork.

Many bills now are written by lobbyists.

If things (problems, issues, solutions) were simple, the law could be. Three pages can't even handle the definitions for many laws.
OggggO · 36-40, M
@MarineBob
bills should be one item only and limited to 3 pages
That's incredibly stupid.
Slade · 56-60, M
@samueltyler2 Because he knows it'll never pass due mostly to his side. Transparent, cynical shit sandwich that you couldn't have taken a bigger bite
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
As an American I demand that corporations that have no interest in my well-being continue to be allowed to pay for politicians!
RedBaron · M
Unfortunately, it will be a pointless exercise if it doesn’t pass in Congress.
RedBaron · M
@samueltyler2 Nice copy-paste work! 👏
dancingtongue · 80-89, M
@samueltyler2 We agree on the need for campaign financing reform, but not on how SCOTUS works. The "precedent" that they set -- if that means anything anymore -- was that corporations had the same First Amendment rights as individuals and could not be infringed. And that was before SCOTUS was politicized or liberated, depending upon your political perspective. And if you are among those who think it was liberated from politics and the majority have become strict constructionists, wait and see which side begins arguing that it wasn't a "precedent" they set but a strict constructionist reading of the First Amendment. One that would have pleased the Tea Companies at a certain Boston party in the the 1700s.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@dancingtongue Freedom to speak, and even to donate, doesn't give them the right not to disclose the funds they donated, at least that was not part of the decision, as I read it. So the law would have to be specific in the reporting requirements, not the ability to donate, which has probably not been entombed in precedent, not that that meant anything to the current court regarding abortion, for which 3 recent appointees all stated that it was "settled law," only to change their minds.
Slade · 56-60, M
You are such a gullible sap. I'm sure you were screaming this when Ozulu was taking hundreds of millions from every cutthroat anti American dictator

You epitomize what hero Lenin called a "useful idiot"
Slade · 56-60, M
@badminton The huge money overwhelmingly ends up coming from your fellow travelers. You expect us to believe you are upset Zuckerburg gave billions to the anti American left? Or that we believe you don't know your kind will kill it in Congress? Or that you conveniently ignore Trump took no corporate donations in either campaign - only infividuals?
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@Slade 1. Who is the anti-American left? How do you define Anti-American? 2. If Biden had anything to hide why would he introduce a bill that would expose the source of campaign contributions?
Slade · 56-60, M
@badminton Because he knows it'll never pass due mostly to his side. It's a transparent, cynical shit sandwich of which you couldn't have taken a bigger bite
Carla · 61-69, F
Imagine that.
Let's see how they decide to criticize him for this.
Crazywaterspring · 61-69, M
Eff to the yeah!
Knowledge won't stop the spending.
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@Roundandroundwego True, but at least the donors will be exposed to the public, not hidden like now.
Snuffy1957 · 61-69, M
Let's go Brandon !!
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Snuffy1957 I was agreeing with you.
@Snuffy1957 I don't care, it's my instant rejoinder to that phrase.
Snuffy1957 · 61-69, M
@SomeMichGuy
Well good for you.... i just dont care...

 
Post Comment