Has Trump just sank his own presidency ?

@ron122 any other irrelevancies you can come up with?

Your sad, old, king is finished

@newjaninev2

@BizSuitStacy what are you talking about 🙄

@BizSuitStacy

@ididntknow Every American knows exactly what I'm talking about.

@rinkydinkydoink

@carpediem I’m Italian 🇮🇹

@Ximenajacoba I was not referring to you

@TheOneyouwerewarnedabout

@ArishMell The evidence is there in the Epstein Files which he said he would release but now he is hiding them!

@Ximenajacoba Suspecting something incriminating about any individual might exist in unpublished files that might exist, merely on the basis of gossip, is not "evidence" and certainly not proof, of anything.

Also remember that the Epstein scandal involves activities other than sexual offences - principally allegations of financial and political corruption and treachery.

Further, the American legal system - like that of the UK but the reverse of the "Napoleonic Code" used in some Western European nations - uses open jury trials, places the burden of proof on the prosecution not defence; and holds the defendant innocent until proven guilty (or a guilty plea) in a Court of Law.

Also, although under UK Law the prosecution cannot demand any sentence, I don't know if that is also true in the USA.

You might not like someone who happens to run a foreign country, but you still cannot hurl serious accusations around, about anyone, with no genuine evidence. You have no evidence, and neither do I, to support prosecuting anyone for anything.

It is for the American Police, FBI etc to investigate their own politicians, and if they find sufficient, genuine evidence to support it, to lay the relevant charge. For an American Court of Law to determine guilt or innocence, and if guilt is proven, for the Judge to determine the sentence.

Not mere [anti?}social-media gossip. That serves no one, least of all any victims of any crimes.

@Tminus6453