Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
Top | New | Old
$2 a bologna sandwich,you're using deli bologna, not Oscar Mayer.

Carla · 61-69, F
Seems he must need the sign for his own direction.
Seems the need for a paper sign, placed temporarily, where there was never a need for one till now, is evidence of that. I mean...why not wait for an appropriate plaque if the dear leader needs another gold flourish?
Nanoose · 70-79, M
@Carla Trump might need a sign to show him were he works. But I bet he doesn't need a sign to show him were he fills his glut face.
His gut is like a divining rod and it draws him to the dinning room. Cheers!
faery · F
Also need ones for The Rectangle Ballroom and The Concrete Rose Garden
Nanoose · 70-79, M
@faery Yeah and one for the Lincoln bathroom. Trump just renovated it with marble and probably a bit of gold (just kidding it was lots and lots of gold). The things Trump spends tax dollars on while people are going hungry blows my mind. Cheers!
faery · F
@Nanoose I saw the pics; so awfully tacky
Nanoose · 70-79, M
@faery I’m Trailer Trash and I have better taste than Trump. Bet all the marble Trump used is imported from Italy – instead of using a US product.
Cheers!
tobynshorty · 51-55, F
All that gold looks tacky to me.
ron122 · 41-45, M
You made a post to complain about a sign in the White House. Must be an off day for the TDS crowd.
SunshineGirl · 36-40, F
If he really needed a sign, he should have got some local school children to make one.
Nanoose · 70-79, M
@SunshineGirl Yeah but maybe the local school kids would be to weak from hunger to make a sign because Trump took away their school lunch programs. Cheers and happy weekend!
sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M
@Nanoose Imagine that, school children having to rely on their parents for food. The outrage....
ron122 · 41-45, M
@Nanoose Schumer and the rest of the democrats took away their free lunch.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
@sunsporter1649 OK, instead, let's talk about how the tRump admin got HAMMERED by SCOTUS during oral arguments regarding the constitutionality of tRump's tariffs. Every indication is that SCOTUS will agree with lower courts: tariffs are taxes and the power to levy taxes is reserved for Congress only.

And if SCOTUS rules against tRump, it means the federal government has to pay back the over $220 billion in tariffs collected so far.

Tariff: no longer 'the most beautiful word in the dictionary'?
ron122 · 41-45, M
The democrats should stop acting like children and vote to open the Government.

 
Post Comment