3Dogmatic · 46-50, M
Please educate us on how this is Trumps fault? I want facts and not some hate filled rhetoric.
…by the way, they are still finding survivors as of today. Two young girls 27’ up a tree. Chill out with the politics, it’s not time.
…by the way, they are still finding survivors as of today. Two young girls 27’ up a tree. Chill out with the politics, it’s not time.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@3Dogmatic when is the time to review the root causes and look for ways to prevent them?
As far as politics in this case, who threw the proverbial first stone? Who immediately blamed predecessors for lack of better preparation?
As far as politics in this case, who threw the proverbial first stone? Who immediately blamed predecessors for lack of better preparation?
exexec · 70-79, C
As much as I despise Trump and his cabinet of incompetents, I don't believe his actions had anything to do with the impact of the floods. Future disasters? Yes, but not this one.
View 1 more replies »
exexec · 70-79, C
@samueltyler2 Trump's impact on all science is troubling.
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@exexec that is an understatement.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Montanaman · M
Yeah 🙄 it's his fault 🙄
Please.
Please.
kodiac · 22-25, M
Democrats publicly cheering the 90 deaths saying they got what they deserved for voting for Trump .But yeah Trump is the problem .
kodiac · 22-25, M
@samueltyler2https://www.facebook.com/share/p/14F1iZx1DCT/
samueltyler2 · 80-89, M
@kodiac sorry, when i said democrats, I assumed that you woud be smart enough to know i meant meant those whose identities meant something and we could recognize. If this is the best you can do, so be it!
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
@kodiac I remember when Obama cut NOAA funds, because it was right after the big Thailand tsunami. Any third party? Americans get no sympathy, then.
Roundandroundwego · 61-69
The USA has no plans to improve the infrastructure. And no reason to! The population that's not aware of dangers doesn't want to protect itself. So yup,! It's bipartisan decay.
3Dogmatic · 46-50, M
@22Michelle the topography of the Guadalupe river is not conducive to retention ponds or ditches. They had almost a years amount of rain fall in one night. The area is limestone hills and sand. They also had a smaller flood the week prior and the sand was saturated thus reducing the amount of absorption.
To give you a scale of the amount of water, the reservoir down stream (Lake Travis) was in drought status. It is not up over 60 feet from where it was, all from one night of rain.
I am probably more versed in retention/detention ponds and ditches than most here. Being a Houston native and seeing the results of hurricanes and tropical storms, I can say that they work up and to only a certain degree. I stand by my original statement that there is no mitigation for that type of flood.
To give you a scale of the amount of water, the reservoir down stream (Lake Travis) was in drought status. It is not up over 60 feet from where it was, all from one night of rain.
I am probably more versed in retention/detention ponds and ditches than most here. Being a Houston native and seeing the results of hurricanes and tropical storms, I can say that they work up and to only a certain degree. I stand by my original statement that there is no mitigation for that type of flood.
22Michelle · 70-79, T
@3Dogmatic So Lake Travis the reservoir went from drought to 60ft level. In other words it absorbed a great deal of water. aka mitigation, that would have contributed to the flooding. So why aren't there other reservoirs to assist flood prevention?
If you're saying the cost of such mitigation / prevention has been considered and rejected that's a very different thing, but you've given evidence of the potential of flood prevention while also saying such flood prevention is not possible?
If you're saying the cost of such mitigation / prevention has been considered and rejected that's a very different thing, but you've given evidence of the potential of flood prevention while also saying such flood prevention is not possible?
3Dogmatic · 46-50, M
@22Michelle there are four reservoirs along the Guadalupe river. The problem is the area between the lakes. Normal amounts of rain (3-5”) at a time causes minor flash floods but the area handles it well. When it receives 25+ inches in a matter of hours, problems arise that cannot be mitigated. The local authorities bare some blame for not putting flood sirens along the river, but the state is stepping in to remedy that. The other problem that was discovered was that the remote areas lacked cellular signal and the alerts were not received. My oldest daughter was at Lake Buchanan (the Northern most reservoir) during that weekend and said she got the alerts starting around sundown on the 4th. It is just a tragic event.
HobNoblin · 36-40, M
Those floods were caused by rain. Trump is responsible for the other floods, the ones that are made of commie tears.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment